posted on Nov, 20 2010 @ 02:17 AM
Freedom of religion is deeply misunderstood.
You have the right to believe whatever you want. How you act, however, is subject to regulation. If that action is a primarily promoted by genuine
religious impulses, then a court may question the government as to the legitimacy of its interest in denying you the right to perform your action. In
the case of "improper disposal of human remains," I can think of numerous arguments the government could present which would cause its regulation to
prevail over your last wishes. Among these, off the top of my head, are the public health issues, matters related to criminal activity, and
interference with the peaceable enjoyment of their property by those who own land near to where you wish to rot/be eaten.
None of your rights are absolute. Your right to swing your fist ends just before the tip of my nose. You do not have the right to *falsely* yell fire
in a crowded theater. (I hate that that always gets misquoted. People forget the "falsely" and make it sound like you can't yell fire when, in
fact, the theater is on fire -- which would be stupid.) And you can't form the First Church of Weed and Speed and claim the right to do all the drugs
you want. It's been tried. It doesn't work.