reply to post by PatriotsPride
Oh, for chissakes!!!!
news.bbc.co.uk...
Bush the 43rd. 2003. Visit to the UK. (Major difference, in terms of Navy defenses is, the British Royal Navy can be
trusted to
augment the U.S. security concerns).
Can you say the same about the (cough, cough)
Indian "navy"???
You DO realize where Pakistan is, right? In relation (geographically) to India?
You DO realize what is happening, in that part of the world?
You DO realize that the levels of security, for U.S. Presidents when they travel, is not unusual, but in many cases is enhanced because of the
locations visited? Gee, whiz.......
Ya know.....IF (in an alternate universe) John McCain had won the election n 2008, do you think the level of security for HIM would be any different,
for the same itinerary? What would be different, is the extreme right-wing NOISE MACHINE wouldn't be stirring people up. I know the article isn't
from that source, but you must admit the FAKE "outrage" is being instigated from the same sorts who will take
any opportunity to inflame
their "base". Counting on the lemming-like tendency to just get "mad as hell", right on cue. Sad.
edit on 4 November 2010 by weedwhacker
because: (no reason given)
