It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by phatpackage
reply to post by oozyism
Yep Extremely poor comparison . Even though in your mind they are comparable. They are not. The coalition will outlast Russia. Not even close to compare the Russians to the the coalition - The greatest modern army the world has ever seen!
The greatest modern army the world has ever seen!
Originally posted by backinblack
reply to post by phatpackage
The greatest modern army the world has ever seen!
Now that MUST be sarcasm..
Most expensive, best equiped army in the world can not beat a bunch of goat hearders with AK's and home made bombs...
Thats gotta hurt the ego but I guess the unbeatable US defence force is getting use to the idea of not winning wars...
Originally posted by phatpackage
reply to post by oozyism
have you not worked this out yet. The Co-alition is dragging this out to achieve ALL their objectives. The Taliban is the least of their problems. No Taliban, no war its that simple, gotta keep them alive to achieve objectives. Your country could have been destroyed long ago if that was the only objective. Taliban are some of the most gutless fighters ever to grace the planet. They are only in the game because the co-alition still lets them! When the co-alition is done and hand over to the drug addict the war will be done!
Originally posted by phatpackage
reply to post by sceptical me
Have a look on my post on page 2. Have I missed any?
Sorry Phat, was hyperventilating. Thankfully BIB pulled me up. Peace! oh, and don't forget, most importantly on here, 2nd line!
Originally posted by oozyism
If 700 troops are killed every year, by 2015 that would equate to another 3500 lives gone to waste.
If every year, for one soldier 1 million dollar is spent, and there is 150000 soldiers. That would equal to 150000000000/year just for troop spending.
In five years, that would equate to 750000000000. That number in English means seven hundred fifty billion USD.
What is the point of spending that much money again?
Westerners should be concerned.
Originally posted by oozyism
If 700 troops are killed every year, by 2015 that would equate to another 3500 lives gone to waste.
If every year, for one soldier 1 million dollar is spent, and there is 150000 soldiers. That would equal to 150000000000/year just for troop spending.
In five years, that would equate to 750000000000. That number in English means seven hundred fifty billion USD.
What is the point of spending that much money again?
Westerners should be concerned.
If 700 troops are killed every year, by 2015 that would equate to another 3500 lives gone to waste. If every year, for one soldier 1 million dollar is spent, and there is 150000 soldiers. That would equal to 150000000000/year just for troop spending. In five years, that would equate to 750000000000. That number in English means seven hundred fifty billion USD. What is the point of spending that much money again? Westerners should be concerned.
Originally posted by oozyism
reply to post by phatpackage
Thank you for your service.
Appreciated.
Originally posted by backinblack
Originally posted by oozyism
If 700 troops are killed every year, by 2015 that would equate to another 3500 lives gone to waste.
If every year, for one soldier 1 million dollar is spent, and there is 150000 soldiers. That would equal to 150000000000/year just for troop spending.
In five years, that would equate to 750000000000. That number in English means seven hundred fifty billion USD.
What is the point of spending that much money again?
Westerners should be concerned.
Because all you have just mentioned is payed by the Tax Payer..
The profits from whatever they liberate/steal/grow goes to private individuals and not to mention all the supplies at exhorberant costs on no tender contracts given to their mates such as Haliburton..edit on 21-11-2010 by backinblack because: (no reason given)