It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
After David Carradine's divorce papers in 2003 with his fourth wife revealed his "potentially deadly" sexual behavior, another woman speaks up about his deviant sex habit. In an interview with Patricia Towle this weekend, the actor's third wife, Gail Jensen, informed that David would spend days dealing with his sexual devices.
Gail told Patricia that David had a habit of doing sex with rope. "David was pretty strange," she said, before adding "He would like to get tied up. He would tie himself up and I would walk in and see him and say 'Oh my God, David, you got to be kidding me' -- and I would (turn around and) walk out. I would leave him to his own devices."
It was written on the papers that the reason for their divorce was "the continuation of abhorrent and deviant sexual behavior which was potentially deadly." It was also explained on the papers, "His deviate behavior includes an incestuous relationship with a very close family member, which permeated our marriage. This is to his admission and the admission of the person involved."
Originally posted by Holly N.R.A.
Lets get this back on topic...discussing other Hollywood Hits could have merit if others are being harassed as Evi and Randy Quaid have claimed. It in some way should give credit to what is happening to them, agreed?
The mention of Scientology and Hollywood is also another real possibility. Many of the ones that have passed either were involved or checked out the Scientology crew. This too makes you wonder.
One more thing, others that died under "odd" circumstances such as Jim Morrison, Janis Joplin, (both very outspoken against the US Government policy of the times) and of course Kurt Cobain and Layne Staley (two more who were strongly opinionated) appeared to be nothing more than alcoholic/druggies, but still there were too many questions left unanswered. Those that remember, should think about it.
~holly
The only "former" celeb Scientologist who "passed" semi-recently was Patrick Swayze. (Of course, someone is bound to claim that cancer is a government plot...) Isaac Hayes & Sonny Bono were both still active members when they died. I'm not aware of any other particularly significant celeb Scientology deaths.
Originally posted by MiMobs
Please provide sources for this...When you say many.. Please clarify which ones that have passed have "checked out" Scientology.
Originally posted by MiMobs
reply to post by Aeons
Yes , but you claimed that he was taking anti dementia medication.. I have searched this.. There is NOT ONE source that even references this.. Why would a person make this up? Please inform as to why you would make up a lie to .... heck, I dont know why you would do that..
Again.. please provide a source..or your statement just became a lie.
www.threatassessment.vt.edu...
rems.ed.gov...
The threat assessment team works in a four part process.
1. Identify persons of concern
2. Gather information/investigate
3. Assess information and situation
4. Manage the situation
Gather Information (Full Inquiry)
• Think broadly and creatively about those who
might have information:
• Co-workers
• Other staff
• Friends
• Family
• Online friends, web sites, etc.
• Previous schools / employers
• Others?
• Document information and use it to answer the
Key Investigative Questions.
Initial Screening
Helpful Internet sites include:
Google.com Bebo.com
MySpace.com Xanga.com
Facebook.com Snopes.com
YouTube.com thehoodup.com
Technorati.com
(searches blogs)
craigslist.com
(search the relevant city/town)
Twitter.com JuicyCampus.com
Blackplanet.com RateMyProfessor.com
MiGente.com Cuil.com
2. Have there been any communications
suggesting ideas or intent to attack?
• What, if anything, has the person
communicated to someone else (targets,
friends, co-workers, others) or written in a
diary, journal, email, or Web site concerning
his or her grievances, ideas and/or intentions?
• Has anyone been alerted or “warned away”?
Source: U.S. Secret Service and U.S. Department of Education, (2002)
Guide to Managing Threatening Situations and Creating Safe School Climates.
Key Investigative Questions
Information Sharing: HIPAA
• Check with legal counsel as to which laws
govern counseling center records.
• Confidentiality is held by client, not MH provider.
• In cases where privacy laws apply, can try these
strategies:
• No legal prohibition against providing
information to health/MH professionals.
• Inquire about Tarasoff – type duty.
• Ask subject for permission to disclose.
Record Keeping
• Centralized incident tracking database;
• Document reports and actions – include date,
time, subjects, targets, behaviors of concern,
witnesses;
• Data;
• Assessment;
• Plan;
• Preserve evidence: Keep copies of email,
memos, etc.
Record Keeping
Incident tracking database;
• Incident Information:
• Date, location, nature of incident, means of approach;
• Subject information:
• Name, DOB, sex, description, affiliation, status, etc.
• Target / Victim Information;
• Name, DOB, sex, description, affiliation, status, etc.
• Witness/Reporting Party Information:
• Name, DOB, sex, description, affiliation, status, etc.
Assessing Information and Situation
Once all the reports are in from the eyes and ears around the target, then the assessing of information begins.
Think creatively about resources, as well as
“eyes and ears.”
• Anticipate likely change in the short and midterm,
and how the subject may react.
• Monitor using available resources. Who sees
the person regularly, inside work/campus,
outside, on weekends, online, etc.?
While the case is open the team should:
• Continue to monitor and modify the plan as long as the individual still poses a threat
• Recognize that a person can continue to pose a threat even after he/she ceases to be a Closing a Case
member of the campus community
• Continue to monitor the situation through its relationship with local law enforcement agencies and mental health agencies, as well as in direct cooperation with the person, if possible
If someone who has been reviewed by the Threat Assessment Team leaves the area, do you continue to monitor him/her?
If the situation warrants reviewing the case after the subject leaves the area, the team will continue to do so. It is important to remember that when the subject has relationships in his/her life, there is a lesser chance for violence to occur. A failure to communicate or interact with a subject encourages problems to fester, which could lead to violence.
www.wcb.pe.ca...
“In the service sector this may require identifying to employees persons who have a history of aggressive or inappropriate behavior in the store, bar, mall or taxi.
The identity of the person and the nature of the risk must be given to staff likely to come into contact with that person. While workers have the right to know the risks, it is important to remember that this information cannot be indiscriminately distributed.
Assessment: Case Priority Levels
PRIORITY 1 (Extreme Risk): Poses clear/immediate threat of violence or self-harm and requires immediate containment, law enforcement involvement, target protection, and case management plan.
PRIORITY 2 (High Risk): Poses threat of violence or self-harm but lacks immediacy or access to target. Requires active monitoring and case management plan.
PRIORITY 3 (Moderate Risk): Does not pose threat of violence or self harm, but exhibits significantly disruptive behaviors and/or need for assistance. Requires active monitoring, case management plan, and appropriate referrals.
PRIORITY 4 (Low Risk): Does not pose threat of violence or self-harm at this time, but may exhibit some disruptive behavior and/or need for assistance. Requires passive monitoring. Utilize case management and referrals as appropriate.
PRIORITY 5 (No Identified Risk): Does not pose threat of violence or self-harm nor is there evidence of disruption to community. No case management or monitoring required.
These involve me and the estate of my late husband. Just look at this... my signature was forged! Someone moved money in my daughter's name to Geneva and Zurich without me even knowing it! They've stolen over $28 million from me... people think I'm nuts, but I don't give a ****! I'm going to see this through to the end!"