It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Is this a real alien picture? And what about this Roswell EBE footage?

page: 9
33
<< 6  7  8    10  11 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 23 2010 @ 10:22 AM
link   

Originally posted by zorgon

Originally posted by johngrissom
you peeps have some weird thought processes.


The NSA denies UFO's are real yet has UFO files released on the NSA website and you accuse us 'peeps' of weird thought processes?



So funny....

How is this possible? Is the negation of negation.

edit on 23-11-2010 by RUSSO because: (no reason given)




posted on Nov, 23 2010 @ 05:40 PM
link   

Originally posted by RUSSO
The picture i found im my HD. I downloaded this a many years ago and did not save the description.

Does anyone have any information about it?

Is it a real deal?



And about this alleged video of the Roswell crash. This dootage was supposedly taken after the Roswell UFO crash of 1947. One of the aliens can be seen on a stretcher.



And about this one?


And here we have three Alien Videos of researchers looking into a claim that an alien had crash landed back in 1974 and they had got away with an alien before the authorities arrived to cover it up. The Alien skeleton seems to look extreamly real with all of the normal features that have been witnessed countless times around the world. Large dark eyes, a large skull, long appendages. and a small naval cavity. The witnesses that were there at the time of the UFO crash also said that the skin was a white color and the being was having trouble breathing








Any thoughts about this material?

Thanks in advance

edit on 19-11-2010 by RUSSO because: Modify title


This pic seems to be a hoax already debunked in Forgetomori website. I've read the article but I don't have the link.



posted on Nov, 24 2010 @ 12:09 PM
link   
Yes i can agree that those video footage looks VERY authentic. It does make sense that they are that corroded after being hidden for all those years. But that was way back in 1974. Why doesn't the guy just come out to the ufologist now and reveal this information. It has to be proven real carbon dating and like blood testing stuff. One other thing i don't get is, if this guy values this dead alien so much why does he keep it in a wooden box? the box is even unlocked! But to me i think this COULD be the real deal.



posted on Nov, 25 2010 @ 12:01 AM
link   
reply to post by 1AnunnakiBastard
 




This pic seems to be a hoax already debunked in Forgetomori website. I've read the article but I don't have the link.


No, the Forgetomori website tried to debunk this doing other montages, so this proves nothing to me. Just that they want very much that the pic was a hoax, what I think its not.
edit on 25-11-2010 by RUSSO because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 26 2010 @ 08:06 AM
link   
reply to post by kakerot7
 


Good questions.

But will know what is in the minds of those people.

But the story is plausible.



posted on Nov, 26 2010 @ 09:59 PM
link   

Originally posted by RUSSO

...tried to debunk this doing other montages, ...


OTHER montages? So you admit this is / and looks like / a montage. Freudian slip?!
edit on 26-11-2010 by Velocismo because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 27 2010 @ 05:47 AM
link   
2nd video (Rosewell 1947 one) clearly wasn't filmed at the said year, and it is more than obvious due to the FPS rate the camera is filming at.

Whoever made that clip used some effects to make it look like it was recorded by an old camera. Any amateur photographer (not to mention any pro) can easily see this.



posted on Dec, 2 2010 @ 12:39 AM
link   
reply to post by Velocismo
 


No. English is my 3rd lenguage and somethimes iI put wrong words. But if you realy think this is fake, you are free. Enjoy your freedom of speach.



posted on Dec, 2 2010 @ 12:42 AM
link   
reply to post by IsraeliGuy
 


Maybe because the video was remasterized? Do you read all the pages?



posted on Dec, 2 2010 @ 12:45 AM
link   
I will say the EBE in the picture apparently is alive eh?
I mean his head is up


and with the video
Arent the "eye witness" accounts all had the ET as much smaller in size...
this one looks to be more of a grey by legend at least
edit on 2-12-2010 by antibren because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 2 2010 @ 01:09 AM
link   
reply to post by antibren
 


We can't know how many creatures was found in there.

