It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Legs missing in picture

page: 6
0
<< 3  4  5    7  8 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 6 2004 @ 11:41 AM
link   
It has 5 pages cuz there are some hot chicks in it...




posted on Jul, 6 2004 @ 11:50 AM
link   
If "hot chicks" (which neither of them are, imho) is the only reason that this is 6 pages now, then this is a sad sad world indeed.


d1k

posted on Jul, 6 2004 @ 01:30 PM
link   

Originally posted by Mynaeris
Can we logic this?

Please note that the person called superhurtin - had these pics on his yahoo photofile.

This person also fits the description given by d1k? and finally has the same homepage ad d1k? home.cogeco.ca...

This really has nothing to do with the current posting, but I must say that d1k has milked one of his photos from LAST (august 2003) summer to the extreme. KNOWING that the pic was a lucky and funny shot he tried to hoax us into believing it was of paranormal value. The fact that he denied he took the pics yet its on his profile makes me positive that he is not bona fide about anything.


Project Pisces that was funny - "Just goes to show you, If your a big fat ugly slob that parties all the time you to can have a hot chic "
However a guy who can get a chick hot or otherwise doesn't need to take pics like these.

[edit on 6-7-2004 by Mynaeris]


Yes thats my web page, yes thats my profile, so what?

As I stated before I did not take the pictures, my friend did, whom didnt have a computer and wanted to save the pictures so he brought the camera to the only guy he knew with a computer, me. My friend who took all the pictures except one IS in a picture, hes in picture 26. Before you say "omg then who took his picture if he was taking the pictures" obviously one of the other guys did. I made the yahoo photo album after I posted the original post just so you guys could see the other photos for what ever reason.


ca.f2.pg.photos.yahoo.com.../d415&.dnm=3121.jpg
ca.f2.pg.photos.yahoo.com.../d415&.dnm=a76e.jpg
hmmmm wonder why he took those?


Duh, why do you think?


Secondly it may interest you to know that d1k recently had a problem with his avatar being considered offensive.
www.abovetopsecret.com...


a) what does that have to do with anything?

b) actually it wasn't my avatar, it was an animated gif on the welcome screen of my home page, one of the mods said that a girl walking into frame, flashing (WITH NO DETAIL) was considered "porn". He said usually thats an instant ban but because it was so minor I just got a warning for it and had to fix it or remove the link from my sig.


[edit on 6-7-2004 by d1k]



posted on Jul, 6 2004 @ 01:52 PM
link   
Come clean , hun, we both know that these are your pics and secondly that you know the original has been doctored. Guess you wanted the pics for the same reason as your "friend".

In the end it doesn't matter you got plenty of points for putting up a pic that you knew there was nothing "paranormal" about.

Best of luck - I have no interest in cute chicks, so won't be back.



posted on Jul, 6 2004 @ 02:26 PM
link   
well....I'm gonna stick my head up some other hole...this one's no fun

I mght check back in here or there to see if there's any progress

d1k - I've asked you the same question in two posts without any answer, so I'm assuming you just want to continue this rubish of defending yourself against people who don't want to take this anywhere...who cares tho really...I think I said it first on like page 2 or 3...there's no educational value in analyzing this anyways - once we get away from the issue of it not being faked the answer is one in a million

I love being ignored


d1k

posted on Jul, 6 2004 @ 02:52 PM
link   

Come clean , hun, we both know that these are your pics and secondly that you know the original has been doctored. Guess you wanted the pics for the same reason as your "friend".

In the end it doesn't matter you got plenty of points for putting up a pic that you knew there was nothing "paranormal" about.

Best of luck - I have no interest in cute chicks, so won't be back.


Theres nothing to come clean about, you basiclly said theres some conspiracy saying I stole these pics of someones yahoo album. Saying my yahoo account is not mine, that I got a warning here on ats before so I must be hoaxing and other nonsense. If you are going to try to claim its a hoax you could at least do better with a little more intelligence.

The original files have the date, time and camera name of when they were taken, I'm pretty sure if you alter them it would say, then again I dont know, thats why I sent the originals to Muppet and offered to send them to anyone else who wants them.


d1k - I've asked you the same question in two posts without any answer, so I'm assuming you just want to continue this rubish of defending yourself against people who don't want to take this anywhere


What questions? I've been trying to reply to every point brought up and thought I did.

