It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Peculiar screenshot of a well-publicized photo of London

page: 1
2
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 21 2010 @ 03:46 PM
link   
I was looking at the 80 Gigapixel photo taken of London and posted online at this URL: www.360cities.net...

After looking around for about 20 minutes I found something really odd.

Seems like the woman on the left in front of the music store is also the same woman on the right walking along with no legs or feet! You will need to scroll to the right to see the entire photo.

Anyone have a logical explanation?



edit on 21-11-2010 by icuiii because:

edit on 21-11-2010 by icuiii because: (no reason given)




posted on Nov, 21 2010 @ 03:50 PM
link   
I don't see the second woman with no legs or feet you are referring to. I only see a woman and a man chatting it up in front of the music store.



posted on Nov, 21 2010 @ 03:51 PM
link   
Oh wait never mind I see it now, yea that is her alright. It is probably because the large image is made up of many other images and that is her before she got to the music store.
edit on 21-11-2010 by SheSellsSeaShells because: mistake



posted on Nov, 21 2010 @ 03:52 PM
link   
reply to post by SheSellsSeaShells
 


Then you need to do as the chap says and scroll to the right...

Anyhoo, as for an explanation, I bet the huge image is actually made up of many images stiched together. Hence, two pictures of the same person. The legs missing might be where the images were stiched together...



posted on Nov, 21 2010 @ 03:53 PM
link   
You do know that a series of pictures have been stitched together to make the entire image, right?!
Look some more you will see more of these anomolies.



posted on Nov, 21 2010 @ 03:53 PM
link   
if i remember correctly, the screenshot is a whole bunch of images put together.
they snapped the one, then the other while she was walking.

wanted o add, i did this once shooting a griz run across a ridge in montana.
ended up that i could line up the pics into a full scenic image, and the bear was in ever once of them.
edit on 21-11-2010 by rubbertramp because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 21 2010 @ 03:54 PM
link   
Yes, the photo was not a single exposure photograph, rather multiple pictures that were "sewn" together to get the final huge image. Simply a time lapse from when the 2 pictures were taken. BTW, first post here, this one was just too easy not to jump on board



posted on Nov, 21 2010 @ 03:57 PM
link   
I believe that's her half sister.



posted on Nov, 21 2010 @ 04:11 PM
link   
Something else thats kinda cool,
It appears that she is looking at herself.
well, halfway anyway.

The BrainGarden.



posted on Nov, 21 2010 @ 04:17 PM
link   
reply to post by icuiii
 


they may have taken multiple pictures then photoshopped them together



posted on Nov, 21 2010 @ 04:38 PM
link   

Originally posted by DisturbedToo
I believe that's her half sister.





posted on Nov, 21 2010 @ 04:42 PM
link   
The woman on the right has just been caught on the middle of putting her invisibility cloak on.

Don't you know that all of us Brits have a free invisibility cloak given to us by the government when we turn 18? I though EVERYONE had one



posted on Nov, 21 2010 @ 04:43 PM
link   
These pictures will have been taken over a few minutes time. In these types of panoramic photo's, as other members have mentioned - they will be somewhat overlapped - hence the 'anomalies' such as phantom or missing limbs and 'twins'.

This is simply a matter of overlapping images over a few moments of time. Capturing the same person a few shots ahead of them selves, due to two or three images are overlayed.



posted on Nov, 21 2010 @ 05:10 PM
link   


Five sets of twins in this shot, can you spot them all?



posted on Nov, 21 2010 @ 05:30 PM
link   
Thats site is pretty cool. aaaargh I cant get this link to work. When I figure it out I edit this again

edit on 21-11-2010 by Cheesefacedogbone because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 21 2010 @ 05:35 PM
link   
It's an awesome panorama.

Doesn't this present some privacy issues?



posted on Nov, 21 2010 @ 08:51 PM
link   
reply to post by mithrawept
 


meh, not really.. they were all publicly visible. Anyone could see what the camera saw..even the naked woman in the window that they photoshopped out.



posted on Nov, 21 2010 @ 11:58 PM
link   
Can anyone tell me how to do some screengrabs???? I found some pretty funny stuff in there



posted on Nov, 22 2010 @ 12:01 AM
link   

Originally posted by SheSellsSeaShells
Oh wait never mind I see it now, yea that is her alright. It is probably because the large image is made up of many other images and that is her before she got to the music store.
edit on 21-11-2010 by SheSellsSeaShells because: mistake


Agree.



posted on Nov, 22 2010 @ 12:02 AM
link   
reply to post by NoArmsJames
 


Yeah i would assume its what the more experianced members have been saying.

Sorry if i'm wrong but isn't that quote and onesecond video reply count as trolling or whatnot?



new topics

top topics



 
2
<<   2 >>

log in

join