It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Janky Red
People just look at the volume of these threads and the level of anger -
Originally posted by zorgon
Originally posted by Janky Red
People just look at the volume of these threads and the level of anger -
Actually if you really look at the threads ATS was leading the charge long before the Media stepped in..
Originally posted by buddhasystem
So, the panty bomber and the shoe bomber didn't sneak anything????
On December 22, 2001, passengers on Flight 63 complained of a smoke smell in the cabin shortly after a meal service. One flight attendant, Hermis Moutardier, thinking she smelled a burnt match, walked the aisles of the plane, trying to assess the source. A passenger pointed to Reid, who was sitting alone near a window and attempting to light a match. Moutardier warned him that smoking was not allowed on the airplane. Reid then promised to stop. A few minutes later, Moutardier found Reid leaned over in his seat. Her attempts to get his attention failed. After asking "What are you doing?" Reid grabbed at her, revealing one shoe in his lap, a fuse which led into the shoe, and a lit match. She tried grabbing Reid twice, but he pushed her to the floor each time, and she yelled for help, and then ran to get water. When another flight attendant, Cristina Jones, arrived to try to subdue him, he fought her and bit her thumb and Moutardier threw water in his face. The 6 foot 4 inch (193 cm) tall, 200+ pound Reid was next subdued by several passengers on the airliner, and then bound up using plastic handcuffs, seatbelt extensions, and headphone cords
Originally posted by getreadyalready
reply to post by buddhasystem
They weren't the most recent, and they also weren't connected to any terrorist group, despite what the news may have reported.
A video of Abdulmutallab and others training in a desert camp, firing weapons at targets including the Jewish star, the British Union Jack, and the letters "UN", was produced by al-Qaeda in Yemen (whose logo is in a corner of the screen)
Originally posted by zorgon
Originally posted by buddhasystem
So, the panty bomber and the shoe bomber didn't sneak anything????
And how were they 'caught'? Did TSA do a good job?
You can pat yourself on the should all you want. Truth is, you'll probably make a safer flight next time because none of the people on the plane didn't stick anything explosive in their underwear.
Originally posted by buddhasystem
TSA didn't do a good enough job in part because they didn't use X-ray imaging or "enhanced patdowns".
Originally posted by RelentlessLurker
kind of like how the TSA's biggest mouthpiece (janet napolitano) came out and said that the hopkins university claims the machines are safe.
...and for those of you who still cherish honesty:
DHS claim to safety
DHS's own source claiming otherwise
Originally posted by Zanti Misfit
reply to post by buddhasystem
The " Sheeple " have Spoken ! Baaaaaaa
Originally posted by v1rtu0s0
By this logic the more security checkpoints we have anywhere, the safer we will be. So we could have one at the supermarket. One at the kids daycare center.
Originally posted by rogerstigers
Originally posted by gift0fpr0phecy
With security, you loose some liberty.
Without security, prepare to have ALL your liberties taken from you.
Pick one.
Utter hogwash! The TSA has done NOTHING to secure our freedoms! They have caught noone and if they have discouraged anyone from making an attempt, it sure doesn't show up in the statistics. This is just more make believe fear tactics meant to make adult Americans fear the boogy man once again.
This was written by Franklin, with quotation marks but almost certainly his original thought, sometime shortly before February 17, 1775 as part of his notes for a proposition at the Pennsylvania Assembly, as published in Memoirs of the life and writings of Benjamin Franklin Source
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
You would first and foremost be hurting the lower middle class and below in a situation like this, as they are the ones who will lose jobs and income, not the fat cats.
What you are saying does speak of the programing this society provides in this modern world.
But, do you sincerely believe this debate is as it appears, at face value???
The beleaguered head of the Transportation Security Administration said today that at least one airport passenger screening went too far when an officer reached inside a traveler's underwear, and the agency is open to rethinking its current protocols.
An ABC News employee said she was subject to a "demeaning" search at Newark Liberty International Airport Sunday morning.
"The woman who checked me reached her hands inside my underwear and felt her way around," she said. "It was basically worse than going to the gynecologist. It was embarrassing. It was demeaning. It was inappropriate."
Thomas Sawyer, a bladder cancer survivor, said he was humiliated after a pat down broke his urostomy bag, leaving the 61-year-old covered in his own urine. Sawyer said he warned the TSA officials twice the pat down could break the seal.
Originally posted by zorgon
reply to post by Janky Red
It is more likely the fact that the first x-ray scanner went online at Orlando that sparked this
Do you really thing that full body x-rays are safe? Well the TSA themselves say yes... as long as the ANNUAL dosage is below a certain amount... so if your a frequent flyer your TOAST I can see lawsuits in a few years related to Cancer and sterility claims
Originally posted by Janky Red
Just observing from a group dynamic perspective