Apparently there are different motives for an interest in this thread.
Some focus obsessively on symbolic dates, maybe thinking that a prophecy is more important than the event at issue.
Others focus on the fact that a warning from a prophecy might be able to bring us advance knowledge as well as stimulate a better understand of
those factors leading to an event, in view of preventing it if at all possible.
A few gripe that ATS shouldn't allow its members to discuss this subject.
Missile interpreted here as Military GESTICULATION by the USA
Yet ATS member HollowJacket says in another thread that the launch off the California Coast was NOT an American Missile. We're possibly living in
'borderline' times regarding potential nuclear strikes. I sure as all heck hope that nothing occurs, who cares about a prediction or who is right in
a discussion when human lives are at stake?
There is notwithstanding a very serious situation going down at this time as the United States is on the verge of seeing the Dollar being dumped
worldwide and replaced by a new reference currency. The stakes are rising while various parties are upping the ante in the military geostrategic
Originally posted by HollowJacket
If this has already been posted here forgive me:
China fired missle of California coast?
China flexed its military muscle Monday evening in the skies west of Los Angeles when a Chinese Navy Jin class ballistic missile nuclear
submarine, deployed secretly from its underground home base on the south coast of Hainan island, launched an intercontinental ballistic missile from
international waters off the southern California coast. WMR’s intelligence sources in Asia, including Japan, say the belief by the military commands
in Asia and the intelligence services is that the Chinese decided to demonstrate to the United States its capabilities on the eve of the G-20 Summit
in Seoul and the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit in Tokyo.
Expert says no doubt it was
a missile off the
"It’s a solid propellant missile," he told the Times. "You can tell from the efflux [smoke]." If Richardson is right, and his resume leads one
to believe that he may be, several questions arise, all of them troubling. The first is, who is responsible? An obvious, and likely answer is
SOURCE: Mysterious Missile Launch Over California 11/8/2010
Next the Pentagon issues a denial relayed by CBS News, literally taking us for turkeys by calling it an airplane. Check out that plume and tell me
that's a plane.
CBS News on November 9th, 2010
On November 9th, 2010 the local news station in Los Angeles which filmed the missile contacted consulted their network's military expert who said it
had been clearly fired from the sea and that its large plume indicated it must be an intercontinental ballistic missile. The page in the following
link has some of the original video footage form a KCBS Sky2 Helicopter including, one third of the way through, the missile's vertical trajectory
visibly launched FROM THE SEA. Scroll down on the same page for the audio interview of a Military Analyst presenting his conclusions.
KCBS News on November 9th, 2010
But the Pentagon would have sufficient surveillance to either prevent an enemy submarine from reaching its coastline in this way, or at minimum all
the military might of the United States would be able to retaliate and take out a submarine after it had fired. Either the Pentagon is lying, half
way, as it would have been a US submarine and missile, but maybe not lying entirely:
Another scenario becomes plausible when assessing the level of infiltration of rogue groups embedded within the US Military as has been
demonstrated by the 9/11 False Flag attack. This may well have been a launch from an American submarine, one not vetted or initiated by the usual
hierarchy but one ordered by the underground leadership of the United States' SECRET GOVERNMENT.
Regardless of the exact dates shown in the Simpsons, we can only recognize that this episode which aired some six months prior appeared to highlight
serious False Flag risks at an extremely dangerous period in world history, with November 2010 presenting heightened dangers for global political
stability as well as a menace of escalation to World War III. Hopefully some will have stepped up to the situation and are presently at task,
preventing the worst. If there is enough resistance to a military 'solution' to today's crisis, then a False Flag attack wouldn't be effective and
would therefore not be launched.
edit on 13-11-2010 by Getsmart because: I added an extra video link