Amazing "60 Minutes New Zealand" segment: Family Chooses Life - Medical Establishment Chooses Deat

This is an amazing story (amazing for a few different reasons) about one family's struggle with medical authorities over their refusal to administer a simple therapy.

Take a look at this "60 Minutes New Zealand" video segment as a family fights with everything they have to save the life of their loved one.


www.3news.co.nz...


Not only did the medical establishment unanimously agree that the simple therapy is useless, the entire medical staff was in agreement that the individual should be taken off life support and "be allowed to die".

Watch in amazement as they reject an extremely simple procedure over and over again (which saves his life in the end).

This is the type of ignorance and arrogance we must understand when it comes to the medical establishment and their methods of procedure for chronic diseases.

If you haven't had a chance to watch the above clip in the first post, I would certainly recommend it as one that should not be missed. Share it widely.

I've spoken here before about the unknown miraculousness of high dose INTRAVENOUS vitamin C (unknown to the medical establishment that is).

What you need to know is that there are thousands of studies done that prove high doses of nutrients cure disease. What you also need to know is that the United States National Library of Medicine refuses to index them. They are essentially blacklisted from your medical professionals.

Here's a short 2 minute video on the implications and efficacy of high dose INTRAVENOUS vitamin C. This time in relation to cancer.



(again, please don't by pass the first video - it's too important to pass up)

Oh, things that really help - they don't want. They want things that look like they're helping, but cause other issues that they can then "help" with other things that cause other things and so on.

The "Run From the Cure" film (google it, I have too little online time [sigh]) makes it VERY clear that the establishment wants to sicken us for profit.

Not sure if true, but i would always accept there is plenty of ignorant peopel in the medical profession. Just passed there degrees and they know it all, lol.

I appreciate they know alot and are taught and worked hard, but that does not mean they should be closed minded.

Originally posted by Amaterasu

Oh, things that really help - they don't want.

Conventionally trained medical professionals will address your symptoms and they will do so with drugs and surgery, but they will NOT investigate existing, alternative methods of remedying the disease and curing it all together. Our medical professionals simply have not been given the tools nor the education required to address these problems in the manner required.

In the end, they are as much a victim as we are. Their trained and limited view of where “reputable sources may be allowed to exist” is at the heart of their brainwashing. Sometimes they are even more so victims then ourselves because their mental fortitude has been that coerced over many years of establishment indoctrination that they cannot consider important information like that presented in the OP as factual or possible in anyway shape or form. They could never believe (due to conditioning and practice) that answers to many fatal and debilitating conditions and diseases could be solved by what a laymen could easily understand and implement. To even suggest that the medical establishment’s approach to chronic disease is completely wrong is sacrilege. I’ve witnessed the close-mindedness and absolute refusal to consider facts first hand among some former MD friends I once had.

However I know they should not be inherently blamed for their ignorance on the fact that they are used as status quo gatekeepers and public authority figures put in place by a system that has been thoroughly implanted to protect the flow of profit at all costs. They can be blamed however, for never considering, researching and looking into information that contradicts their “professional training”. For this, we all suffer the consequences.

They are wonderful at putting you back together after becoming mangled in a car crash, but for treating chronic disease they are abhorrently miss-informed, enabling and a big part of the problem.

Vitamin C and the Law

We, as patients, have the right to any therapy that is not prohibitively expensive, established to be effective, and not prohibitively toxic.

Any physician, or panel of hospital-based physicians, that claim intravenous vitamin C is experimental, unapproved, of no value, or posing unwarranted risks to the health of the patient, is demonstrating a complete and total ignorance and denial of scientific literature.

A doctor does have the right to refuse to see or treat you. A doctor does not have the right to deny you any therapy that is inexpensive and and nontoxic. Ultimately there is no defense for a doctor withholding valid treatment, especially when that information can be easily accessed.

While a hospital may or may not have a legal right to tell its doctors what they may or may not do, the patient and the family of the patient have the legal right to sue that hospital for any negative outcome that is perceived to directly result from such interference in patient care (like the case in the OP video).

The patient and the family of the patient also have the right to sue any physician that refuses to administer an inexpensive, nontoxic therapy that is established to be of use in the medical literature, such as intravenous vitamin C, especially when no other options other than permitting the patient to die are offered (like the case in the OP video).

Doctors have a very strong herd mentality, and they do not do well when forced to deal with a lawsuit alone; which would seriously question why an approved medicine such as intravenous vitamin C was withheld from the patient.

It is a very common defense for the hospital administration to suggest that "further studies" are required. Of course more information is always useful, but vitamin C has already been researched more than any other supplement, or even most pharmaceutical drugs, in the history of the planet. We should not allow another 70 years of research to go by before its proper use and administration begins.

If we are using the conventional allopathic system we should always try to make an alliance with our doctor and avoid an adversarial relationship if at all possible. Theoretically, if the doctor really wants to do what is best for the patient and is not more concerned with being told what to do, a lot of stress and conflict can be avoided by everyone. However, never hesitate to let your doctor know directly that you will avail yourself of all your rights or your family member's rights as a patient to optimal health care if so forced.

Certainly as is the case in the second video/second post regarding cancer and the use of intravenous vitamin C; this topic is becoming increasingly pressing and relevant to all of us as instances of cancer rates continue to climb. At this stage, and still unfortunately, it's our responsibility to become informed about treatments for chronic disease rather than just believing that "trust" in medical authority decisions is our best option.

This video comes in response to the 60 MINUTES report (in the OP) on the New Zealand man pulled back from death's door after his family insisted the hospital use intravenous Vitamin C. Of course, the hospital staff refuted and unanimously recommended pulling the plug and removing the man from life support; that is, until the family invoked their rights...

Dr. Bruce Dooley, talks about his 20 years of experience using intravenous vitamin C on thousands of patients. He also discusses legislative action taken and how it changed patient rights and the law in Florida.