[edit on 6-7-2004 by d1k]



posted on Jul, 6 2004 @ 02:56 PM
link   

Originally posted by EnronOutrunHomerunI think we've tried to get this thread going in the right direction multiple times, but either no one is looking over the past few pages or some people are just too stubborn for their own good.

As I asked a few posts back - maybe you can tell us a location of where these photos were taken...or explain a little more about why you edited your original post to tell us that the man in the picture is not that great of a person...any other details you can lend will lead way to a more fruitful conversation...I think muppet did an excellent job of analyzing the pictures for editing, and came up with minimal proof...Let's get beyond this

Here's a portion of one of my previous posts - maybe any insight you have on the details can actually spur a little more of a debate...despite some new person walking in on the conversation without reading previous posts, why not just consider the whole "it's faked" idea to be dead...I think it would be interesting to actually talk about what happened here apart from a hoax.


d1k

posted on Jul, 6 2004 @ 03:00 PM
link   
I'm pretty sure the pictures were taken at Emerald Lake, its the beach my friends and I always go to every summer. This is not 100% certain but I will ask the owner of the pics as soon as he gets here (hes expected any minute to go get some lunch with me) but Emerald Lake is pretty much the only beach like that we go to. My friends and I live in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada and Emerald Lake is not far from here, and it's always packed with good looking ladies


As far as why I said that about the guy in the picture, it's true. He is not someone you would like to know. Hes a friend of a friend, and is not my friend. I don't really want to go into that because I do not want to publicy assassinate his character (even though he does not have much of one) so i'll leave it at that.



posted on Jul, 6 2004 @ 03:02 PM
link   

Originally posted by d1k
I don't really want to go into that because I do not want to publicy assassinate his character (even though he does not have much of one) so i'll leave it at that.


He'll never sue.. he doesn't have a leg to stand on!



sorry



posted on Jul, 6 2004 @ 03:11 PM
link   
D1k: I think you are being totally disingenious here - trying to drag out this longer than it needs to be. Firstly , you are obviously the ONLY one on ATS that didn't understand what I said? Or trying to confuse people about what I said. I will repeat I am saying that (a) that you are the guy on yahoo - that the pics are in YOUR file, including bikini panty shots , (2) that you took the pics and (3) that you know how the pic was made to look like he had no legs.

Secondly, regarding your avatar/website I posted the ATS link concerning the issue. How you resolved it is your problem. At that stage you also tried to weasel out of taking responsiblility.

If you are going to be "fighting back" at least do so with honesty. Don't pretend that I said things that I never did. The pic is a boring one of a fat drunken dude behind two chicks. You took it , its in your briefcase at yahoo, its a year old and now suddenly you want to find paranormal meaning to it.

What I like about ATS is the fact that people don't eat everything up for truth.


d1k

posted on Jul, 6 2004 @ 03:20 PM
link   

Originally posted by Mynaeris
D1k: I think you are being totally disingenious here - trying to drag out this longer than it needs to be.


Needs to be for whom? Seems you are just reaching for anything, mostly non relevant to say it's a fake. It also seems you have a real problem that there are girls in the pictures. Anyway, last reply you get from me.

[edit on 6-7-2004 by d1k]



posted on Jul, 6 2004 @ 03:22 PM
link   

Originally posted by muppet He'll never sue.. he doesn't have a leg to stand on!

lol - okay...so now that a little more of the story has been filled in, maybe someone has a clue...maybe someone can say, "Oh, I've heard of that place...this this and this happened there once" - Or maybe some comment on the guy...he's plastered with two girls over-indulging himself in "sin"...maybe the great and mighty smiter hath smited him....lol - I dunno....The whole possibility where somone is supporting his weight from behind and positioning the photographer is one option, but after a few beers, anything is possible - lol - is the guy or some of his friends in these photos aware of how they turned out? How drunk were they? Like to the point of not being able to remember taking that picture? Been there - done that - case closed


[edit on 7/6/2004 by EnronOutrunHomerun]



posted on Jul, 7 2004 @ 03:40 AM
link   

(a) that you are the guy on yahoo - that the pics are in YOUR file, including bikini panty shots


Wow. I can't beleive how dense people can be at times. Mynaeris, d1k has said at least fives times now that he created that yahoo photo album so the fine folks here at ATS could view the complete set. So yes, he is the owner of the album - thanks for pointing out obvious.


d1k. I have no idea what to make of that photo. Fake or not it's still and interesting picture.

