reply to post by Komodo3
Watch it with the name calling. Because both videos are so easy to debunk it's laughable.
The first, is held up as the "holy grail" of chemtrails". It's wrong. It's easy to see that it is wrong. And I've corresponded with the
reporter, who knows it's wrong. If the reporter knows it's wrong, how can anyone continue to believe it's claims.
It's easy to prove. Look and listen at the same time to the lab results at about the 1:00 mark. He says a different number than is shown. He also
says a different unit
than that shown. The corrected interpretation of the report is the barium had .0668 ppm, or well below the EPA limit.
And I could go on and on about the sampling and contamination by ground level sources. Basically, anyone who continues to use this piece of crap
report is either not able to read a standard chemical test (an ignoramous), or practicing a deception....yep, lying! Or both. I vote for both.
The second video is just proof people do not know or think about perspective. We live on a round earth, with a curved space above us, the atmosphere.
That means that the farther away something is, the lower on the horizon. And the farther away something is, the smaller it appears. The second
plane, which the ignoramous videographer declares is "smaller", is farther away. Because the atmosphere is dynamic and chaotic, no two regions
will have the same conditions. The two planes are flying through pockets of atmosphere with different conditions, miles apart.
One really should try research, looking at details, and critical thinking. I'm just a housewife who has always like clouds, and who noticed the sky
with contrails, my entire life. I saw the obvious error in the lab report, so I researched to make sure I was correct before making any claims.
It's really standard stuff called learning
. You should try it sometime.