LA Plane Theory is blown out of the sky - US missed Chinese Missile

page: 2
151
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join

posted on Nov, 15 2010 @ 02:19 AM
link   

Originally posted by xiphias
No offense, but did you really need to credit yourself on that diagram?

it was my theory and my diagram
doesn't an artist put his name
on his artwork.

Just by chance this image is used
on another site, it can be credited
back to ATS
It started here.
Is that not worthy of a signature
and advertisement for ATS??




posted on Nov, 15 2010 @ 02:22 AM
link   
First i want to ask you, How did you determine this was a chinese missile? Lets just say it was 2 missiles. How can you say it was chinese? And to all the people thinking the chinese sub popping up during american exercises was recent, Look again and you will see that it was a few years back.

And saying the united states says it wasnt theres is funny. Do you believe everything they tell you? Do you think the chinese would risk a global war by shooting a missile in our airspace and not intend a target. You are saying it went back on track? Where did it go then. It had to land somewhere.

Or are you implying that the chinese shot it from our waters to a destination outside the u.s to make it look like we did it? Please enlighten me. I am having a hard time conceiving this.



posted on Nov, 15 2010 @ 02:23 AM
link   

Originally posted by kirkspuppet9
Why has the Chinese government not come forth and claimed it was them?

They don't want to scare Joe Public.
But they do want to scare Mr. Government
which already knows this was their missile
so there is no need to shout it in the news.
So they accomplished their goal.



posted on Nov, 15 2010 @ 02:25 AM
link   
so what was the missiles target? If this was a missile.



posted on Nov, 15 2010 @ 02:25 AM
link   

Originally posted by boondock-saint
nope, not if it was intercepted and thrown off
course.


It certainly does look like whatever caused the trail suddenly went sideways where your diagram says the explosion took place.




posted on Nov, 15 2010 @ 02:28 AM
link   

Originally posted by russ1969
Do you think the chinese would risk a global war by shooting a missile in our airspace and not intend a target. You are saying it went back on track? Where did it go then. It had to land somewhere.

Or are you implying that the chinese shot it from our waters to a destination outside the u.s to make it look like we did it? Please enlighten me. I am having a hard time conceiving this.

Yes, the Chinese are known to make warning shots
across the bow. Here's you a prime example
of where they have fired missiles before for a purpose.

www.time.com...

Yes, I am ASSUMING this missile was launched from our coast
and fired back out to sea away from the population. Where it landed,
I have no idea. And I quote the Chinese did this because they have
done it before. They fit the profile !!!! See article link above.


+2 more 
posted on Nov, 15 2010 @ 02:30 AM
link   
reply to post by NuclearPaul
 

Not if you look at the unaltered image. It's a highlighted portion of the contrail. The "second contrail" is a cloud.



posted on Nov, 15 2010 @ 02:32 AM
link   

Originally posted by NuclearPaul
It certainly does look like whatever caused the trail suddenly went sideways where your diagram says the explosion took place.

a pretty good similar scenario would be to
look at old youtube footage of the Patriot Missile
Batteries during the first Gulf War and see how
they shot down those scud missiles coming
from Saddam Hussein and you'll get a better
understanding of how the pic adds up to evidence.


+2 more 
posted on Nov, 15 2010 @ 02:34 AM
link   

Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by NuclearPaul
 

Not if you look at the unaltered image. It's a highlighted portion of the contrail. The "second contrail" is a cloud.


2nd cloud my arse

but I can always count on you
for a good laugh


that is exactly the reason why I used
the layers I used to filter out the excess
to bring to light what is NOT obvious to
the naked eye.
edit on 11/15/2010 by boondock-saint because: clarifying
edit on 11-15-2010 by Springer because: removed member centric comment



posted on Nov, 15 2010 @ 02:36 AM
link   
reply to post by boondock-saint
 



Showing off their new weapons defense in their own country. Far from coming into our waters and doing it. here is a link that explains different. www.dailymail.co.uk...

Further independent footage has now emerged showing that the ballistic missile theory is ridiculous. The cameraman who filmed the original footage admits that he filmed it for a continuous 10 minutes. No ballistic missile is going to remain in sight for that length of time.

