posted on Oct, 29 2010 @ 09:16 PM
Only two things the incident on the video proved: everybody is a tough guy until it comes right down to it...and violence rarely solves anything.
So, Who Won?
How would the assaulted (and yes 100% he was assaulted) camera person feel if someone stuck a camera into their face after interrupting one of their
sponsored events. I am not defending the actions of the aggressor but no matter what, in incidents as such, it always takes at least two. Please
don't forget the WeAreChange guys instigated the negativity.
How does filing assault charges help WeAreChange's message and their 9/11 beliefs?
They admitted that they were going to confront John Stewart because he makes FUN(i.e. JS attempt at being funny) of the whole 9/11 movement and
the WeAreChange member's beliefs.
John Stewart makes fun of everybody and everything. That is his job. He is a comedian, PERIOD!
Running around yelling "9/11 Was An Inside Job" at public events is not productive and takes away from the forward progress of unveiling what really
happened.
WeAreChange and other groups like them have done a lot to draw attention to the discrepancies of 9/11. I am interested in exactly what their game plan
was and wonder if they even had one for this event to further their cause.
Sorry About His Broken Camera And His Broken Face but mostly I hope he is sorry because he acted like he was running/crying to his mommy at the end of
the video after losing the My Dad Can Beat Up Your Dad Game!
Thanks For The Laugh Anyways,
t
Before you jump to a conclusion with your hate replies that I take JS side, for the record: I am not satisfied with the 9/11 OS or any story yet...I
would much more appreciate further intelligent fact based data to make any conclusion as IMO nobody, to date, has the definitive answer.
Regards,
t