Help ATS with a contribution via PayPal:
learn more

Mysterious Missile Launch Over California - 11/8/2010

page: 6
354
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join

posted on Nov, 9 2010 @ 11:16 AM
link   
reply to post by windwaker
 

May it was a missle test from out of Vandengburg AFB, in the early 90's they were notorious for test firing missle's without letting anyone know.




posted on Nov, 9 2010 @ 11:16 AM
link   
Contrails don't happen at such low attitude. It could be a plane with additional rockets for some kind of test, etc.
But, since those who should know what it was are in denial, I think this is obviously some kind of show going on.
Or a mistake.



posted on Nov, 9 2010 @ 11:19 AM
link   
I don't think it's a jet. This is looking out towards the west, north of Catalina. Jets take off over the ocean that way from LAX but are fairly elevated by that point. It seems they climb to elevation (from my personal experience) quickly so you would not see a jet out there over the horizon just starting to climb. Well, never seen it this way before, anyhow.



posted on Nov, 9 2010 @ 11:20 AM
link   
Please excuse me if this was already answered (I have skimmed the responses but may have missed it), but has anyone stated where the missile WENT? I must assume that it didn't just vanish into thin air.



posted on Nov, 9 2010 @ 11:22 AM
link   
The only thing I can think of is nobody has reported these missiles coming down anywhere so there is only two possibilities. Missiles went into the sea, or they were space based weapons launches. They did divulge a few months ago when they launched a robotic space plane, but no other info was given. they have now moved on to covert space plane launches and we know that large rockets can be launched from sea. They have launched satelites for years from a floating platform down near south america.



posted on Nov, 9 2010 @ 11:22 AM
link   
Most likely, this was the "starting gun" for a "game." Consider the game now commenced. Be wary, for when the giant, invisible elephants dance, the mice should vacate.

In all likelihood, the a good explanation is that TPTB's watches are now synchronized. Keep vigilant for other "signs" and "coincidences" forthcoming. Also, realize that *coincidence* is a glimpse into a pattern otherwise hidden.

We just got a glimpse into a larger, currently veiled "pattern." Something is amiss. The game is afoot. Be ready...



posted on Nov, 9 2010 @ 11:25 AM
link   
reply to post by james404
 


"I shot an arrow into the air,
It fell to earth, I knew not where;
For, so swiftly it flew, the sight
Could not follow it in its flight"

hahah, a little culture for everyone today.



posted on Nov, 9 2010 @ 11:26 AM
link   
reply to post by Phage
 


tsk tsk - Phage are you really saying it could be an aircraft to rebuke another posting, or

you really think it was an aircraft?

Your Tromso analysis was spot on - a missile test , so I'm perplexed.

Why would the news chopper video this if it were a jet liner. It looks vertical and ballistic to me.

Did I misunderstand?

(and where did this impact, if a missile?)



posted on Nov, 9 2010 @ 11:27 AM
link   
i am watching foxnews right now they are now talking about it as unexplained missle pentagon is denying everything of course so something is deffently going on they dont want to talk about


reply to post by windwaker
 



posted on Nov, 9 2010 @ 11:29 AM
link   

Originally posted by ajniss
i am watching foxnews right now they are now talking about it as unexplained missle pentagon is denying everything of course so something is deffently going on they dont want to talk about


reply to post by windwaker
 





Yeah, something that I find strange is that the MSM seems to be trying to get to the bottom of this... usually, if the Pentagon wants something covered up, they will create a story, and the news will report the story the Pentagon feeds them. "Oh, it was a mis-identified plane. Nothing to see here folks." There is nothing like that in the MSM right now (to my knowledge)... it strikes me as odd.



posted on Nov, 9 2010 @ 11:29 AM
link   
reply to post by tla37
 


The smoke trail was 35 miles west of LA, over the ocean, not from the Vandenberg AFB.

From the video, it was evidently angled westerly out over the ocean. Orbital missile launches are almost always to the East because it takes less thrust to go to orbit "with" the boost of the Earth's rotation. Westerly launches have to over come that handicap.

Personally, I'm angling toward a show of force for the folks in Asia. Questioin: Can a sub-launched ICMB from off the coast of LA reach any part of Asia? Of course, it wouldn't be allowed to go that far, but the actual distance it did travel would be telling to those possibly on the other end at some point. Aren't sub ICMB millsiles much smaller tha out silo missiles?

edit on 9-11-2010 by Aliensun because: word correction



posted on Nov, 9 2010 @ 11:31 AM
link   
What if they say it came from an Iranian Sub?



posted on Nov, 9 2010 @ 11:31 AM
link   
now fox is talking about it www.foxnews.com...



reply to post by windwaker
 



posted on Nov, 9 2010 @ 11:31 AM
link   
Pentagon not alarmed - they don't want anyone to panic and they darn well know whats going on here!!!!
Waiting for more crap from TPTB!!!!!



posted on Nov, 9 2010 @ 11:34 AM
link   
im telling you folks this is getting weirder and weirder on the likes of a James Bond or Marvel story and by this I mean our dear old world



posted on Nov, 9 2010 @ 11:34 AM
link   
reply to post by crazydaisy
 


YEP!!! They know exactly where it came from and who did it!



posted on Nov, 9 2010 @ 11:37 AM
link   

Originally posted by Phage
This isn't the first time this sort of thing has occurred.
December 31, 2009:

Mystery deepens with video of ‘launch’ off O.C.

sciencedude.ocregister.com...

Another one, in Key West, talked about here:
(VIDEO LINK - omitted to declutter post)

Looks like a jet contrail to me. A missile gets going quite a bit faster than that.


YES IT DOES look SLOWER than a typical ICBM, but still has a vertical 1st leg,

then a 2nd leg arc.......which begs the question then

was this an orbital hybrid craft ?? - alluded to in the post from the Arizona Nov 5th 'launch'

from Luke AFB? Link HERE

(EXCERPTED)".. I told him what I saw and said this had to be rocket powered. He simply said, "your'e correct. You do know they're retiring the space shuttle, right?" and I replied, "yes". He said, well, what you saw is the latest technology, it is rocket powered and it is orbital. It is to replace the space shuttle."
edit on 11/9/2010 by drphilxr because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 9 2010 @ 11:37 AM
link   
reply to post by PatriotsPride
 


OK. Maybe it was a Chinese sub that launched a missile (seaward) as a show of force to us. That makes more sense than anything else given the denial from the military. (You know, like they deny UFOs.)
edit on 9-11-2010 by Aliensun because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 9 2010 @ 11:39 AM
link   

Originally posted by Helig
Did a little poking around and via comments elsewhere it looks like the missile could have been a test shot from San Nicolas Island which just happens to be a missile test facility run by the Air Force, which would nicely explain why Vandenburg said they didn't put anything up and the Navy said they did no launches either. Its a lot less scary a concept than a foreign nation letting one off the chain near our border (and well within the 200 mile buffer zone) but the simplest explanation seems to be the right one in many cases.


yeah we have a problem with telling people when we do things. it will be like 5 days later "hey we launched a missile a couple of days ago..."

"oh so thats what that was"

that would be the supervisors for ya



posted on Nov, 9 2010 @ 11:40 AM
link   
reply to post by Aliensun
 


Yes it does make sence..Look out everyone the Chinese are here to collect on our debt!!LOL





new topics

top topics



 
354
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join