posted on Nov, 22 2010 @ 08:49 AM
reply to post by NonKonphormist
You know what I'm getting at... Could be a forgery still.. According to the same logic..
Look, 2000 years have passed since. There isnt much that survived the dark ages for that matter, yet what we can piece together we use as history, no
matter how little info there may be. If you want more proof than we can provide, perhaps you should speak with the vatican. They usually hide away
all the important stuff. Good luck with that btw. Snowballs chance in hell there.
Just because there isnt much in the way of documents OUTSIDE the bible, doesnt mean it didnt happen.
We could go back and forth all day long and it still wouldnt matter. If I present one small bit of evidence, it will be said that it isnt enough.
So... The bible is one.. a really small piece of roman documented info is another, Constantine is another (his mother went to isreal and found
remnants), deciples are another (oh yeah, you dont credit anything other than the smithsonian), some guys eyewitness testimony...
Untill I can present his blood on a slide, you wouldnt believe it anyways.. So again.. whats the point?
Just because we have a birth certificate of a guy who claims to be GW, doesnt mean he was real. Hell, we can even agree that obama was born in
hawaii, yet his BS is there... What if GW was born 2000 years ago but still had a BS? Could we dispute him the same way? What about Julius Ceasar?
Ghengis Khan? You cant tell someone from China that Kunlia or Ghengis didnt exist, yet they're mearly story book hero's, the same way one would
portray Jesus as just another bible story book hero. So we can run around in circles and chase our tails all day.. But for people who dont want to
believe, you're simply not going to find the proof you want, so this really goes no where.