*goes back to lurking*

[edit on 7-7-2004 by Djien]



posted on Jul, 7 2004 @ 09:52 AM
link   
It's just one more clear example of someone jumping on page 6, or whatever page this is, and not reading previous posts - gets annoying but it happens all the time....



posted on Jul, 7 2004 @ 10:48 PM
link   
girl on the right is a godess..

either its been altered....
its an illusion....
...or hes a ghost



posted on Jul, 8 2004 @ 12:09 AM
link   

Originally posted by Relentless
Don't suppose it has occurred to anyone here that this thread has become more than a mystery picture at this point. You guys are funny BUT!

These pictures were reportedly taken privately, and not by the person posting them. The people in the pictures are a bunch of friends horsing around and having a good time.

Wonder how any of them would feel if they knew these pictures were now posted on one of the most heavily viewed boards on the web? How would you feel?

I am stunned with so many people on this site concerned about their rights and their privacy that people are having such a great time over this obvious invasion of privacy and a exhibiting such a total lack of respect for the people in the pictures.

The original picture, though a valid discussion is crossing a line on privacy if the subjects are not aware this is on the net, and have not agreed to it. As for the link to the rest of them - TOTALLY INAPPROPRIATE!

Hello???



Get a life!!!

If they did not want their pics talked about then they should not have posted them on the internet where EVERYONE on the internet has access to them.
The fact of the matter is that the author of this thread put the link to all of the pics out here.
So your beef is not with anyone who makes comments on the hot babes, but with the author of the thread who made the link available. ERRRR!!

If you are a chick, put your pic out here and if you are good looking I will say SCHWING for you as well!
If you are fugly, then you will also reap some rewards as well.

Regardless, your choice, we all are exercising our right to free speech and if you do not want to hear/read it then go to another thread!!

So 'Are u for real???'



posted on Jul, 8 2004 @ 12:26 AM
link   

Originally posted by Mynaeris
Can we logic this?

Please note that the person called superhurtin - had these pics on his yahoo photofile.

This person also fits the description given by d1k? and finally has the same homepage ad d1k? home.cogeco.ca...

Ergo d1k and superhurtin are the same person. Secondly it may interest you to know that d1k recently had a problem with his avatar being considered offensive.
www.abovetopsecret.com...

This really has nothing to do with the current posting, but I must say that d1k has milked one of his photos from LAST (august 2003) summer to the extreme. KNOWING that the pic was a lucky and funny shot he tried to hoax us into believing it was of paranormal value. The fact that he denied he took the pics yet its on his profile makes me positive that he is not bona fide about anything.


Project Pisces that was funny - "Just goes to show you, If your a big fat ugly slob that parties all the time you to can have a hot chic "
However a guy who can get a chick hot or otherwise doesn't need to take pics like these.
ca.f2.pg.photos.yahoo.com.../d415&.dnm=3121.jpg
ca.f2.pg.photos.yahoo.com.../d415&.dnm=a76e.jpg
hmmmm wonder why he took those?




[edit on 6-7-2004 by Mynaeris]



Mynaeris
Please post your pic. The people demand to know if you are hotter than the chick in orange or is Bandit's dog better looking than you? Woof!!!!



posted on Jul, 8 2004 @ 12:42 AM
link   
D1K

Rock on dude!!!

Don't let these non-believers bother you.
You have something interesting, so follow it. Thats what this whole site is about.

Also nice pics of pretty ladies!
I hope you got some of that action, Pimp daddy!!!!


d1k

posted on Jul, 15 2004 @ 05:10 AM
link   

Originally posted by Are u for real???
D1K
Don't let these non-believers bother you.
You have something interesting, so follow it. Thats what this whole site is about.


Thanks man, still waiting on Muppet to post what he has to say about the meta data he was talking about. If he can see original info that can confirm the pics were not faked I would really like him to post it.



posted on Jul, 15 2004 @ 05:19 AM
link   
obviously he is using the orange girls breats as a beer bottle holder any wayz

this is nteresting kind of looks like photoshop or a upload glitch other wise its some wierd jugabo ritual thing he might disappear into thin air

get those girls phone numba tell them to (call me :roll




top topics



 
0
<< 3  4  5    7  8 >>

log in

join