It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by xiphias
The Lewinsky affair, on the other hand, was a personal decision, and I honestly feel a man shouldn't be chastised for expressing his sexuality. Even if he did abuse his power to get his rocks off, almost every man on the planet would do the same thing. He lied because he had to, as I'm sure most men would.
Originally posted by JR MacBeth
Focusing on Obama being gay is yet another distraction. Bush and Clinton were just as "gay". In the occult "religion" that all those elected to high office must adhere to these days, homosexual acts have played an increasingly important part, ever since it's "power" was (re) discovered by Aleister Crowley (almost a century ago), and woven into the highest orders of occult practice.
Originally posted by sp00n1
reply to post by Curiousisall
no, its the people that refuse to see all of the evidence and continue to proclaim this lack of evidence in some sort of sycophanatical delusion.
oh, and they also seem to be here all day every day and able to respond in an instant
Originally posted by sp00n1
Rumors abound of a sordid affair sure to rock the political world. "A scandal sure to dwarf the Watergate incident" according to some sources. In what can only be described as a bizzare and twisted tale of intrigue, hushed whispers can be heard brewing in all of Washington's political circles.
As insiders begin to lose hope in Obama, many are speaking out about his outrageous behavior;
White House Insider: "They were in shock at the president’s behavior."
So who do you place the most blame for the Democratic Party’s troubles today?
President Obama and his administration -without a doubt. The Obama White House has been a political train wreck from day one, and it isn’t getting any better at the moment. You already know my feelings on that.
White House Insider: Coming Soon – Serious White House Scandal
Sorry for having to cancel our face to face. I accepted advisory position with the -name withheld- campaign. Got a ton of work to do as time is short but nice to be “back in it.” Getting timely information from sources in WH increasingly difficult. Have not seen a situation where things were so tight as this current WH. Staff fear levels very high. Abnormally so. I caution you on your own attempts. Be very careful. Something beyond just the election cycle and loss of House going on now. Received reliable word that a “serious” scandal is being navigated by WH officials right now. At present unable to get clarification. Source is scared. I am not comfortable pushing so hard as to possibly endanger them. Attempting follow up on information with another source. Will contact you with that information when it becomes available. This sounds very serious though, and WH is cracking down on containment hard. Very hard. NYT is said to know something. Keep eyes n ears open as it appears, based on what I have so far, this will start to break open sooner than later. Developing.
According to inside sources, scandal is brewing and Democrats seek to distance themselves, after the Dem's lose the house they can no longer contain the scandal or prevent the investigations...
White House Insider: "President Obama is lost. Absolutely lost."
Sadly, with this White House it is no longer a matter of a scandal, but of scandals. I see you did a story recently on the Justice Department situation surrounding the voting rights case. Continue watching that – it’s going to break open more soon after Republicans take the House. As you stated, it’s going to be investigated.
Ok… I have to be very-very careful here. You need to understand that. I cannot say too much or my position is clearly exposed – or it could be. So I’m hesitant to say too much or the wrong thing. You’re stepping on some very large feet now with this stuff. I don’t know if you fully appreciate that, or the dangers that come with it.
White House scrambling to cover up scandal? Related to Chicago and Rezko and Blagojevich? Does someone have dirt on obama that they are using for political blackmail?
Some allege special treatment for Rezko, Obama's old real estate partner. They even bought a house together that was later involved in a big obama scandal.
After Rezko was convicted of fraud, he seems to have completely disappeared.
Where in the world is Tony Rezko?
Why is Antoin “Tony” Rezko under lock and key at an undisclosed location, like some sort of CIA-renditioned al Qaeda operative? And why hasn’t he been sentenced yet?
The Chicago Sun-Times reported that Rezko was moved from Chicago’s downtown Metropolitan Correctional Center on December 16th, even though it’s right across the street from the federal courthouse where Blago will be tried. Rezko’s not listed on the federal Bureau of Prisons’ inmate locator, either.
“Nobody knows where he is,” a source in Chicago told The Examiner. The other big question: Why hasn’t Rezko been sentenced yet? It’s been almost two years since the Chicago restaurant and real estate developer was convicted on bribery, fraud and money laundering charges.
In another fishy development, not all of the evidence collected on Blagojevich could be entered at trial.
