LA Plane Theory is blown out of the sky - US missed Chinese Missile

page: 1
151
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
+99 more 
posted on Nov, 15 2010 @ 01:44 AM
link   

LA Plane Theory is blown out of the sky
US missed Chinese Missile



Well I have to admit, the old adage, a picture is worth
a thousand words is very true. I have been studying
on this event for a whole week. I think I have seen every
pic and video there is and twisted and turned every one
of those pics in an editor hoping to find the smoking
gun for this missile theory. And after a week, I found it.

The above image is from the helicopter video. It is unedited
except for color and highlight layers I took out to bring those
background contrails into better view.

As you can see, there are 2 contrails in this image.
1 big one in the foreground and 1 smaller one in the background.
And what sealed the smoking gun for me is when they
intersected each other and a big cloud of smoke where
they intersected.

This is my theory of the timeline of events.

1) Chinese launch Ballistic Missile from Jin Sub.

2) US Air Defense boards lit up like a Christmas Tree
with early warnings.

3) US Launches smaller missile to intercept Chinese
missile. See how the US Missile contrail is much
smaller. It's probably a PAC-II.

4) US Missile intercepts and explodes near Chinese
Missile but does not destroy it. But it does knock
it off it's trajectory, thus the sharp corresponding
course changes after the explosion.

5) Chinese Missile continues to target.

6) US Gov denies a missile launch cuz they
are embarrassed they didn't save America
from this aggression. Had this been designed
to inflict serious damage to the US. They would
have succeeded in penetrating American Defense.

7) Once again, the US Air Defense is red-faced.
last time it was the US Navy.

Sorry folks, it was a Chinese Missile
not US808 from Hawaii.
The second intersecting contrail confirms it,
unless you think the US is trying to shoot
down commercial airliners?



+57 more 
posted on Nov, 15 2010 @ 01:52 AM
link   
If you remove all the text it still looks like a plane to me.Imaginative diagrams do not prove anything .The contrail spreads out wider because of the conditions in the air..
edit on 15-11-2010 by tarifa37 because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 15 2010 @ 01:55 AM
link   

Originally posted by tarifa37
If you remove all the text it still looks like a plane to me.Imaginative diagrams do not prove anything .

yep, I can see why you wouldn't
want to talk about that 2nd contrail


The smoking gun baby


+15 more 
posted on Nov, 15 2010 @ 01:56 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Nov, 15 2010 @ 01:57 AM
link   
When this first happened the first thing my husband and I thought was the Chinese.
Mess with our money = warning
I read a couple of days ago that a Chinese sub showed up in the middle of a Navy exercise, I think it was. Article said that they were embarrassed, yea, I bet.
Nice work Boon, thanks for posting. I just hope for everyones sake your wrong.


+7 more 
posted on Nov, 15 2010 @ 01:57 AM
link   
reply to post by boondock-saint
 


I think that is the spread of the planes contrail which is coming from two engines.I am sure there must be examples of this in the other thread.
Edit to add this picture of a planes contrail demonstrates how the trail can spread and separate over a distance.

edit on 15-11-2010 by tarifa37 because: (no reason given)


Compare to unaltered original image
edit on 15-11-2010 by tarifa37 because: (no reason given)
edit on 15-11-2010 by tarifa37 because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 15 2010 @ 01:58 AM
link   

Originally posted by anglodemonicmatrix
reply to post by boondock-saint
 

Phage or a similar poster will eventually show up and provide countless posts trying to debunk you but if thats a jet contrail Im a monkeys uncle.

yep, they'll say that other contrail
was a later flight.

But that theory won't work for them
as the 2nd contrail ends in an explosion
and a big cloud.

Smoking gun baby


+11 more 
posted on Nov, 15 2010 @ 01:59 AM
link   
If it was a missile it would be moving way faster then what was shown in the video, (approaching several km per second). Where did the missile land and or explode? Why has the Chinese government not come forth and claimed it was them? The missile theory holds no water and the pic you have is being interpreted in a way to see what you want to see. There is no evidence.
edit on 15-11-2010 by kirkspuppet9 because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 15 2010 @ 02:00 AM
link   

Originally posted by tarifa37
reply to post by boondock-saint
 


I think that is the spread of the planes contrail which is coming from two engines

lmao

2 engine contrails on the same plane going in different directions.
hahahaha

that would be a first in aviation history !!!


