reply to post by SincerelySarcastic
In the future, please paragraph.
Originally posted by SincerelySarcastic
Now we need an Ancient Astronaut thread called The Ignorance of Creationists and Evolutionists the Polarization of Creation and the Ignorance Thereof.
...no, there is no such thing as an 'evolutionist'. It is a scientific theory, not an unscientific worldview.
Ancient astronauts fix this problem quite easily, they're the only thing that does.
No, they don't solve a single problem, they simply beg the questions: "Where did the 'ancient astronauts' come from? How did life on their planet
form and diversify?"
You're just adding a level of regress. Modern cosmology, chemistry, geology, abiogenesis, and evolution all explain things just fine.
The problem with this or that is that it's usually a bit of both.
...no, it really isn't. In science it's usually one theory, not the other. This is a case of science.
If you people would stop trying to figure out what theory is right and which one is wrong and just tried to combine the two, you'd have a much easier
time of it.
No, you really wouldn't. Creationism adds absolutely nothing
to the scientific discourse except a ridiculously random stopping point for all
science that relates to the origin and formation of natural phenomenon.
It's like nature vs nurture, it's obvious that the answer is both, but that's too easy.
No, there is still debate raging in the psychological community over that. Simply saying 'it's obvious' isn't going to settle a debate. You need
hard research and hard data. If "the answer is both" is the conclusion based upon actual data, it gets accepted.
It's like with people being gay, it's a bit of both,
You mean we should hang some of them and let the others live their lives?
No, the solution for that issue is: they are human beings, treat them like any others and let them love who they want to
or with abortion issue, it should be a bit of both (pro-choice fits that description), or any other polarized issue, the answer usually lies between.
Again, you're generalizing over a very broad range of issues.
The Ancient Astronaut Truth,
The Ancient Astronaut Unsubstantiated, Evidenceless, Conjectural Hypothesis
I'm sorry, but I had to fix that for you.
mixed with the fact that the Creator is the Creation,
mixed with the Unsubstantiated, Evidenceless, Conjectural Hypothesis
that the Creator is the Creation
Fixed that for you too.
You don't seem to understand the meaning of 'truth' or 'fact' here.
and the fact that we live in a very conscious universe helped by a myriad of non-physical beings and it's easy to understand how this all works.
There are so many things wrong with this statement I don't know where to start.
...oh wait, yes I do. Again this is all an Unsubstantiated, Evidenceless, Conjectural Hypothesis
There is no evidence that the universe is conscious. There is no evidence of a single non-physical being.
You're arguing with conjecture against stuff that has actual facts to support it. There are mountains of evidence and research into evolution and
other 'origins' related sciences....there's absolutely not science to back up anything
you've said in this thread so far.
Threads like this should get people banned from creating a thread for a month,
No, they really shouldn't. I'm actually trying to highlight the oddity that creationists tend to be misinformed on basic scientific principles, not
just the single topic of evolution. The majority of them have trouble defining evolution
Why should I get banned for highlighting the truth?
it's been done to death and does nothing but cause fighting, nothing good will come from this thread, but the Change we can slowly believe in is
asbolutely hilarious, thanks for that.
No, it's gradual change we can believe in. And it is change we can believe in because there is a mountain of evidence in favor of it.
These sorts of threads are why people don't join ATS and instead just shake their head in disgust on the sidelines.
No, those are the threads that spout of unsubstantiated nonsense. This is a thread highlighting a very real problem.
Hell, you don't seem to understand what 'truth' and 'fact' mean. Those are words that are grounded in reality, not conjecture.
There's nothing worse than a fight between two groups who are both wrong,
Please, go to this thread: Evolution: FALSIFY IT!
and show me that I'm wrong.
I am not wrong. 99.999% of the scientific community isn't wrong. The creationists are wrong.
it's like watching Christians fight Muslims, nothing good comes from it and it hurts to watch.
Yes, because the scientists are really engaging in physical attacks...
Another ignorant post replied to. I should really have gone to sleep after the party.