Just to confirm: Anak Krakatau has
not "just erupted". It's been having eruptions for years and the only matter of note is that its latest
series of eruptions are more frequent than in some previous years.
A couple of details from John Seach, a volcanologist (Note: "Seach", not "Search" as it's frequently but wrongly spelled.):
Here is some data from Mr Seach on eruptions of Krakatau/Anak Krakatau since the "big one" in 1883:
Krakatau Volcano Eruptions
2007-10, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1997, 1996, 1994-95, 1992-93, 1988, 1981, 1980, 1979, 1978, 1975, 1972-73, 1969?, 1965?, 1959-63, 1958-59, 1955, 1953,
1952, 1950, 1949, 1946-47, 1946, 1945, 1944, 1943, 1942, 1941, 1938-40, 1937, 1936, 1935, 1932-34, 1931-32, 1927-30, 1883
Here's a short statement from Mr Seach about this volcano:
Krakatau (Krakatoa) Volcano lies in Sunda Strait between Sumatra and Java Islands. It belongs to Lampung Province. Krakatau Volcanic Complex
consists of Rakata, Sertung, Panjang and Anak Krakatau Islands. Anak Krakatau is the currently active centre at the volcano and emerged from the sea
in 1930.
and
2010 Eruptions
On 29th October 2010 there were 136 eruptions at the volcano, compared to a recent average of 10 per day. Krakatau volcano was raised to level 2
alert.
The source page for this information is
here.
According to this highly respected scientist, there's no problem with using either Krakatau or Anak Krakatau. As he says, the volcano is Krakatau,
and Anak Krakatau is the active part within its center. So, take your pick -- but don't be too picky over the name. We all know which volcano we're
talking about.
Also, if you check the
Smithsonian/USGS weekly volcanic activity report for last week, Krakatau
doesn't even rate a mention. Yes, it was active and erupting last week, but not at a rate that concerned officials enough to advise USGS.
Obviously -- as Krakatau wasn't listed -- not all active volcanoes make that list. Just the ones that are of significant interest and/or concern to
scientists. We can expect that Krakatau will make the list this week.
So, while it's true that Indonesian authorities are keeping a watch on (Anak) Krakatau, they've been doing so for years. It's
not true that
this volcano just started erupting; their concern and raised alert level is based on the fact that its number of eruptions has increased well beyond
the average, and so it could be a problem if things continue to worsen there. It has had significant increases in activity before, several times,
without any catastrophic eruption resulting from it (since 1883, I mean).
But right now, the authorities are probably more concerned about Merapi, because its current eruptions are different in character from most of those
in the past century or so (which were "quieter") and more like those in centuries prior, so they fear it might have a major, "explosive" eruption
with significant ejecta.
The mass media are often poor sources for good information about volcanic activity and seismic events. (Yeah, okay, and about a lot of other stuff,
too.

) In cases like this, they rarely give much historical detail beyond the spectacular or most disastrous, and this can lead people to assume
that every time a volcano like Krakatau erupts, it's going to be a major catastrophe. Sure, it sells newspapers and advertising space, but does
little to inform the public of the real situation.
I'm not saying that things are not serious in Indonesia. Far from it: right now, the situation is pretty worrying, with eight volcanoes being raised
to alert level II status in recent days. But Krakatau is nowhere near as big a concern as Merapi. For now, anyway.
Best regards,
Mike