It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Target Earth
reply to post by MrXYZ
it may be true, that it started under Bush's watch, but it was mainly Democratic policy that really got us into this mess... I live in Illinois we are bankrupt, because of the liberal criminal Democrats who have spent this state into a black hole. Illinois has turned into a welfare state... The Democrats are the one's who have lead us off the cliff, my friend
Originally posted by Target Earth
So Obama is now on the Daily Show, does this not seem a tad bit non-presidential to anyone else?
Originally posted by PayMeh
If he says one more thing about filibusters and needing 60 votes and them not being in the constitution and wanting to change that process because they're not doing what he wants them to, I'm going to go ballistic!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
He mentioned it twice during the interview. As if that were the problem. So Mr. President. If you don't want 60 votes to get something done, how many do you want? 1? 2? How about none and we just take your word that you don't have an agenda and that all you care about is the American People. Yeah right. I've seen better salesmanship in a used car lot.
There's a difference in saying "I have an idea that I want to see if we can all agree on" and going in and saying "you're not going to like this, but I do so it's going to happen".... It's called TYRANNY.edit on 27-10-2010 by PayMeh because: to add...
Well, the fact remains, all major economic indicator say it got better since he took over. If it's not better than it was under Bush, it's clearly not possible that the "Dems" got us into this mess. I hope you see why it's impossible given the timeline of events and corresponding economic indicators.
Well, the fact remains, all major economic indicator say it got better since he took over. If it's not better than it was under Bush, it's clearly not possible that the "Dems" got us into this mess. I hope you see why it's impossible given the timeline of events and corresponding economic indicators.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
Originally posted by Target Earth
So Obama is now on the Daily Show, does this not seem a tad bit non-presidential to anyone else?
Oh, it's just so unseemly! So... common! How dare he mingle with the lower life forms!
First, his critics are saying he's "elite" and then they're complaining because he's non-presidential!
Make up your mind!
I thought his appearance on TDS was fantastic! What's wrong with a president appearing on a TV show? He's done a lot of "firsts". Why not this?