The airliner footage fits the exact flight path and time of Boeing 757 America West Flight 808. The video footage aired on TV was edited. The independent footage shows that the contrail dissipates as the airliner approaches the coast. It then continues on an easterly heading as it transits at 37,000 feet onto to Phoenix. A weather satellite has also detected the airliner contrail.

This is an example of how edited footage, filmed with high powered optics creating foreshortening, can fool. It is a simple case of perspective.

Copy and paste the following for further analysis on the new info.

'Jet contrails from some angles look like missile trails'
- Tom, Lincs, 12/11/2010 18:21


Read more: www.dailymail.co.uk...



posted on Nov, 15 2010 @ 02:47 AM
link   
here is the Patriot Missile Battery in action
against Saddam's Scuds in Saudi Arabia.

If I'm not mistaken they have the PAC-II
newer version now. But theory is the same.




posted on Nov, 15 2010 @ 02:50 AM
link   

Originally posted by NuclearPaul
It certainly does look like whatever caused the trail suddenly went sideways where your diagram says the explosion took place.

yep, however Phage would have you believe
that's just the wind whipping the clouds and trails
around in a circular motion at the same exact
spot of the 2 contrails intersecting.



posted on Nov, 15 2010 @ 02:51 AM
link   

Originally posted by boondock-saint


3) US Launches smaller missile to intercept Chinese
missile. See how the US Missile contrail is much
smaller. It's probably a PAC-II.



several questions.

Where was the Patriot launched from, where was its radar, and do you think that they keep missiles and crews watching all the coastline 24/7?



posted on Nov, 15 2010 @ 02:53 AM
link   

Originally posted by ZELDAR
so what was the missiles target? If this was a missile.

I have no clue.
But I'm sure somebody does
and they ain't talking.



posted on Nov, 15 2010 @ 02:53 AM
link   
reply to post by boondock-saint
 



Your videos you posted clearly shows the speed of these missiles. nothing like the slow moving object we seen in the original so called missile. Did you go to the link i posted? I know, i know. Your determined to make your theory work so forget any other possibility. All im saying is if you believe the government in them telling you they didnt launch anything that day, Than you must believe them when they tell you it wasnt a missile at all.



posted on Nov, 15 2010 @ 02:56 AM
link   

Originally posted by dereks
several questions.

Where was the Patriot launched from, where was its radar, and do you think that they keep missiles and crews watching all the coastline 24/7?

I have no clue where either of these missiles
were launched from. But if you think the US
doesn't have some sort of missile defense
in place on both coast lines then you are sadly
mistaken.



posted on Nov, 15 2010 @ 02:59 AM
link   

Originally posted by boondock-saint

Originally posted by dereks
several questions.

Where was the Patriot launched from, where was its radar, and do you think that they keep missiles and crews watching all the coastline 24/7?

I have no clue where either of these missiles
were launched from. But if you think the US
doesn't have some sort of missile defense
in place on both coast lines then you are sadly
mistaken.


And if you think our military would miss there target and not shoot a second intercepting missile, You are sadly mistaken!



posted on Nov, 15 2010 @ 03:00 AM
link   
reply to post by kirkspuppet9
 


And you do not want to
see a missile, so you see contrail.
It goes both ways. Peace

The BrainGarden.



posted on Nov, 15 2010 @ 03:01 AM
link   

Originally posted by russ1969
Your videos you posted clearly shows the speed of these missiles. nothing like the slow moving object we seen in the original so called missile.

2 things to note:

1) You cannot compare oranges to apples,
we do not know how far away those scuds were
in that video.

2) We also don't know how far away the missiles
in the LA video were either.

The closer you are to these missiles the faster
they look to you. At 35+ miles away, they look
really slow. But if you were following them in
a fighter jet, it would look totally different I'm
pretty sure.



posted on Nov, 15 2010 @ 03:04 AM
link   

Originally posted by russ1969
And if you think our military would miss there target and not shoot a second intercepting missile, You are sadly mistaken!

they may have, I'm pretty sure they would have.
But since the missile was going away from the camera
then the 2nd missile interceptor would be even harder
to see than the first one and waaaay farther away out
at sea as that was the direction the first missile was
headed. Plus we do not have video footage of that part.





new topics
top topics
 
151
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join