It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Quote the post immediately before yours: This makes no sense, and quoting the entire previous post above yours will result in a slight warning.
Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by Cassius666
That was no "laser". This has already been mentioned in quite a large number of other threads, if you take some time to search and read, you will see. Also, might want to research the realities of laser targeting systems....whoever made that YouTube video is just making it up, without understanding the details and technology.
(For instance...the lasers used in REAL targeting situations? Infra-red. Invisible to the naked Human eye).
That video? Debris, in the air. Not even near the building, most likely..but just in the camera frame, coincidentally superimposed on the building, in the far background.
United 175 was flown by the suicide hijackers. Period.
Originally posted by weedwhacker
Keep in mind, when just Googling online: MOST of those types of "9/11 conspiracy" websites never, ever, ever. ever change what they've put up (their "info" that is mostly innuendo, speculation, and overall general crap).
They NEVER change it, even when it is proven beyond doubt to be false. They are running a huge con, and that is their game.
Originally posted by PersonalChoiceEVERYONE who believes the video in question shows a laser being painted on the south face of the tower, please read carefully the following:
I urge you to go view the video of the supposed "laser painting of the south tower" again, except this time, you must view it in high definition.
What you believe, and most others who undoubtedly view the video on the lowest quality of playback, on a low quality screen(not capable of 1080p res), is a laser beam. Is in reality, a piece of paper.
The paper is creating a optical illusion, as it appears it is moving across the south face moments before f175 appears to impact at that very same point. Then it appears to move across the next basically southern facing building, which is several blocks away.It's very important to understand that the second building, that the so called laser(really a piece of paper) goes across, is several blocks away from the towers.
what we see is a piece of paper that falls from the smoke column, as it falls it appears to first be in front of the towers but then move across the face of the second much closer building. Really though, it was only falling in front of the second much closer to, the person filming and building. Which as was noted is several blocks to the east. This is plain to see in high definition playback and with a hd monitor.
Originally posted by PersonalChoice
The person who made this YT vid did us a giant favor, because he conveniently adds a video that completely debunks his first theory and name of his YT video(Laser Targeting UAV Drone Attack on WTC 9/11 SloMo Closeup). At approximately 1.09 into the video, he plays a very tight shot of the same exact view as the person that filmed the "laser/paper", of f175 slamming into the tower. Watch it carefully, notice anything? Notice anything missing from that tight shot? You should, its the laser, the fact is you only see it in the one that filmed it. Because it was a piece of paper falling out of the smoke column very close to them.
Originally posted by PersonalChoice
Of course this is all IMHO, but rest assured that is no laser.
Originally posted by pryingopen3rdeye
reply to post by Cassius666
imo....
whats in the video does appear to be either a laser dot, or a reflection of the sun off a moving object, perhaps the planes windows,
the dot of light does appear to jerk around just before impact which indicates it is not a reflection off the plane.
and the dot appears to be steady enough that whoever is in control of it could not be more then a few blocks away, so i think that rules out new jersey,
also, military laser painting tech uses lasers which are not visible to the naked eye, you need a infrared device to be able to see them. this camera phootage could not be displaying the same tech.
.MARIA: She was sitting when she heard a noise, at the same time she felt like it--it shook--like the building shook, she said. She called me immediately. She said, 'You know, there's--there's something wrong, look at your window by the twin towers.' So I grab my binoculars and I could see the towers from my window.
And this is where I, you know, I'm looking. I saw the smoke from the top, just from the top of the towers.
MILLER: (VO) After watching for a little while, something caught Maria's at-tention in the parking lot below her window.
MARIA: Like a few minutes must have gone on, and all of a sudden down there I see this van park. And I see three guys on top of the van, and I'm trying, you know, to look at the building but what caught my attention, they seemed to be taking a movie.
MILLER: (VO) Maria says the three young men were kneeling on the roof of a white van. It was parked right here. They were taking pictures of each other with the World Trade Center burning in the background.