Okay first off the was no real significant damage done to wtc7.Where's the proof of that?The reason they said building 7 fell was because of fire!Go
to any demolition company and ask them if fire can bring down tall steel and concrete buildings like a controlled demo..and you'll be laughed at.If
fire could bring down tall steel and concrete buildings like a controlled demo then we wouldn't need demolition companies now would we?
Another thing..buildings 3,4,5 AND 6 were right below the towers and were nearly cut in half and guess what?....they still stood,AND had to be pulled
Building 7 was the 3rd tallest and was farther away from the towers and the debris was pebbles compared to what all the other buildings received.
Listen to what Barry Jennings says.!
Barry was stepping over bodies in the lobby of building 7.An explosion knocked him back into the 8th floor.The landing below him blew away.Barry
was trapped for several hours.
"Trapped for hours"?
Barry said all these things but then came out with another video saying that's not what he meant.Perhaps he was threatened to change his story but the
damage was done and Barry would have been the perfect witness for building 7..sadly Barry died mysteriously two days before the release of the NIST
Final Report on the collapse of WTC7. Jennings was Deputy Director of Emergency Services Department for the New York City Housing Authority. On
September 11th, 2001, he saw and heard explosions BEFORE the Twin Towers fell, while attempting to evacuate the WTC 7 Command Center with NYC
Corporation Counsel Michael Hess.
Then you have Nist lying.Saying "nobody said anything about molten steel".
Then you have George Bush lying and said he saw the first plane just before he went in the classroom on 9/11..he even jokes about it.Why does he
joke about it??
Then you have the commission report saying they were set up to fail.
Then you have floors in the towers exploding to dust 3 to 4 floors at a time way below the collapse.
Then you have former FBI coming forward saying it was an inside job.
Then you have firemen coming forward saying it was an inside job.
Then you have people dying in the basement from explosions.
Then you have the pentagon situation where no 757 hit.
What about Lloyd England the cab driver who's cab supposedly got hit by a light pole says it was planned and that he was "in it" and that "we" meaning
him and the planners, "came across the highway together"!
You can't get more blunt than that!
What did Lloyd mean when he said "it was planned".."i'm in it"...WE CAME ACROSS THE HIGHWAY TOGETHER"-Lloyd England "You and their event"?Craig
renke "That's right"-Lloyd England
George Bush's brother AND cousin were security for the WORLD TRADE CENTER!!Out of all the jobs the president's brother chose a mere security job
for the World Trade Center of all places.And was there right up until a couple of months before 9/11..hmm I wonder why he quit just before 9/11?Odd.He
could have hired some of his buddies while he was there huh?I guess it's just another coincidence..just add it to the pile.
According to its present CEO, Barry McDaniel, the company had an ongoing contract to handle security at the World Trade Center "up to the day the
buildings fell down."
The company lists as government clients "the U.S. Army, U.S. Navy, U.S Air force, and the Department of Justice," in projects that "often require
state-of-the-art security solutions for classified or high-risk government sites.".
Securacom (secure-a-con)differs from other security companies which separate the function of consultant from that of service provider. The company
defines itself as a "single-source" provider of "end-to-end" security services, including everything from diagnosis of existing systems to hiring
subcontractors to installing video and electronic equipment. It also provides armored vehicles and security guards.
Larry Silverstien and his 17 million dollar insurance policy he put on the towers that specifically covered terrorism just a couple of months prior to
9/11 would normally be considered suspicious behavior by any investigator!
Larry made 7 billion!3.5 billion each tower, because they were considered 2 separate attacks!
Larry and his Daughter were both absent on 9/11!
Only about 200 pieces of the thousands of steel was handed over to investigators to examine because they did not have the authority to preserve
Accept for the steel that was handpicked for them by the clean up crew!
The rest was sold to China without examining any of it..EVIDENCE FOLKS..sold to recycling companies over seas!
Under Armed guard!!
Why do you suppose they guarded it for??
What was left over after 80 percent of the steel was removed without being examined even though it could have(would have)showed evidence of blasting
from explosiveswas sent to "fresh kills Landfill"..fresh kills landfill?Yeah well people did just die so fresh kills landfill was first
Larry knew, going into the lease purchase that the Towers were asbestos-laden bombs, the first 60 floors sprayed with the building material when
built from 1968 to '72. And they were supposed to be taken down eventually, according to a 1971 New York Council ban on asbestos..Obviously, the
buildings couldn't be legally taken down by explosion or implosion. They would have to be taken down piece by piece. The cost would be in the billions
by today's standards. But there was another way to take them down, wasn't there?
Lucky Larry Silverstein keeps popping up. Hes back and hes bad again. Not content with the nearly $4.6 billion in insurance payments he received to
cover his losses at the World Trade Center, he is now seeking $12.3 billion in damages from the airlines and airport security companies for the 9/11
attack in a suit filed in 2004.
Silversteins laundry list for the $12.3 billion goes like this, $8.4 billion for the replacement of destroyed buildings and $3.9 billion in other
costs, including $100 million a year in rent to the Port authority and $300 million a year in lost rental income, as well as the cost of marketing
and leasing the new buildings..it's not about the money...he swears...hmm good enough for me....not.
Evidence was sold and shipped right from ground zero before and real investigator could investigate.That's illegal.
There's just too many things to list really.I mean when are people going to look and see all the things wrong here?Some don't want to see because
they're scared.They're afraid of change..And you know something?Maybe not knowing is better for certain people.They can live easier without the burden
edit on 25-11-2010 by XxiTzYoMasterxX because: typo