It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by monkey_descendant
Originally posted by Kombatt98
Originally posted by monkey_descendant
reply to post by Kombatt98
The reviews for seeds of destruction mention Bildebergers, not zionists. So which secret society is it then? And what are the sources of this author like? Does the auther use sources which show actions, cause and effect, then decide to blame it on a secret society rather than companies trying to make money? Or does the author find actual respectable sources about the bildebergers?edit on 25-11-2010 by monkey_descendant because: (no reason given)
Bildeberg is no secret society , but a elite club , secret societies are societies like massoneria and Cosa Nostra , which are heavily internlinked to the committee of 300.
I suggest you start with seeds of destruction ,then move up the ladder ,to other material
I suspect I would greatly dissaprove of the sources the author used, but I'll go into a bookshop and have a look at it if you can open yourself up to what I am saying and try my ideas about looking at cause and events and individuals rather than listening to a conspiracy theorist string events together and claim it's due to some secret society or group!
What I mean is, you thrrew in a counter argument mentioning Ben Gurion's 1962 quote, which I then looked up, and found nothing suspicious in. It's some politican with a theory, some true some not. I didn't see how it could be suspect. This is exactly the sort of thing I'm against.
But I promise to look at that book if you consider what I'm saying and start to try and look at events from that perspective.edit on 25-11-2010 by monkey_descendant because: spelling
Originally posted by Kombatt98
good, look at that you are a worshipper of manifest destiny and zionazis and in the return the zionazi globalists plunder you .It feels good , that those who you worship are plundering you . you deserve it americans
Originally posted by Kombatt98
like Kissinger(zionist) said ,its necessary to cull the population in USA , yes , I support it I hope Kissinger succeeds , because then there will be lesser zio worshippers and fewer zio automatons who mass murder the poor arab peasants .
Originally posted by monkey_descendant
I find the OP refreshing, I really do. It mentions a cause and effect, rather than blaming the upcoming rise on chocolate on _______ (fill in the blank).
Originally posted by Kombatt98
But I am a psychopath , a cold blooded psychopath
Originally posted by monkey_descendant
reply to post by Kombatt98
It doesn't have good accuracy at all, it's timeline is pretty out of date for a start. You do realise that a lot of politicans make predictions, and that academics and economists are paid to make predictions. Some of it comes true, some of it doesn't, some of it is halfway accurate. It's called taking what you already know and trying to estimate some sort of future based off of that. Everyone does that. But because this is Ben Gerion it becomes a "special" prediction.
This is exactly what annoyes me. Half truths, poor unreliable sources (basically hearsay, then quoting some celebrity conspirator, who got it from some other hearsay or blog), events strung together to fit into preconceptions, which again is also done by conspirators.
But lets not argue about this anymore, it's really tiring. Like I said. I promise to go into a book shop and have a look at that book if you could consider what I am saying and apply it to one or two of the theories you look at.
rom the backcover: "Anatoliy Golitsyn's first book, 'New Lies for Old', caused a long running sensation when it was discovered that, unlike most Western analysts, the Author had accurately predicted, some years ahead of the events, the 'Break with the Past' which took place in Eastern Europe and the Soviet Union in 1989-91. In his book 'Wedge: The Secret War between the FBI and CIA' [Alfred A. Knopf, New York, 1994], Mark Riebling, who carried out a methodical analysis of Golitsyn's predictions in 'New Lies for Old', credited the Author with 'an accuracy record of nearly 94%'. This singular achievement puts all other analysts, including some official services, to shame; and it is precisely because of his record of pin-point accuracy that Western Governments, policymakers and even some intelligence services, whose record bears little comparison with Golitysn's, have competed with one another over the years to find reasons why Golitsyn's perceptive explanations of Soviet strategy should be ignored. But events as they unfold are relentlessly proving this remarkable analyst of Soviet strategy to be right. 'The Perestroika Deception' explains the devious secret intent behind the Leninist strategy which the 'former' Communists are pursuing under cover of fake 'reform' and 'progress towards democracy'. The immediate strategic objective is 'convergence' with the West -- on their terms, not ours. The ultimate objective is Lenin's: replacement of nations states with collective regional governments as building blocks of the 'New World Social Order' -- World [Communist] Government."
philologos.org...
I have no idea how you managee to bring in 'zionists' when we are discussing chocolate .. and why you say that I'm worshipping globalists because I am discussing chocolate futures .... buddy ... where'd that come from?
Originally posted by Kombatt98
I have no idea how you managee to bring in 'zionists' when we are discussing chocolate .. and why you say that I'm worshipping globalists because I am discussing chocolate futures .... buddy ... where'd that come from?
your previous statements in previous threads and issues.
Originally posted by Kombatt98
like how your nations attempt to destroy cocoa in south america farmers of cocoa will benefit from higher prices
enables us to convince you with biblical nonsense , so that you can donate to us and send your children to die for us in innocent and stupid islamic nations , while we laugh at you