reply to post by melatonin
One sided nonsense.
The chorus of skeptical scientific voices grow louder in 2008 and 2009 as a steady stream of peer-reviewed studies, analyses, real world data and
inconvenient developments challenged the UN’s and former Vice President Al Gore's claims that the "science is settled" and there is a
"consensus." On a range of issues, 2008 and 2009 proved to be challenging for the promoters of man-made climate fears. Promoters of anthropogenic
warming fears endured the following: Global temperatures failing to warm; Peer-reviewed studies predicting a continued lack of warming; a failed
attempt to revive the discredited “Hockey Stick”; inconvenient developments and studies regarding rising CO2; the Spotless Sun; Clouds;
Antarctica; the Arctic; Greenland’s ice; Mount Kilimanjaro; Global sea ice; Causes of Hurricanes; Extreme Storms; Extinctions; Floods; Droughts;
Ocean Acidification; Polar Bears; Extreme weather deaths; Frogs; lack of atmospheric dust; Malaria; the failure of oceans to warm and rise as
In addition, the following developments further secured 2008 and 2009 as the years the “consensus” collapsed. Russian scientists “rejected the
very idea that carbon dioxide may be responsible for global warming”. An American Physical Society editor conceded that a “considerable
presence” of scientific skeptics exists. An International team of scientists countered the UN IPCC, declaring: “Nature, Not Human Activity, Rules
the Climate”. India Issued a report challenging global warming fears. International Scientists demanded the UN IPCC “be called to account and
cease its deceptive practices,” and a canvass of more than 51,000 Canadian scientists revealed 68% disagree that global warming science is
“settled.” A Japan Geoscience Union symposium survey in 2008 “showed 90 per cent of the participants do not believe the IPCC report.”
This new report issued by the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee's office of the GOP Ranking Member is the latest evidence of the growing
groundswell of scientific opposition challenging significant aspects of the claims of the UN IPCC and Al Gore. Scientific meetings are now being
dominated by a growing number of skeptical scientists. The prestigious International Geological Congress, dubbed the geologists' equivalent of the
Olympic Games, was held in Norway in August 2008 and prominently featured the voices of scientists skeptical of man-made global warming fears. [See:
Skeptical scientists overwhelm conference: '2/3 of presenters and question-askers were hostile to, even dismissive of, the UN IPCC'
AGW = no agenda huh?
Why is the United States State Department
playing a role in this effort of participating and policing the Copenhagen Accord when the science
that is at the core of Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW)/Climate Change has been exposed as being based on fraud?
Of course readers here are familiar with the arguments (and the fact that the Met office admitted to serious problems with its temperature data
used as a base for previous projections) and the fact that skeptics seem to be winning the day.
Observations poke finger of reality In the eye of global warming protectionistsThis week, the United Nations
concludes a two-week meeting in
Bonn, Germany on environmental climate and Global Warming issues looking for a binding agreement on greenhouse gases.Progress toward reaching a
comprehensive global climate deal among industrial nations ... read this as a Cap & Trade money gathering scheme ... has been elusive to craft ever
since information was revealed that statistical information upon which climate projections were based was tainted and fraudulently crafted by
Fraudulent 'Nature Geoscience' study paper on Sea Levels is pulled On what the authors cite as having a lack of confidence in the data they used to
reach the conclusion that sea levels would rise by as much as 2.7 feet by the end of the twenty-first century, authors Mark Siddall, Thomas Stocker
and Peter Clark
pull a study paper published in the journal, Nature Geoscience.All of this effort to correct the factual record is additional
evidence that the Scientific Method was never a consideration as it relates to the agenda that changes in the Earth's climate are directly related to
Obama Administration diverts CIA resources
to AGW ScientistsActing CIA Director, Leon Panetta, has directed the CIA to share data collection
assets, time, and classified information with about 60 select scientists. The National Reconnaissance Office, which operates the nation’s fleet of
spy satellites, is providing much of the data.Former Vice President Al Gore is credited with helping restart the collaboration by urging Senator
Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), a member of the Senate Intelligence Committee, to convince the CIA and others it was time to bring Medea (Measurements of
Climategate data shaping "Modus Operandi" seen in more organizations The rogue tactics of once respected climate scientists have now been uncovered
in another British institution. Data from Russian weather stations from the mid-1930's on was "cherry-picked" and only about 25% of the data was
used to substantiate a theory of AGW (human-activity triggered global warming) in order to qualify for more grants and recognition from the UN effort
for climate studies ... the IPCC.On Tuesday, the Moscow-based Institute of Economic Analysis (IEA) issued a report claiming that the...
Anthropogenic Global Warming Scientists, the new “Flat Earth” society? (Video Link Added) Last week, a hacker revealed that a group of powerful,
European scientists are controlling the results of developing global warming theory, and preventing clear debate
the development of opposing scientific evidence to AGW (Anthropogenic Global Warming). It appears that certain more objective scientists run the
risk --- if they present solid evidence contrary to the popular global warming theories
--- realize they run the risk of being made objects of
ridicule and marginalized in efforts to gain monies from Governments for research projects designed to discover facts ... that lead to the truth.
Still think there's no agenda? Course you do you're in on it.
Although, unlike you some have changed their mind!
I randomly picked scientists who had their names listed in the IPCC report located at:
I was able to locate approximately 1/3 who now have publicly stated or published articles that they do not believe in Man Made Global Warming or have
signed the following petition.
I wonder how many scientists listed in the IPCC report would add their names to the petition if they were simply mailed the petition?
Enjoy this image, it's you talking to me.