OK, After TOO MUCH reading, I have found the following:
First, read my initial thoughts at:
And then read:
The following is an analysis of the second thread listed above with special extracts and my comments in square brackets:
4/29/2004 @ 1.12am = REAL AB
5/09/2004 @ 1.12am = REAL AB
5/09/2004 @ 4.22am = REAL AB
"I will not give a date because it is variable so that would be pointless"
"The object coming at us...or OBJECTS as such...are in fact similar (but not the same)..." [lots os objects being described as ONE object]
"It IS a comet...of sorts..." [good hint here from him]
"we will NOT be destroyed by a "Big One" as such" [so you can all he happy]
"Mankind will survive" [ditto]
"it MAY...and I mean MAY miss us"
"WITHIN SIX TO EIGHT WEEKS" [ie, max date of 6th July 2004]
"the fragments wont miss" [I believe this is what we are beginning to see with the incomings hitting houses etc]
...the moon turning to blood (by the way. this is EXACTLY what will happen while passing through the debris cloud)" [an incoming dust cloud with Fe
"we were discussing the possible effects of the debris cloud of the crab nebula passing through our solar system in 2000 to 2005" [this was a "half
truth" to see who knew their stuff and to observe the debunkers]
"we wondered what to tell people about the approaching debris cloud" [another hint that it IS a dust cloud]
5/09/2004 @ 8.59pm = REAL AB
"I thought that bit about the crab nebula would get the debunkers to identify themselves" [he makes a dismissal re the "crab nebula" ONLY - NOT
the dust cloud]
"Serious astronomers know which debris cloud I am talking about" [OK, we now know it´s a debris cloud of sorts]
"there IS a debris cloud passing through our solar system" [ditto]
"P.S. About the debris cloud....can you think of a better explanation as to why the sun is almost a white star..." [the other day I actually had a
friend of mine comment about how bright the sun is - more on this later]
5/10/2004 @ 6.15pm = REAL AB
"Look up "SUPER NOVA" AND 2-0 bc" [good hint - replace the - with a zero and use a boolean search when doing your research]
"We are all in very VERY close range of our doom" [take this with a pinch of salt - I think AB was a bit emotional here. Sure many will prob. die
from incomings, tsunami´s etc but not all]
"death will rain down in the form of nickel-iron chunks of doom moving VERY VERY FAST" [OK, we have the reason for the red dust cloud now]
[don´t get all depressed with the doom and gloom with the above most recent post - AB was very emotional]
5/10/2004 @ 7.10pm = REAL AB
[AB not emotional anymore and is now calm]
5/11/2004 @ 2.42am = REAL AB
"I will NOT give anyone the satisfaction of KNOWING FOR SURE"
"Try old libraries and archives" [he is right - after my research on the Internet, there are CERTAIN articles that cannot be found...and I know how
to research the Internet as I have been involved with it DEEPLY for the last 10 years. I will give physical article examples that people can find
5/11/2004 @ 7.27pm = REAL AB
"The approaching comet...well...THAT will either HIT or MISS...as I said...it is variable so don´t expect a date because even WE couldn´t figure it
"It is MORE than just the Meteors" [ie gamma/x rays, electrons, protons etc - this is from my research]
"PROVE ME WRONG...I DARE YOU" [typical aussie statement - LOL]
5/12/2004 @ 1.43am = REAL AB
"WE WERE THE FIRST ONES TO DISCOVER THE DAMN THING"
5/12/2004 @ 2.03am = PTB
5/12/2004 @ 2.29am = PTB
5/12/2004 @ 9.29am = PTB
[the above three posts are a "chain" and form the basis fo the hoax claims; a)provide some info from third party to "summarize" (this is the main
data to start the hoax), b) have supposed original poster "confirm" "hoax data", c) have supposed original party "analyse data" and throw in a
bit of the "orignal theme" to "make people believe this is the original poster (OP)"]
5/12/2004 @ 11.05pm = AB
"THIS forum is tagged now" [AB telling us the PTB have "infiltrated"]
"False dates are common" [a hint that the posted dates are wrong]
"The PTB has done rather well. I cant blame them" [hinting about "hoax chain"]
"the friction is due to the dust" [light at this stage]
"THE FORUM SCREWS UP WITH HACKS AND TRIPS. TAGGED...like so many others I have visited" [confirming "hoax chain" again]
5/12/2004 @ 11.49pm = PTB
5/13/2004 @ 12.20am = PTB
"perhaps it will be you that tells ME what is coming" [yeah right - wrong data PTB as AB KNOWS what´s coming]
5/13/2004 @ 12.29am = PTB
"radio waves was one of the ways we detected the cloud to begin with" [the PTB know who AB is and is posting some "real data" for a change]
"debunk me all you want" [PTB calling people to expose the "hoax chain"]
5/13/2004 @ 2.42am = AB
5/13/2004 @ 3.20am = AB
"The sun is already turning almost white because of the massive influx of particles" [another clue]
5/13/2004 @ 3.33am = AB
"I will NEVER give my identity away" [proves previous "hoax chain" where the PTB gave an identity]
5/13/2004 @ 3.50am = AB
"IP wont work either...I use many here and there" [AB telling the PTB´s they may know who is is but they don´t know WHERE he is]
5/14/2004 @ 1.27am = AB
5/14/2004 @ 2.29am = PTB
5/14/2004 @ 6.49pm = PTB
5/14/2004 @ 9.14pm = AB
"It is NOT the end of the world"
The stuff from "Revelation 6:" is all third party and NOT posted by AB.
OK, from what I gather, we have a dust cloud coming in (or earth sweeping into) from a super-nova.
What this brings I really do NOT KNOW...apart from dust, meteorites (how big I don´t know) and burts of gamma/x rays etc. The # may hit the fan, it
may not...I´m not an expert...
A good indicator of "burts" etc can be found at:
Look at the 7 day plots.
For those of you who are going to post rubbish - don´t bother as you WILL NOT receive a response (well maybe if they´re really stupid responses
Good luck and I hope "the truth" finally comes out.
Hopefully AB is still out there...somewhere...and still alive.
BTW, thanks AB for the heads-up :headbang:
I have provided the following articles if anyone is interested in researching this further. I have given up on my research and hope maybe that someone
else will take the batton.
A good article I would like to find is:
"Can Supernovas Scar Earth?" By Mark Sincell" but I have search high and low and cannot find it on the Internet. It is probably in hard
copy...beware someone posting a link from a "credible source" as this may be the PTB posting a "modified" version of the article.
Another good article:
To quote the above article:
"A nearby supernova would bathe our planet in high-energy particles -- cosmic rays -- with potentially disastrous effects," and "... increasing the
global cloud cover, leading to a ´cosmic-ray winter´ and a mini-extinction." and "Those effects include a huge increase in global cloud cover and a
dramatic decrease in the protective ozone layer." and "The enhanced cosmic-ray bombardment from a nearby supernova could create a large increase in
global cloud cover" and ""There is fossil evidence for a couple of mini-extinctions during the Cenozoic Era," [we now have GLOBAL cloud cover (in
general). Look at: www.eumetsat.de...
*A official NASA document about "The End of Days":
*NASA´s awakening that they need to get the data out:
*The people who would probably know:
*Super Nova Info:
From the above article - "...space, packing together a new gas clot. And as each cools, some of the gas will condense into dust"
*Good read from NASA article:
In the above article, look at page 15.
*Gamma Ray Observations:
[edit on 30-6-2004 by John bull 1]