+27 more 
posted on Nov, 15 2010 @ 02:01 AM
link   
That picture proved nothing be honest, there is no evidence that it is clearly a Chinese missile, Chinese missiles don't leave a unique signature therefore you can't prove that it was a Chinese missile.



posted on Nov, 15 2010 @ 02:03 AM
link   

Originally posted by kirkspuppet9
If it was a missile it would be moving way faster then what was shown in the video,

nope, not if it was intercepted and thrown off
course. Being unaligned aerodynamically
would slow it down from it's original speed.
Basically it's like a pilot when he turns
his flaps on. He slows down. Taking the missile
out of a direct straight path will slow it down.



posted on Nov, 15 2010 @ 02:04 AM
link   
Very interesting stuff!

What if the "chinese missile" has a few stages and is designed to continue on if a lower stage is hit?



posted on Nov, 15 2010 @ 02:05 AM
link   

Originally posted by MikeBoss
That picture proved nothing be honest, there is no evidence that it is clearly a Chinese missile, Chinese missiles don't leave a unique signature therefore you can't prove that it was a Chinese missile.


the US Military has already said it wasn't
theirs.



posted on Nov, 15 2010 @ 02:06 AM
link   
reply to post by boondock-saint
 



second intersecting contrail

If that's a second contrail, it seems awfully coincidental that we would have a suitable anti-missile boat in such close proximity to your submarine. Here's a video that shows your "twin trajectories" relative to ground. How close would the two points of origin have needed to be to create lines at those angles? Hundreds of feet? A few thousand?

So what sort of scenario are you proposing?

Also, watch a higher resolution video (about :09) and tell me if that still looks like a second contrail.




edit on 15-11-2010 by LordBucket because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 15 2010 @ 02:07 AM
link   

Originally posted by NuclearPaul
Very interesting stuff!

What if the "chinese missile" has a few stages and is designed to continue on if a lower stage is hit?

the Chinese D21 is a 2-stage rocket if I'm not
mistaken. The D21 is their new Carrier Killer
Missile. I am not saying that is the one
they launched. I'm just confirming what
you said that the Chinese do have multi-stage
missiles.



posted on Nov, 15 2010 @ 02:08 AM
link   
reply to post by boondock-saint
 


But where did it go? It exploded? It landed somewhere? It kept going to the moon?

If your theory proves it was a missile, what proves it was specifically a Chinese missile?

If the big lumpy part of the "contrail" is where the US missile bumped it off course, does that mean that the bottom part of the contrail is a combination of the two missiles contrails? If not, why would it be bigger at the bottom and then smaller at the top?



posted on Nov, 15 2010 @ 02:10 AM
link   

Originally posted by sickofitall2012
Nice work Boon, thanks for posting. I just hope for everyones sake your wrong.

if I'm wrong, then no harm done.
If I'm right ....
we're in deep doo doo.



posted on Nov, 15 2010 @ 02:14 AM
link   

Originally posted by fusion47
reply to post by boondock-saint
 


But where did it go? It exploded? It landed somewhere? It kept going to the moon?

If your theory proves it was a missile, what proves it was specifically a Chinese missile?

If the big lumpy part of the "contrail" is where the US missile bumped it off course, does that mean that the bottom part of the contrail is a combination of the two missiles contrails? If not, why would it be bigger at the bottom and then smaller at the top?

Only the US missile exploded in that cloud of smoke.
Look above it you can see fragments still in the air.

As far as the Chinese missile where it went.
I have no clue. Ask the Chinese or the US Missile
Defense as they tracked afterward I'm sure.

The US Gov has already denied it was theirs.
And this pic proves it was a missile so therefore
the gov is covering up the fact they missed it.
It's freaking embarrassing.



posted on Nov, 15 2010 @ 02:15 AM
link   
I have a hard time believing the contrail story. Something just seems off about it.

Likewise, I have an easy time believing there are folks who wish this was a Chinese missile for whatever reason. It could've been a missile, but there's no proof it was Chinese or even military.

No offense, but did you really need to credit yourself on that diagram?



posted on Nov, 15 2010 @ 02:17 AM
link   

Originally posted by fusion47
does that mean that the bottom part of the contrail is a combination of the two missiles contrails?

you can clearly see that the 2 contrails
came from different locations. They have
different trajectories that intersect very close
proximity and then a big cloud of smoke
where 1 contrail ends.





new topics
top topics
 
151
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join


Haters, Bigots, Partisan Trolls, Propaganda Hacks, Racists, and LOL-tards: Time To Move On.
read more: Community Announcement re: Decorum