Originally posted by getreadyalready
reply to post by seagull
It is reckless to "dare" another country to "bring it on." Nobody wants to see a nuclear war, or even another conventional war.
Indeed, most do not. I do, sometimes, have to wonder though... Reckless rhetoric is, in its own way, is a dangerous as a war.
BUT, I contend that it is equally reckless to apologize and give the impression that we do not support our government, or that we are not
united as a country. Nothing invites aggression like pathetic whining!
Agreed!!! I believe a Roman senator said it best (paraphrasing here!!): If you want peace, prepare for war. Peace is achieved by having the
strength and the willingness to use it to protect yourself. But only as a last resort... The trick, I suppose, is knowing when that time has
come...
Which do you think is more likely to lead to war, whimpering, whining, apologizing, and asking to please not attack us, or daring anyone to
bring it on? I don't like either approach, but "Fortune favors the Bold!" Take Iran, and N. Korea as cases in point. They are weak, but they
feign strength to keep their populace united and their enemies at bay.
I suppose, if those are my only choices, "fortune favors the bold" is the way to go. Doesn't mean I have to like it, or condone it. Rhetorical
sabre flourishing has it's drawbacks, 'cause eventually, someones going to make you put up, or shut up. It's best, as Theodore Roosevelt said
(paraphrasing, again...): "Speak softly, but carry a big stick..."
One needn't practise blustering rhetoric to get the message across.
That's the point I should have made originally...