It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
How much does the typical American family make? This question is probably one of the most central in figuring out how we can go about fixing our current economic malaise. After all, we don’t hear many people saying in today’s world that they have too much money.
The median household income in the United States is $46,326. Here in California people have a hard time understanding that yes, 50 percent of our population live on $46,000 or less a year. Even today, all the elixirs and remedies being thrown around fail to focus on income and the big brother of income, solid employment. Dual earner households have a higher median income at $67,348.
17.8% of all U.S. households make more than $118,200 a year. Only 2.67% make more than $200,000. The fact that only 34% make more than $65,000 is astounding given how expensive other cost of living items have gotten over the past decade. That is why the middle class is feeling squeezed from all different sides.
When I put together a budget for a family making $100,000 I received a bit of feedback on both sides. Even though I realized very few people had household incomes in the 6 figure range looking very closely at the data, I can understand why people took issue with a budget that was at that level. I also put together a budget from someone living in California making $46,000 a year and received feedback as well. I think when it comes to income, you can never have too much.
What is even more fascinating, is how even amongst the super wealthy income is not distributed evenly. There are approximately 146,000 (0.1%) households with incomes exceeding $1,500,000 a year. Even at that, the top 0.01% of households had incomes of $5,500,000 and accounted for 11,000 households. The 400 highest tax payers in the nation brought in a stunning $87,000,000 a year. Now that is wealth.
For us mere mortals, it is important again to focus on that chart. $46,000 does not go a long way. In a recent Census report there are 110,000,000 households in the United States. What this data tells us is that 55,000,000 households are living on $46,000 or less a year. Let us assume this is a married couple with 1 child. Let us run the numbers:
17.8% of all U.S. households make more than $118,200 a year. Only 2.67% make more than $200,000. The fact that only 34% make more than $65,000 is astounding given how expensive other cost of living items have gotten over the past decade. That is why the middle class is feeling squeezed from all different sides.
When I put together a budget for a family making $100,000 I received a bit of feedback on both sides. Even though I realized very few people had household incomes in the 6 figure range looking very closely at the data, I can understand why people took issue with a budget that was at that level. I also put together a budget from someone living in California making $46,000 a year and received feedback as well. I think when it comes to income, you can never have too much.
What is even more fascinating, is how even amongst the super wealthy income is not distributed evenly. There are approximately 146,000 (0.1%) households with incomes exceeding $1,500,000 a year. Even at that, the top 0.01% of households had incomes of $5,500,000 and accounted for 11,000 households. The 400 highest tax payers in the nation brought in a stunning $87,000,000 a year. Now that is wealth.
For us mere mortals, it is important again to focus on that chart. $46,000 does not go a long way. In a recent Census report there are 110,000,000 households in the United States. What this data tells us is that 55,000,000 households are living on $46,000 or less a year. Let us assume this is a married couple with 1 child. Let us run the numbers:
17.8% of all U.S. households make more than $118,200 a year. Only 2.67% make more than $200,000. The fact that only 34% make more than $65,000 is astounding given how expensive other cost of living items have gotten over the past decade. That is why the middle class is feeling squeezed from all different sides.
When I put together a budget for a family making $100,000 I received a bit of feedback on both sides. Even though I realized very few people had household incomes in the 6 figure range looking very closely at the data, I can understand why people took issue with a budget that was at that level. I also put together a budget from someone living in California making $46,000 a year and received feedback as well. I think when it comes to income, you can never have too much.
What is even more fascinating, is how even amongst the super wealthy income is not distributed evenly. There are approximately 146,000 (0.1%) households with incomes exceeding $1,500,000 a year. Even at that, the top 0.01% of households had incomes of $5,500,000 and accounted for 11,000 households. The 400 highest tax payers in the nation brought in a stunning $87,000,000 a year. Now that is wealth.
For us mere mortals, it is important again to focus on that chart. $46,000 does not go a long way. In a recent Census report there are 110,000,000 households in the United States. What this data tells us is that 55,000,000 households are living on $46,000 or less a year. Let us assume this is a married couple with 1 child. Let us run the numbers:
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/dbfc73c5e355.png[/atsimg]
I ran the numbers for a state with no state income taxes, Texas. A family at this level is only bringing in $3,215 a month. The national median home price peaked around $200,000. So let us assume this family purchased the median home:
5% down payment: $10,000
Mortgage 30-year fixed (6.5%): $1,200
Taxes and Insurance: $333
PITI: $1,533
Right off the bat, this family is spending 47% of their net pay on a median priced home. We didn’t even account for any pre-tax retirement account investing. Given the recent stock market performance and the loss of $50 trillion in global wealth, maybe that wasn’t such a bad idea. The bottom line is the average American family is being squeezed from every angle. What we need is a focus on jobs and our economy, not bailing out banks. That defeats the entire purpose. The average American family is struggling getting by and when they hear about these billion dollar handouts, they can’t help but to feel left out.
Source: fedupusa.org...
Average vs. Median Cost - What Does it All Mean?
Here are some basic definitions to help clear things up:
•Median home price -- This is the price of a house that falls in the middle (or median) of all homes sold. In other words, half of the homes in the area will sell for more than this amount, and half will sell for less. Most journalists and data compilers refer to the median price when issuing reports.
•Average home price -- This is when you add up all of the home prices in a given area (a city, state or the entire country) and then divide that total by the number of houses sold.
Both of the statistics above use the actual sale price of a home. They do not use the seller's asking price, because these numbers are not relevant or useful. The only thing that matters is what the home actually sold for, and that is what determines both the median and average cost of properties in a given area.
