posted on Nov, 8 2010 @ 01:47 PM
reply to post by scoobyrob
Thanks for posting that, the second link works.
"One billion years after the Big Bang, the gas we measured was a 'cool' 8,000 degrees Celsius. By three and a half billion years the
temperature had climbed to at least 12,000 degrees Celsius."
Those temperatures sound pretty high. I thought the universe was about 3000K after
the big Bang:
www.wwheaton.com...
But apparently they are looking at some specific gas and not the temperature of the universe. If the gas they looked at was being accelerated by
getting sucked into black holes, that would heat it up, so it could have a logical explanation like that.
The article talking about one billion years after the big bang got me thinking. That would be a little over 13 billion years ago. So let's say we
look at quasars in opposite directions, that are each 13+ billion light years of lookback time.
Those two quasars were 26+ billion light years apart 13+ billion years ago. If the universe was only a little over 1 billion years old, how could
those two quasars already be 26+ billion light years apart? All the matter in the universe was only about the size of a fist when inflation ended
according to this site:
van.physics.illinois.edu...
That means even after inflation, the universe must have been expanding at 13 times the speed of light even after inflation? I don't know about that,
if true it's pretty mind boggling. If the quasars were moving at close to the speed of light, they would only be 2 billion light years apart after 1
billion years (if space wasn't expanding).