LA Plane Theory is blown out of the sky - US missed Chinese Missile, page 6


Pages: <<  3    4    5    6    7    8    9  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 151 times


reply posted on 15-11-2010 @ 07:40 AM by jexmo
Originally posted by backinblack
Originally posted by AllIsOne
Originally posted by Phage
reply to
post by NuclearPaul


Not if you look at the unaltered image. It's a highlighted portion of the contrail. The "second contrail" is a cloud.



Could you please state the altitude of that cloud? The "plane" was at 37'000 feet?


And do you know what else?? If you believe the plane theory then that thing is over 160 miles away!!
How big is that thing??


How big is that missile?!!



reply posted on 15-11-2010 @ 07:41 AM by T3hEn1337ened
This is why I didn't actually sign up for an account on ATS until recently; because I know there are a plethora of stubborn people on this site who, regardless of whether their claims are valid or not, will defend them to the death. Not trying to be too critical, Boondock Saint. Your theory is plausible, and once married to an idea, it's hard to see the other side, but I feel it is necessary to present another possible scenario, the JET CONTRAIL SCENARIO:



(not sure about embedding images...)

YES I took a look at some very similar looking contrails of patriot missile intercepts, but it doesn't rule out the fact that this could still be a jet contrail. In my scenario, the "second contrail" and "missile debris" are just part of the first contrail. Note that there is a dark band of that runs through the center of the contrail, with highlighted edges on either side.

I'm not saying you're wrong, Boondock Saint, just that you're a little ways away from definitively proving anything. Finally, before flaming me, consider that agreeing with the opposition ("You're right, it might be a jet contrail, but I wanted to bring this to people's attention because it doesn't look like one to me.") is much more productive than "Ha ha, wow, you're such a disinfo agent omg!" There's a difference between denying ignorance and denying everyone who doesn't take your word as gospel.


reply posted on 15-11-2010 @ 07:47 AM by PayMeh
reply to post by boondock-saint



Oh, I know mate. Just kinda throwing out all the things that went through my head the past few days contemplating this thing.


reply posted on 15-11-2010 @ 07:55 AM by Human_Alien
reply to post by boondock-saint





A person of normal sensibilities would have to be intellectually numb, overly medicated or otherwise too preoccupied with their gadgets to realize there is something very, very wrong.

These explanations range from the “embarrassing if true” to the “downright insulting,” with a few variations in between.

If you're like me and believe there is a lot more taking place behind the curtain of power (run by International bankers and the power elite) then you too will likely have trouble sleeping tonight!



reply posted on 15-11-2010 @ 07:58 AM by Imightknow
Even if it was a Chinese missile(which I'm not saying it wasn't), I'm not worried about our missile defense shield. Using missiles to shoot down incoming missiles in technology from the 80's and 90's. We can take down missiles and planes now with this www.militaryaerospace.com... t/the-airborne-laser-its-huge-it-flies-and-it-blows-up-missles.html and it's much more accurate and faster.


Only reason I think that this wasn't Chinese is because I think their would have been a response of some sort from the US and our military. You can't just shoot a missile into our airspace and expect a "ooooh, aahhhhh" response from us and nothing else.


reply posted on 15-11-2010 @ 08:03 AM by Cosmic4life
reply to post by boondock-saint



I completely agree with your scenario.

Some additional info for you.

The Chinese ballistic missile is a two-stage 60 ton missile.

The first stage is solid propellant, the second stage is liquid fueled-propellant-(unknown, possibly hydrogen/oxygen).

Keep digging Boondock-Saint.

Cosmic...


reply posted on 15-11-2010 @ 08:11 AM by boondock-saint
Originally posted by Cosmic4life
reply to
post by boondock-saint


I completely agree with your scenario.
Some additional info for you.
The Chinese ballistic missile is a two-stage 60 ton missile.
The first stage is solid propellant, the second stage is liquid fueled-propellant-(unknown, possibly hydrogen/oxygen).
Keep digging Boondock-Saint.
Cosmic...

absolutely splendid post Cosmic.
That def would explain the differences
in the textures and sizes of the plumes
in the video and pics.

However, on one of my analysis'
I noticed a green burst and I was wondering
if it had changed fuel sources at that time.
I wish I could give u more than 1 star
u deserve it for that
Pages: <<  3    4    5    6    7    8    9  >>    ^^TOP^^



Dumbing down reality
  Posted 5 days ago with 103 member flags
The 800 Pound Gorilla Everyone Ignores
  Posted 16 days ago with 67 member flags
The Illusion of Choice and Truth
  Posted 10 days ago with 52 member flags
A chronical of the BANKSTER WARS
  Posted 7 days ago with 42 member flags
Conspiracy Theory:The Lost Episode
  Posted 4 days ago with 39 member flags
666, NWO, Aliens and You!
  Posted 13 days ago with 36 member flags