reply to post by zorgon
I don't understand your reasoning. Google it if you don't believe me. Of course, I don't know the motives behind the creation of the sculpture- it was
either made as a deliberate attempt to fool (i.e hoax) or purely as "art", then someone noticed it and 1 of 2 things could have happened:
a) they were aware it was not real, and again, deliberately tried to fool the public
or
b) they were not aware it was not real, and genuinely believed it to be authentic
If B was the case, then technically it was not a hoax, you are right. However, judging by your mediocre grasp of the English language, I hardly think
you are in any place to try and correct me in that instance. At the very least, there was no need to resort to personal insults without any reasonable
explaination given.
edit on 28-11-2010 by ScepticalBeliever because: (no reason given)