The challenge is that some data sources provide one or the other, while other sources provide both numbers. It would be nice if publishers could use one standard across the board, but that's not going to happen. So in this article, we will simply label everything with average or median.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average Price Data, 2006 - 2009
Here are some historical figures from the Census Bureau, showing the average sale price of homes sold in the U.S.
•2006 - $305,900
•2007 - $313,600
•2008 - $292,600
•2009 - Not yet available
Let me put these numbers in perspective. If you look at the average sale prices dating back to 1963, you will notice that the price almost always rises from one year to the next. It's usually a very gradual rise, too. But starting in the late 1990s, average home costs / prices began to rise at a quicker pace, and then they dropped in 2007 -- and plummeted in 2008 - 2009. This is a classic pattern of real estate bubbles. But this time, the bubble imploded like it has not done in decades. You remember the housing market crash, mortgage crisis and economic recession, don't you? This is why home prices are much lower today (in many cities) than they were just a few years ago. Good news for home buyers, bad news for homeowners.
Source: www.homebuyinginstitute.com...
Cost of living in Bulgaria - food and drink
Staples such as bread, rice, pasta and flour are about one quarter of the UK price. Dairy products and seasonal fruits and vegetables are typically half. Pork, chicken and lamb can be served in a home in Bulgaria for only 20% of the UK price. Some examples of costs:
•Home and contents insurance, annual 100 GBP.
•Internet connection, monthly 15 GBP
•Electricity, annual 150 GBP
•Gas, annual 85 GBP
•Water, annual 25 GBP
•Local tax and rubbish collection, annual 20 GBP
•10 eggs 0.50 GBP
•250g jar instant coffee 2.50 GBP
•Box of cornflakes 0.80 GBP
•250g butter 0.35 GBP
•1lb sausages 0.70 GBP
•1.5litres of mineral water 0.20 GBP
•1lb potatoes 0.12 GBP
•1litre milk 0.40 GBP
•large loaf 0.40 GBP
•1lb apples 0.18 GBP
•0.5 litre of beer 0.40 GBP
•1kg chicken breast 1.60 GBP
•English language local newspaper 0.10 GBP
•200 ml shampoo 1.10 GBP
•Toothpaste 0.30 GBP
•3kg box washing powder 1.90 GBP
•Roll of toilet tissue 0.20 GBP
•Hair dryer 15 GBP
•Steam iron 32 GBP
•Men´s 100% cotton shirt 18 GBP
•Pair of jeans (adult) 16 GBP
The low cost of living in Bulgarian property is one of the country´s great attractions. However, prices are rising, and will continue to do so after the country becomes a member of the EU in 2007/8, so you need to budget for higher costs if you are planning to live in your home in Bulgaria.
Source: bulgaria.overseas-homes-direct.com...
Originally posted by byteshertz
My first point is someone can work just as hard working 14 hour days moping floors but get payed $30k a year
Originally posted by byteshertz
My second point is for every dollar you earn someone else must give that wealth up directly by transfer of money or through inflation - in order for you to move up, you must hold someone else down.
Originally posted by Chett
So much gloom and doom
- world is going down
- greed
- gluttony
etc etc
Actually I think once the stupid gov gets its hands out of all our collective pockets and off our collective backs people will be much more generous. How can the natural inclinations of most to be kind and giving work correctly when we are trained from our first day of work that the gov will take a huge 'share' of you earnings and give it to whom it pleases? I love giving. When I have the choice, most people I know give - money, time, skills ...it feels good.
How good do you feel on Apr 15? Or any payday if you actually look at your pay check.?
Originally posted by byteshertz
When you make money, directly or indirectly, you have to take that wealth from someone else.
Originally posted by ElevenFlint
Originally posted by Chett
So much gloom and doom
- world is going down
- greed
- gluttony
etc etc
Actually I think once the stupid gov gets its hands out of all our collective pockets and off our collective backs people will be much more generous. How can the natural inclinations of most to be kind and giving work correctly when we are trained from our first day of work that the gov will take a huge 'share' of you earnings and give it to whom it pleases? I love giving. When I have the choice, most people I know give - money, time, skills ...it feels good.
How good do you feel on Apr 15? Or any payday if you actually look at your pay check.?
And what do you suggest should be done in order the "stupid gov" to get its hands off our pockets? Its each and everyone of us who support this government with our everyday actions. As long as you see things separately you'll be missing the point. Because there is no "poor us" vs. "evil them" also it's not capable vs uncapable. Every single action does matter - you don't live in an isolated system!
Originally posted by byteshertz
reply to post by civilchallenger
I would not limit people to $200k - because there are so many factors to consider such as living cost of the area etc, I would actually just limit the ways in which money is produced and put caps on total wealth not income, but I myself see flaws in this - as stated previously I dont have the answers but I see a huge problem than is exponentially getting worse . I am just simply trying to point out that people think they deserve huge sums of money thinking they have somehow worked harder or more intelligently than others when infact this is often not the case. I used an example of someone who earned 1.5billion dollars in 2007 could not possibly deserve this much wealth because this is the equivlent of paying 50,000 people a income of $30,000 over a year - they can not possibly believe they work harder than those people combined - no matter how rare their skills are.
If I was to rewrite this post I would have taken it from a totally diffent angle and left my attention grabbing $200k title out of it. But you live you learn.edit on 11-11-2010 by byteshertz because: (no reason given)edit on 11-11-2010 by byteshertz because: (no reason given)