If "Global Warming" were not a hoax, then why would scientists have to fudge their data to prove it? ...The results should speak for themselves,
should they not? I think scientists have done more DAMAGE to your cause than advanced it by manipulating data like this and getting caught.
...If "Global Warming" were not a hoax, why would it's proponents make a concerted effort to go away from the term "Global Warming" and now just call
it a more ambiguous "Climate Change" instead. (and it USED to be called "Anthropogenic Global Warming" until they dropped THAT first part too)
If "Global Warming" were not a hoax, why do temperature models from the past 10 to 15 years show a global climate that has actually remained quite
If "Global Warming" were not a hoax, why has the table been set so that the "1%ers" of this planet stand to gain the most monetarily from its'
advancement? (doing even more damage to your cause)
Even Al Gore, the "inventor of the internet" himself, in all his "Global Warming" zeal leading the charge with his film "An Inconvenient Truth" (a
documentary where many "inconvenient truths" were found "inconveniently false") has damaged your cause.
Listen. We all want a cleaner environment. Cleaner running fuels. More efficient automobiles. Cleaner air. A greener planet. Etc... Etc... Etc...
Doesn't matter what side of the fence we're on regarding "Global Warming", I think most here would be lying if they said they didn't. But trying to
get us there by alarming the world populace with false tales of a planet warming at an out of control rate is not the right way to go about it.
Slapping an overbearing "Kyoto Protocol" on the developed world is not the way to do it either.
This planet's climate is changing. It's been doing it for millions of years. It will continue to do it for millions more. Back in the 70's they
thought we were entering an ice age!!! It is the height of human arrogance and elitism to think we have anything to do with it one way or another. It
is also not surprising as this is human nature. To add the word "anthropogenic" to any NATURAL occurrence on this planet is ridiculous to me. Are
earthquakes anthropogenic? Hurricanes? Tornados? Volcanos? ...Did they all just start happening when humans came onto the scene? I'll go with probably
not. In fact, there are UN-falsified records to prove it! Just as there are UN-falsified records of a planet which has gone through hot and cold
climate cycles for millions of years more extreme than anything we're experiencing now.
I think most who are posting in this thread have their minds made up one way or the other on this subject, so there won't be any flipping of their
beliefs on the matter, but I'll close by saying that the Earth is a pretty amazing planet ...Let's just sit back and enjoy the ride and it's
surroundings instead of attaching alarmist agenda-driven theories to it's natural processes.
edit on 2/8/2012 by Jubilation T Cornpone because: (no reason given)