It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

To Bunk Or Debunk...Newbrunswick photo...

page: 1
1

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 22 2010 @ 12:17 AM
link   
Here smething that may have some merit, but should be quickly shot down if i know this panel of skleptics...
here it is, complete with two aliens peekin at ya....
enjoy bunking it anyways....stirling

Yes i ran it through search.....
:lowww.ufo-blogger.com...
edit on 22-11-2010 by stirling because: (no reason given)




posted on Nov, 22 2010 @ 12:28 AM
link   
reply to post by stirling
 


Looks like a painting to me and the enlarged pics are not even pixilated..
Can't see a thing, sorry...



posted on Nov, 22 2010 @ 12:33 AM
link   
hm ..i have to agree..i cant see anything special there...a field with moon...and some pixel ont the others



posted on Nov, 22 2010 @ 12:52 AM
link   
Egad can you not see the figures at the lower right peeking around the trees?
how about the enlargements just below the picture...?noThing there?

How about the glaring bright light at treetop height in the middle of 240 acres of canadian bushland?
Did you read the blurb to know what yer lookin at?
wheres jR when you need him?



posted on Nov, 22 2010 @ 12:58 AM
link   
reply to post by stirling
 


lol, that looks like Homer Simpson to me...
Nah, nothing to see...



posted on Nov, 22 2010 @ 01:02 AM
link   
It could be an alien, it might not... the fact is we can't tell due to the quality of the image.



posted on Nov, 22 2010 @ 01:03 AM
link   
Sheesh, no imagination required here to see the strangeness in the pics...
sheesh!



posted on Nov, 22 2010 @ 01:08 AM
link   

Originally posted by stirling
Egad can you not see the figures at the lower right peeking around the trees?
how about the enlargements just below the picture...?noThing there?


Just a few blurry pixels, to tell you the truth. Of course, I could use my imagination to see all kinds of things, but that's not really the point, is it? The point is to have some evidence that you don't have to use your imagination to decipher, and in fact, prevent you from using your imagination seeing anything but what is actually there.

Sorry. Try again.



posted on Nov, 22 2010 @ 01:24 AM
link   

Originally posted by stirling
Here smething that may have some merit, but should be quickly shot down if i know this panel of skleptics...
here it is, complete with two aliens peekin at ya....
enjoy bunking it anyways....stirling

Yes i ran it through search.....
:lowww.ufo-blogger.com...
edit on 22-11-2010 by stirling because: (no reason given)


You know, not everything can be debunked. To debunk successfully, the debunker would require the original of everything so that it can be put through the necessary procedures. And I don't think that anyone is going to bother to try to debunk or categorize the photo as authentic.

As a debunker/skeptic I'll just say that it is an interesting photo especially with the figures by the tree trunk. I'd like to be able to blow up the photo to see the details for myself but since it's not possible with what's available it just has to be shelved.



posted on Nov, 22 2010 @ 01:28 AM
link   
reply to post by stirling
 


What is there to debunk? Is he claiming the photo actually represents anything extraordinary? I see a rather bad photo. Not much else to say about it.



posted on Nov, 22 2010 @ 01:35 AM
link   
I bow to your superior collective wisdoms....salaaam,
As i have neither photoshop nor the expertise to enlarge this id hoped somebody could do something with it.
It somes from a fairly regular contribtor to UFO digest....Chris holley
edit on 22-11-2010 by stirling because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 22 2010 @ 01:37 AM
link   
There is no point enlarging it. Photoshop will only make it more pixelated.



posted on Nov, 22 2010 @ 01:47 AM
link   
Looks like Michael Jackson to me.

2nd line.



posted on Nov, 22 2010 @ 03:49 AM
link   
whats to study ?

the pictures and story presented are utterly useless

imediate queries that spring to mind :

1 - at what range was pic 1 taken ,

1b - using what camera / lens and cam,era settings [ exif ]

2 are pics 2 / 3 serperate pics or crops / enlarges from pic one

3 can i see the origional , un edited scan of the negative or the native DSC file

all we have so far is a bunch of useless jpegs , and a story long on drama and short on facts

not the recipe for any sort of constructive analysis




top topics



 
1

log in

join