It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

NASA maps features hidden under Antarctica ice - Live Chat Nov 18 2010.

page: 2
29
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 17 2010 @ 08:55 AM
link   
OH Boy OH Boy a whole new area for conspiracies to germinate and flourish. Goodie Goodie I can't wait.




posted on Nov, 17 2010 @ 09:04 AM
link   
Here are some footage about Operation High Jump.

70 minutes color documentarie: Operation High Jum "secret land"

Some others:






posted on Nov, 17 2010 @ 09:23 AM
link   

Originally posted by estebadia
maybe they used the submarine to break some ice


more seriously, think about cold war, spies, international waters, and the necessity of having a submarine capable of an underwater surveillance in case of the russian send a sub too .

my idea, worth a penny ?
Sounds good to me, worth 2 cents maybe.


They did have icebreakers with them though, so I'll go with the Russian sub theory.



posted on Nov, 17 2010 @ 10:28 AM
link   
no atlantis tv in beverly hills listed on IMDb



posted on Nov, 17 2010 @ 11:05 AM
link   
reply to post by keyseeker
 


I'm a firm believer in centripetal force and that the planets are hollow and inside our planet there is many different civilization and life. There is a ton of evidence supporting this, artic flights, satillite paths, Byrd, Verne, Polo, doctored photos from NASA. I've been to Mt. Shasta where there is a believed underground domed city called Telos, I have never been to Telos but as child camping up at Shasta I've seen many of weird things ufos, lights...
Very cool find!



posted on Nov, 17 2010 @ 12:33 PM
link   
i remember seeing a thread regarding ancient maps that detailed what was under the ice up there,

Its one of the plaes on my to go list .

keep us posted



posted on Nov, 17 2010 @ 02:14 PM
link   
Seems like the only way of entrance to the holes in Antartica is by means of flying.



posted on Nov, 17 2010 @ 04:23 PM
link   
i totally agree



posted on Nov, 17 2010 @ 04:52 PM
link   
reply to post by EarthOccupant


Thanks for that link
Been looking for a copy of the whole film for some time. I have seen the clip of the warm area before. What amazes me is that no one has done a follow up on that . It is certainly not on any maps or google Earth. Yet the NAVY film clearly shows a large expanse that is ice free



posted on Nov, 17 2010 @ 04:59 PM
link   

Originally posted by MystiqueAgent
Hmm I'm starting to see a lot of correlation with Antarctica and everything that lies south of the equator. It seems we need some investigators of our own to go down and see what's going on there.


Everything south of the equator covers a LOT of territory... can we be more specific on where those investigators should start



posted on Nov, 17 2010 @ 05:06 PM
link   

Originally posted by marriah3330
Ditto, youd think that if there was a whole TV crew missing, we would be able to find SOMETHING such as news reports, newspaper reports, hell even the enquier magazine, but all i found was this same exact article over and over again,


What part of "it was a story for a book" did you misunderstand?




posted on Nov, 18 2010 @ 02:11 AM
link   
reply to post by zorgon
 


I guess the part I missed was where they didnt mention it was in a book, that was the part I missed I guess, a big part.



posted on Nov, 18 2010 @ 02:33 AM
link   

Originally posted by marriah3330
I guess the part I missed was where they didnt mention it was in a book, that was the part I missed I guess, a big part.


Yeah but don't worry about it... It was released as a news story originally. It had me chasing it down too when I saw it originally
It was just that I posted the book stuff the post before yours



posted on Nov, 18 2010 @ 02:48 AM
link   

Originally posted by Lil Drummerboy
After NASA's letdown of the Space object that was just a Black hole.
I am completely deflated..
no energy for excitement.


That comment and this thread as a whole really sums up the mindset of ATSers.

The NASA survey is to study the ice cover and surface features below the ice in order to better ascertain the effects of future ice melt in the region. They are not looking for Hogwarts Castle or Atantis so the likelihood of them announcing they've found something which doesn't exist there is somewhat lower than the likelihood that John Wayne was actually an 19ft tall black martian.

You guys really do set yourselves up for disappointment every time


On the other hand, looking forward from a scientific aspect to seeing the results of this scientific survey.



posted on Nov, 18 2010 @ 03:00 AM
link   

Originally posted by Essan
You guys really do set yourselves up for disappointment every time


No you are wrong. NASA sets us up every time.. making a big fuss about an upcoming press release then disappointing us every time.

If it's just about ice... been there done that, the Vostok studies are more reliable than good ole NASA

edit on 18-11-2010 by zorgon because: ArMaP did it!!




posted on Nov, 18 2010 @ 06:02 AM
link   

Originally posted by zorgon
reply to post by EarthOccupant


Thanks for that link
Been looking for a copy of the whole film for some time. I have seen the clip of the warm area before. What amazes me is that no one has done a follow up on that . It is certainly not on any maps or google Earth. Yet the NAVY film clearly shows a large expanse that is ice free

I have read somewhere that the ice-free area is explained by the fact that Antarctica is basically a desert and the area with no ice receives almost zero precipitation.



posted on Nov, 18 2010 @ 12:17 PM
link   

Originally posted by butcherguyI have read somewhere that the ice-free area is explained by the fact that Antarctica is basically a desert and the area with no ice receives almost zero precipitation.


That would not account for the lakes that are not frozen over when the rest of the continent is under a sheet of ice. I guess I have to do some more digging.

And I have another problem... I just took for granted that the NASA image of Lake Vostok was the real deal



yet how do we see its shore line when it is buried 3700 meters beneath the ice?



As to that warm area with several lakes not frozen... NOWHERE on any images can I find it



The red oval is lake Vostok



Seems I have some work to do. One would thing that open water lakes in Antarctica would command more attention and investigation. Very odd that it is so hard to find any info on this



posted on Nov, 18 2010 @ 01:08 PM
link   
Does anyone know whats at 70° 9'1.00"S, 87°46'22.64"E and why it looks like that on google earth? It's approximately 14 1/2 miles long, and 4 1/2 miles wide. It looks to be partially green underneath but it has a white fog type of covering above it, maybe its nothing, I'm not very familiar with google earth, but I did find it intriguing none-the-less for the fact of it looking like a piece of land, whether it is or not. But, I just thought I would add it in anyways.






posted on Nov, 18 2010 @ 01:08 PM
link   
reply to post by zorgon
 

Geothermal heat source?
Must be a wicked one though.



posted on Nov, 18 2010 @ 02:19 PM
link   
How and when do you join the chat?



new topics

top topics



 
29
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join