But it is just a theory.
.



posted on Dec, 2 2010 @ 04:07 AM
link   
reply to post by RUSSO
 


I was going through some of my photo's from a while ago, found this one that has been enlarged from the original. I used this with the discussions of Mr. Lear.
He said it was a good find, but the authenticity still eludes me for going one way or the other, thought I would share it here.

On the far right hand side bottom there is some written text to it, I can't get it deciphered, but it is an explanation by Mr. Lears assumption.


i74.photobucket.com..." target='_blank' class='tabOff'/>


edit on 043131p://2874 by Allred5923 because: Added text explanation



posted on Dec, 2 2010 @ 04:27 AM
link   

Originally posted by Allred5923
reply to post by RUSSO
 


I was going through some of my photo's from a while ago, found this one that has been enlarged from the original. I used this with the discussions of Mr. Lear.
He said it was a good find, but the authenticity still eludes me for going one way or the other, thought I would share it here.

On the far right hand side bottom there is some written text to it, I can't get it deciphered, but it is an explanation by Mr. Lears assumption.


i74.photobucket.com..." target='_blank' class='tabOff'/>


edit on 043131p://2874 by Allred5923 because: Added text explanation



WoW... SFY... Thanks so much. Better picture. I can see the face with more sharpness now.

No way this is fake. Too bad i cant read the text, but i will try on photoshop.

Thanks Again....



edit on 2-12-2010 by RUSSO because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 2 2010 @ 04:30 AM
link   
reply to post by Allred5923
 


It is a pitty that many people will not see this...

Im still

edit on 2-12-2010 by RUSSO because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 2 2010 @ 05:00 AM
link   
reply to post by Allred5923
 


I tried to enlarge and sharpen the image...





Still cant read the text... but seems that the year is 1937.
edit on 2-12-2010 by RUSSO because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 2 2010 @ 05:28 AM
link   
reply to post by RUSSO

Best I can do on short notice... need sleep




Date is 1937



posted on Dec, 2 2010 @ 06:44 AM
link   
reply to post by RUSSO
 


Do you know how many times I have tried to decipher this text? LOL
Mr. Lear said it was the original snap shot, the caption was something that referred to the gentlemen and the time,place, etc.etc.
Nice job with the enlargement of it, but it seems as if it get's larger, it get's harder to interpret what it actually says. I knew if Zorgon could get a hold of this, he would be able to either debunk the caption as nothing more than gibberish, or, find out exactly what the big ordeal of that time was. Zorgon is insatiable when it comes to analogies and disclosure of these topics.
Either way, glad you U2U'd me, Don't know what else I can do , I've tried to get the caption clearer, just can't do it with my simple PC apps.
Sorry RUSSO....



posted on Dec, 2 2010 @ 03:37 PM
link   
hahahh the only words I can read is the first four...

This Photo of Alleged ______ then it all gets pretty blurry.... I would love to know how it ends and what word they put in " " as well



posted on Dec, 2 2010 @ 04:19 PM
link   

Originally posted by Allred5923
Do you know how many times I have tried to decipher this text? LOL
....
Don't know what else I can do , I've tried to get the caption clearer, just can't do it with my simple PC apps.


Hi there,

Why are you so interested in the caption on that particular copy of the photo?

If you want, I can look up that copy in the relevant book and post the text.

(Personally, I didn't think that text added anything to the facts that have been presented elsewhere so I didn't bother including it in an online summary I prepared of material relating to the history of this photo. Since I'll be expanding that online summary anyway in the next day or so, I'd be happy to add this caption.)

All the best,

Isaac



posted on Dec, 2 2010 @ 04:30 PM
link   
There you go again beating on the dead horse. The whole 'Photoshop did not exist 50 years ago so photo manipulation couldnt have happened' horse is so dead, please leave it alone.

These photos were manipulated by the Russian government in the 50's






if you like, I can dig some really great work up that was made during the Civil War



new topics

top topics


active topics

 
33
<< 6  7  8    10  11 >>

log in

join