Let me first congratulate the OP for reminding us of this incident. I take offense at the poster who ran off at the mouth about OP not paying
attention to the current content of the site. Yes one should always check to see if the article one intends to publish , has already been covered, but
there again, if you have to search for a thread, its what we call buried, and reasonably well forgotten. Theres nothing wrong with a regular reboot of
this sort of thread.
Now, Im never one to throw water on something that someone wants to use as evidence of UFO visitation, but there are some things about the
assumptions made by the person who wrote the article that OP linked to, which frankly ruin the whole idea of the mutilation being carried out by
Aliens, or beings inside UFO or anything like that.
First, one of the key reasons I can well believe that ANIMAL mutilation could only be carried out by means that humanity does not have at its
disposal, is the sheer size of the animals in question, more specificaly cattle. They are enourmous, and to slay one of those without leaving even a
hint of forensic evidence (which is invariably the case I might add) would take not just effort, but a denial of the laws of physics. Even if you
drugged one, you wouldnt be able to catch it and prevent it making a fall mark in the ground, and yet even the falling action of a dying animal is not
represented in evidence from the scenes of mutilations that I have studied.
The difference is , with a human, one could drug a person and carry them off on one shoulder without any difficulty what so ever, aside from the risk
of being spotted. And some people are exceptionaly talented at avoiding detection. If a person used a drug which has no visible physiological effect
(like tell tale marks on organs like the liver , heart and brain for instance) but renders the victim unconscious then the coroner would not be able
to tell anything about the way the victim was incapacitated in order to allow the "work" to be done on them. None the less, its perfectly possible
to drug a person and have them either incapacitated or worse.
www.metacafe.com...
This particular video details a drug called Devils Breath, which is capable of rendering a person supplicant to any orders given to them . It can make
a person agree to go to the bank and withdraw considerable portions of thier wealth, before taking the instigator to thier home, and helping the
instigator to steal all the expensive gear from thier house.
Criminals use it to make victims supplicant, even allowing a sufficiently strong stomached gangster to steal a persons organs, while that person
smiles, and shifts position to allow better access to the fleshy bounty inside thier torsos. Now, Im not sure wether this particular chemical can be
traced in autopsy , but it proves a rule. Messed up crap can happen to a person while they are awake, without them even feeling like they ought to
fight back.
Now , moving on. Cattle are mutilated in rural areas, where the ground is invariably either soft, or at the very least, far more capable of recieving
tracks from steps taken by a possible mutilator. However, no tracks are ever found around the bodies of mutilated cattle, not even regular predetation
of animals is ever in evidence in the cases which interest the membership of this site. However in terms of how receptive to tracks, and how hard it
is to avoid leaving trackable clues, the rural environment is MUCH harder to operate a nefarious activity in without being tracked forensicaly , or at
the very least by farmers and land workers who have untold expirience of working the land , and tracking smaller animals around all day in order to
remove pests.
But in a city or suburban environment, the ground is often tough, and does not take footprints. Concrete, tarmac, stone, brick... sure, you can stain
these things, but you cannot track prints on them too easily . As long as a perpetrator keeps his feet clean, in a city , he can go about his business
as he pleases, provided he keeps to a strict forensic lockdown protocol. Wearing gloves , keeping his boots clean, and keeping any hairs and fibres in
check.
A word on blood evidence and a lack thereof in this case. Keeping in mind the points I have made about the size of the victim , and the comparative
ease with which people can be manipulated and transported, one must understand that this allows far more choice in terms of ways to dispose of them,
or work on them in private. In order to prevent blood loss , or at least the leaving of blood evidence at the murder/harvest site there are quite a
few things that can be done . First , covering the kill site (which you have chosen for its out of the way, and closed off nature) with industrial
grade tarpaulin, and damp seal the seams between tarp sections. Then ensure the body has gone through one of two procedures. Either freeze, or
heavily chill the body, so that the blood refuses to move around the body. This will prevent blood being thrown all over the place when the body is
violated to allow the suction apperatus access to the torso , and will prevent blood from seeping all over the shop when the lazer is done with its
work on the facial damage.
The other way , would be to use some coagulant chemical on your victim , so that again the blood does not flow at all whilst you work on the
subject. Of course where the chemical method is concerned, you would have to ensure that the chemical did not come up in autopsy, either directly , or
by evidence left on the body itself, like strange effects on arteries and so on.
Basicaly , there are loads of interesting ways to kill people, but cattle are too big to be killed with such ease, and without leaving a mark
anywhere in evidence ... With people however, there are literaly hundreds of ways I can think of to do the job, and Im not even a psychopath ...
imagine how much easier this thought process would be for a PROPER sicko?