It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SarK0Y
reply to post by nenothtu
oh, my friend, i didn't argue landed objects can be protected versus all kinds of radiation (protective earthing, thick walls with radiation shielding ), but that doesn't work so well for missiles and aircrafts
Originally posted by SLAYER69
Now let’s forget the electronic systems/equipment for a moment which would be rendered almost useless with an EMP.
OK let's put this HEMP or EMP crap to bed already. Nobody is buying it not even the Koreans. It seems the US defense industry has been doing a brisk job purchasing hardened electronics for the past 40 or more years. They're in everything. Tanks, Fighter Aircraft, Subs, Aircraft carriers, Missiles and rockets. We designed them that way to fight WW III against the Soviets. Did you think you were the first to think about that possibility?
I never quite understood what the purpose was of having operational electronics, if there was no one alive there to operate them.
The main problem regarding the electronics then was the external antennae, which could have led a killer charge straight in to the electronics, so a lot of vacuum tubes were used there as well. The main problem with the vacuum tubes was that they were bulky, making the equipment less portable.
Originally posted by SarK0Y
as Chernobyl showed, some humans are very stable against strong radiation + aircraft can be lead, after crew's death, by program in offline mode or remote control.
say truly, ground fortification doesn't need to use vacuum valves like aircraft does: wires can be constructed to kill sudden current's spikes
Originally posted by Tyrone
How is the USA military ranked in the top five and not the Afghans or the Vietnamese?
Originally posted by SLAYER69
Originally posted by Tyrone
How is the USA military ranked in the top five and not the Afghans or the Vietnamese?
Both have defended themselves in an invasion against a world power.
The Vietnamese against the US [ With massive assistance from Both China and Soviets] and Afghanistan against the Soviets [ With assistance from the US/West] and US.
And Afghanistan Taliban against the US / ISAF troops [With massive assistance from Pakistan's Army along with its adjunct the notorious ISI WITH THE BILLIONS IN FUNDS DISHED OUT TO THEM BY THE US OF A!!]
THIS BLOODYWELL SUCKS! AND HOW! AMERICAN TAXPAYERS DOLLARS BEING USED TO KILL AMERICAN SOLDIERS!
True enough, but why not START with remote control or pre-programming, rather than risk killing the crew off? Best practice was to just not be close enough for the gamma burst to get the crew. If the plane was that close, the shock wave was likely to knock it out of the sky anyhow.
Yes, but you still had to put the fuse in the final meter of antenna lead,
Stop the flow of food and supplies and you stop there army.
I don't care how well trained they are.
In the first gulf war the US aircraft stopped the resupply of Iraqi troops on the front line.
The iraqi troop did not want to fight they wanted something to eat and there were a lot of white flags flying.
Originally posted by Aim64C
There won't be much waiting for them in North Korea. They'll be given an assault rifle and told: "Your clothing and rations is on the other side of the border. Go get it."
An invasion of the south would be heavily centered around what resources could be seized from the South.
Originally posted by minute2midnight
reply to post by OrionHunterX
Tunnels are nothing more than tombs. You don't need to go into a tunnel to fight the enemy, you just need to keep him from coming out. Eventually, he'll starve to death.