It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Now you're just being silly. The point here is, if something is disruptive, it needs to be eliminated. Whatever it is. Police carry guns, too. Should the children be permitted their 2nd Amendment rights on school grounds?
Originally posted by JIMC5499
The moron who tried to compare this to the Second Amendment need their head examined.
Originally posted by yeahright
Try grasping the point before slinging the insults, mmmkay?
Originally posted by yeahright
The following is my opinion as a member participating in this discussion.
And there you go.
I have great sympathy for the school. I know exactly what the principal means. One kid does A then another will do B in response until it escalates. School is for learning. Whatever distracts from that should be excluded.
As an ATS Staff Member, I will not moderate in threads such as this where I have participated as a member.
Justice Fortas noted that the actions taken by the three students had not been disruptive or aggressive. The protest was a "silent, passive expression of opinion," that had led to the suspension of only five students out of the 18,000 enrolled in the Des Moines schools. Though a few hostile comments had been made to the students who were wearing armbands, there had been no threats or acts of violence. Based on this factual record, Fortas found puzzling the district court's finding that the school had reasonable grounds for barring the armbands. The principals may have had general and nonspecific fears of a disturbance, but such fears were not sufficient to overcome the students' First Amendment rights. He pointed out that any departure from the normal school regimen was liable to cause trouble. However, the risk of a word or symbolic expression causing a disturbance was the "sort of hazardous freedom" that made the country strong and vigorous. The school system could not ban a particular expression of opinion unless it could show its actions were based on more than the "mere desire to avoid the discomfort and unpleasantness that always accompany an unpopular viewpoint."
Now I'm a multiracial American citizen. I do find patriotism to be a menace to society. Yet this boy should be able to fly his flags
"Our Hispanic, you know, kids will, you know, bring their Mexican flags and they'll display it, and then of course the kids would do the American flag situation, and it does cause kind of a racial tension which we don't really want," Parraz said. "We want them to appreciate the cultures."