Judging by the direct angle of the contrail I would have to agree with the missile statement
There is more evidence that the object was a missile including photo enhanced imaging of the flying object showing there were no wings. Hence it must be a missile. Now as for the origin who knows but my best guess would be China. Russia would be doubtful they are too busy drilling for new oil and focusing on economy right now.

Seriously? A Chinese missle? We have a 50+ page topic based on two chemtrails in the sky and we have come to the conclusion that it was a Chinese missle, that a U.S. missle was fired in retaliation, which apparently "nicked" it enough to throw it "slightly" off course. where the missle apparently went on with its unknown course, that it either exploded in the ocean or failed to detonate, etc etc etc....I guess theres no way that a plane had laid a chemtrail in one direction, and another chemtrail was laid in the opposite direction 15-20 minutes later? There are a lot more intelligent reasons for two chemtrails to be in the sky in opposite directions than this explanation.... .This is the reason many of us frequent this site less and less...

this was posted on project camolot under the blog
More on the Missile from Deagle

Incoming: "More Classified Sourced Info on the CA Missile." Apparently the missile was one of ours. I heard from Dr. Deagle on skype. The info he provided is below in italics. The evidence is mounting for the failed false flag incident... They planned to blame it on the Chinese. The failure of the software seems to be detailed below. What is clear is that this incident has not made it into the mainstream press for the most part and that since it failed it is being relegated to the conspiracy side of things. Indications are that this was handled by a portion of the military that did not have enough backing to pull it off or there was interference by an ET race who 'neutralized' the missile before it could do the damage intended. The details below were given by Dr. Deagle. This story is still developing and I have not yet had a chance to talk to him about what he has written below:

"[11/19/10 11:56:41 AM] Dr Bill Deagle MD: USA THAAD Theatre Air Defenes Missle
Lack of Stage 2 Separation - Serious Danger of Impact on Populated Area of Orange County or Los Angeles. Raytheon primary contractor - Blackmail of Codes for THAAD QRS11 company merged with Raytheon - Patent for QRS11 Guidance filed by Rose Law Firm - Hilary Clinton on Patent for THAAD Guidance Systems/ Failure of Software on Staging and Guidance the issue with THAAD off CA Coast."

I believe it was a test by the US Navy simulating a chinese missle attack or US Navy was tracking the chinese sub and attempted a defensive measure. How else would the other missle be possible? Interesting post and certainly far better than the governments alleged explanation.

Originally posted by mel1962
I believe it was a test by the US Navy simulating a chinese missle attack or US Navy was tracking the chinese sub and attempted a defensive measure. How else would the other missle be possible? Interesting post and certainly far better than the governments alleged explanation.

The 2nd missile was just BoonDocks Theory.... We still want to Government to Admit that they dropped the ball....

and I think you are giving the US NAVY to Much credit or not enough Credit to the Chinese Navy....