It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
A Minnesota Republican lawmaker who was handcuffed and questioned by police after loitering with a gun near a Planned Parenthood clinic has been stripped of his leadership roles in the Minnesota House.
Security cameras recorded State House Rep. Tom Hackbarth as he was stopped by police last week after a security guard at a Planned Parenthood location in St. Paul called to report a man loitering with a handgun visible at his side.
Hackbarth, who was not arrested and has a concealed-carry permit, says it was all a big misunderstanding. He told police he was looking for a woman he met online.
Originally posted by sara123123
It sounds like the guy did not do anything illegal unless the gun was not registered and he did not have a permit. This is a pre-crime arrest and the action taken in the State's government was purely political. This is probably a modern day witch hunt.
Originally posted by sara123123
It sounds like the guy did not do anything illegal unless the gun was not registered and he did not have a permit. This is a pre-crime arrest and the action taken in the State's government was purely political. This is probably a modern day witch hunt.
Originally posted by mnemeth1
Originally posted by sara123123
It sounds like the guy did not do anything illegal unless the gun was not registered and he did not have a permit. This is a pre-crime arrest and the action taken in the State's government was purely political. This is probably a modern day witch hunt.
I tend to agree.
The guy didn't do anything wrong and didn't hurt anyone. I can also buy his story. He's obviously not a lunatic so unless he actually hurt someone, this seems like pre-crime harassment on the part of the police.
During the 2005 Session, several firearm carry bills were introduced to address the court decisions regarding the 2003 Minnesota Citizens' Personal Protection Act of 2003. In May of 2005, Senate File 2259 was passed by both the Senate and the House of Representatives. Governor Pawlenty signed Senate File 2259 into law (Laws of Minnesota 2005, Chapter 83) on May 24, 2005. This act makes no distinction between "open carry" versus "concealed carry" and persons with a valid permit are allowed to carry using either method.
Originally posted by jibeho
How can the state admonish the man for NOT violating any laws? Anything in his job description that prevents him from carrying legally?
I see people protesting in front of our local planned parenthood every evening and weekend. In my state, CCW and open carry are both legal. No telling what any of these protesters are carrying under their coats at any time. I don't see them being harassed by the police either.
In the Minnesota case, someone caught a glimpse of his weapon and called the police.
Facts, need more facts. Show me the crime please.edit on 27-11-2010 by jibeho because: (no reason given)
Wednesday morning, however, police were contacted by an anonymous tipster who said Hackbarth, a 16-year House veteran, was being untruthful when he provided the name of the woman, police spokesman Andy Skoogman said. The tipster provided a different woman's name.