posted on Nov, 21 2010 @ 05:19 PM
reply to post by sickofitall2012
I have gone into places that are commonly known as haunted.
I am not denying all these experiences, I just have a different view on them. It can be read from previous post and I think I've even wrote a thread
about it. I've also have had some experiences, one included "ghosts" (damn, I actually forgot about this when typing the thread). But I've paid
attention to my experiences and on myself so I am quite aware of their reasons.
How else can one judge the reality and nature of thing unless not based personal experience and evidence? By trusting stories of others? C'mon, thats
the stuff meant for believers. And within believers, and even in these paranormal experiences, there are too obvious similarities and yet too many
obvious disagreements about the nature of these experiences, that have lead me to my conclusions.
I do not doubt that you haven't seen what you claim you have (unless youre another believer), but have you ever really examined what they really are,
rather than accepted some general theory about them? I do not deny that they may be ghosts, but according to my own experiences and investigation,
they are rather something else.
edit on 21-11-2010 by v01i0 because: 1715