It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by spookfish
reply to post by spikey
The difference here of course would be that the world would be a much much much safer place without a US Government in it.
Why can't NK have nuclear weapons to protect itself against US aggression? The world is at much greater risk of America using nuclear weapons than NK. America is the only nation in history to use such a weapon in anger.
The two faces of Rumsfeld2000: director of a company which wins $200m contract to sell nuclear reactors to North Korea
2002: declares North Korea a terrorist state, part of the axis of evil and a target for regime change