It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Mass Sighting of triangle formation over Pennsylvania 10/23/10

page: 2
3
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 6 2010 @ 04:51 PM
link   
reply to post by FoxBenBen
 


i think the trick is to look at how many flags a person has
many debunkers have little or no flags because they dont start threads
they are only here to derail threads
it takes more to start a thread than to post crap on one

so your already doing better than alot of non beleivers
dont fall into the trap of worrying about people that arent interested in discusions
you are the one with your eyes open

they are the ones with there minds closed

here is my favourite thing to say to debunkers

a closed mind is like a fixed point it doesent go far

keep up the good work

XPLodER



posted on Nov, 6 2010 @ 05:58 PM
link   
reply to post by XPLodER
 


In all fairness, OP did wonder if it was balloons him/herself. Just because someone posts their opinion that it may be balloons or something non UFOish doesn't make them non-believers... just non-believers in this sighting as a UFO. Would you prefer that every UFO thread that's posted only had people respond who thought that it was a UFO? What good would that do?

We're all trying to wrestle this together, you know.



posted on Nov, 6 2010 @ 06:18 PM
link   
reply to post by Iamonlyhuman
 


i am trying to inspire the guy because lets face it
debunkers can be harsh
its hard enough to post without feeling like your being attacked evertime someone debunks
im not a hard core beleiver but i am a beleiver
and i think that when people are quick to judge they may miss and in turn cause others to miss something
trick is all have to make up there own minds
and people who dont or cant beleive
become a reason not to post

we as beleivers are considered to be less logical or not as smart
truth is subjective to the observer
and if we allow people to be rude aggresive or post the same explination over and over
the belevers opinion gets missed

i have taken alot of flack latley for wanting to see if footage like this is important

IMHO some are here to debunk because of their own personal need to be in control
this does nothing to add to the thread or stimulate our members to post

members with no stars are usually provocatures who try to prevent people from posting for their own benifit

my take on the footage is that this is a new class of ufo
it has been seen around the world
i know "balloons" but if they were small autonimous vechicles and round they would look like ballons
so is this a careful camoflage or just ballons?

no one person can say for sure but some of these objects fly in patterens and are co-ordinated
so one size ballons doesnt fit all sightings

really its up to the observer to be correct
xploder



new topics
 
3
<< 1   >>

log in

join