Last month, Blagojevich’s trial judge, U.S. District Court judge James Zagel, a crony of former Illinois Republican Governor Jim Thompson, ruled that all 500 hours of phone calls intercepted and taped by Fitzgerald could not be played during Blagojevich’s trial as demanded by Blagojevich and his defense lawyers. Blagojevich demanded that Fitzgerald “show up in court and explain to everybody . . . why you don’t want those tapes that you made played in court.”
WMR has learned that the tapes may contain salty references Obama’s and Emanuel’s private lives.
In an even more disturbing development, details of Mr. Obama's private life may be leaving him wide open to political blackmail. Could this be why Rezko hasn't been sentenced yet? Or why Blagojevich got away with his crimes? Or perhaps even why Obama pressured the Justice Department into quashing the Black Panther's voter intimidation investigations... you know the one where large angry men were standing outside voting areas with lead pipes telling white people not to vote?
President Obama and his chief of staff Rahm Emanuel are lifetime members of the same gay bath house in uptown Chicago, according to informed sources in Chicago’s gay community, as well as veteran political sources in the city.
Obama began frequenting Man’s Country in the mid-1990s, during the time he transitioned from a lecturer at the University of Chicago Law School to his election as an Illinois State Senator in 1996. Emanuel, reportedly joined Man’s Country after he left the Clinton White House and moved back to Chicago in 1998, joining the investment firm of Wasserstein Perella and maintaining his membership during his 2002 campaign for the U.S. 5th District House seat vacated by Rod Blagojevich, who was elected governor.
The Chicago gay community is aware that Obama often made contacts with younger men at his famous “pick-up basketball” games. It was at these “pick up” matches where Obama first met Emanuel.
I know, it sounds incredible.... but then I never would have believed that George Bush would hire a male prostitute to pretend to be a white house correspondent. Or that Senator Larry Craig would try to solicit sex in an airport bathroom. Or that Sen. Mark Foley, in charge of Congressional efforts to stop online predators, would himself be a sexual predator to underaged male staffers.
Then there's the washington post article about Bill Frist sending out homo-erotic cards where invitees had to 'unbuckle a scantily clad cowboy's belt buckle to open the card'. The back of the card apparently contained a 'hanky code' in reference to some really weird sexual activities....
While there is nothing wrong or immoral about being gay, the extent to which people will do illegal things to cover it up is wrong.
Man’s Country, one of Chicago’s “grand old bathhouses” and located at 5015 North Clark Street in Chicago’s “Boystown,” was a frequent hangout for State Senator Obama and Rahm Emanuel.
Sources in Chicago’s gay community report that Obama was attracted to Man’s Country’s older white clientele because he generally enjoys being fellated by older white men. Obama would regularly be seen at Man’s Country on Wednesdays.
The sources also confirm the allegations made during the 2008 campaign by Larry Sinclair, a Chicago visitor who revealed that in 1999 he engaged in such oral sex activity and crack coc aine use with then-State senator Obama on two occasions, once in the back of a Chicago limousine operated by Five Star Limousine Service, and the other at a Chicago area motel, the Comfort Suites in Gurnee, Illinois.
It would appear that a great many people are aware of these allegations and would seek to use these t further their own interests. It does seem unlikely that Barack Obama would not have been elected if he ran as an openly bi-sexual individual.
MOD NOTE: Posting work written by others
DMCA: Digital Millennium Copyright Actedit on Sun Oct 31 2010 by DontTreadOnMe because: IMPORTANT: Using Content From Other Websites on ATS
Originally posted by ImaginaryReality1984
Sorry can i just step in and ask a question.
If the guy is gay then how exactly does this stop him being an effective leader? Not that i'm a big Obama fan, i just don't see the issue here.
Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by projectvxn
Uh oh.....probably unintentional, but funny....
Call a spade a spade
"Oh No He Didn't!!!"
But, for the OP? If anyone thinks that being Gay is going to have any "blackmail" authority over someone, they are truly misinformed. This isn't 1950!!!
edit on 31 October 2010 by weedwhacker because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Curiousisall
reply to post by jazkaat
You know what else it sounds like?
Pure Obama hating, unsubstantiated, soap opera quality, rumor mill BS.
Sounds a whole lot like that to me.
I guess I never imagined that ATS would be openly debating the deeper psychological ramifications of the truth behind the claims that have yet to be any more than something someone wrote on a blog.