It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by MavRck
Who are the jews, really? Israel resides in the vicinity of egpyt...syria...jordan...lebanon... none of which contain ethnicities resembling what we know as "jews". Where did they originally come from? They appear caucasion to me... There are supposedly 5 core races of humanity... caucasion, african, asians, african pigmys, australian aboriginees. (I believe all others are mixtures or sects diversified over time) And israel was 'given back' to the jews after WW2... supposedly they lived there during biblical times... it is just strange to me... they are white, living in a (possibly caucasion sect) but quite diverse region... hell, maybe the jews are the first white people ever to arrive on the planet and we spread from there.
Originally posted by jmdewey60
That reinforces my point, which is the claim about a "Jewish" state is just subterfuge and it is really a racist state.
Sorry about that.
Originally posted by Djarums
This is starting to get personal again...
Stop it.
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by sdcigarpig
What I'm talking about is that Israel would not exist without the backing of countries that are nominally Christian.
People like Sarah Palin are militaristic while at the same time claiming to be Christian.
People with that kind of mindset are happy to tolerate atrocities because they think it furthers God's plan or something.
What I am asking for is that Christians return to old style Christianity as it existed before there was such a thing as a modern Israel, and stop handing out blank checks to them without any sort of accountability.
I never implied something such as the Jews and Muslims becoming Christians themselves and I even have a negative view about people who try to convert Jews, especially in Israel itself.edit on 27-11-2010 by jmdewey60 because: (no reason given)
"Islamic" is not ambiguous, it is specific in its meaning and you can't have it mean anything other than what it seems to be saying, which is, it is a religion.
Originally posted by nihilus
Originally posted by jmdewey60
That reinforces my point, which is the claim about a "Jewish" state is just subterfuge and it is really a racist state.
I am curious...
Do you have similar feelings towards:
The Islamic Republic of Iran
The Islamic Republic of Mauritania
The Islamic Republic of Afghanistan
The Islamic Republic of Pakistan
Are those racist? Or is it something specific about the title "Jewish State" that upsets you?
I don't see the difference.
Originally posted by sara123123
reply to post by Yissachar1
There is a big popular myth right now in making Israel the boogey man and the Arab Muslims in the Middle East poor little angry victims of the US and Israel. It's disgustingly ignornant, in my opinion. It reminds me of the day when the communists in the US spun the same exact nonsense making the US into the boogey man and the poor sweet communists (who have murdered hundreds of millions in the name of the Utopian ideology) into victims. The Left never stops in it's thurst for Western blood and destruction.
I don't think this is right, I mean what happened to you. Your words are not falling on deaf ears, in my case, anyway.
We have given up land and properties that had no value until we worked the land..
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by Yissachar1
Thanks, I did, though mine is probably a lot different than yours. I use it to catch up on sleep and stay away from buisness.
I don't think this is right, I mean what happened to you. Your words are not falling on deaf ears, in my case, anyway.
We have given up land and properties that had no value until we worked the land..
Really whatever comments I am making are motivated by my idea of correct Christian theology, and you are kind of in the crossfire. I don't want people like you to feel like you did something wrong, because that's not how I think about it.
You are showing a religious feeling about all this and expressing ideas that I probably don't think about too much. There is historical evidence to support what you mean about salvation. People from all over the known world came to Jerusalem to get close to the temple and the kings of the Earth respected it and considered it a holy place of the greatest importance. It's just a little difficult for non Jewish people to visualise it, being so long past.
An example for me as a Christian, would be when I went to Torino, Italy and was so happy to just stand at the door to the cathedral where the shroud was. (there's pictures at my ATS Media profile page)
That's not the same as meeting Jesus in person, but anything even remotely close to it is exciting to me. So to you, this place is the location for salvation, well I can respect that, and I do think there is something wrong about the current situation. That's great for you, and I suppose that shows a loyalty to your God. All commendable and I don't have a problem with that. On the other hand, Christians need to realize there was a division centuries ago and we have a different God now. If Muslims have another God, well that's fine for them, and they have a place to worship their God, and that is in Saudi Arabia.
edit on 27-11-2010 by jmdewey60 because: (no reason given)
I've been thinking about that quite a bit lately and wonder what it means, like how there is a geographical connection to God. The concept seems counter intuitive, but my little story defies logic, too.
Yeshua (Jesus) is not a christian but a Jew who kept the Law and worshiped at the Temple..