It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Dream recording device 'possible' researcher claims

page: 1
5

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 27 2010 @ 01:00 PM
link   
This is a really cool idea, and hopefully it can be done. I've always wondered if we could capture our dreams, and also wondered why it was so hard to remember them. Isn't technology amazing?



A US researcher says he plans to electronically record and interpret dreams.

Writing in the journal Nature, scientists say they have developed a system capable of recording higher level brain activity.

"We would like to read people's dreams," says the lead scientist Dr Moran Cerf.

The aim is not to interlope, but to extend our understanding of how and why people dream.

For centuries, people have been fascinated by dreams and what they might mean. In Ancient Egypt they were thought to be messages from God.

More recently, dream analysis has been used by psychologists as a tool to understand the unconscious mind. But the only way to interpret dreams is to ask people about the subject of their dreams after they had woken up.

The eventual aim of Dr Cerf's project is to develop a system which would enable psychologists to corroborate people's recollections of their dream with an electronic visualisation of their brain activity.

Continue reading the main story


UCLA
"There's no clear answer as to why humans dream," according to Dr Cerf. "And one of the questions we would like to answer is when do we actually create this dream?"

Dr Cerf makes his bold claim based on an initial study which he says suggests that the activity of individual brain cells, or neurons, are associated with specific objects or concepts.

He found, for example, that when a volunteer was thinking of Marilyn Monroe, a particular neuron lit up.

By showing volunteers a series of images, Dr Cerf and his colleagues were able to identify neurons for a wide range of objects and concepts - which they used to build up a database for each patient. These included Bill and Hilary Clinton, the Eiffel Tower and celebrities.

So by observing which brain cell lit up and when, Dr Cerf says he was effectively able to "read the subjects' minds".

Dream catcher

He admits that there is a very long way to go before this simple observation can be translated into a device to record dreams, or dream catcher. But he thinks it is a possibility - and he said he would like to try.

The next stage is to monitor the brain activity of the volunteers when they are sleeping.

The researchers will only be able to identify images or concepts that correlate with those stored on their database. But this data base could in theory be built up - by for example monitoring neuronal activity while the volunteer is watching a film.

But Dr Roderick Oner, a clinical psychologist and dream expert, believes that while this kind of limited visualisation might be of academic interest - it will not really help in the interpretation of dreams or be of use in therapy.

"For that you need the entire complex dream narrative," he said.

Another difficulty with the technique is that to get the kind of resolution needed to monitor individual neurons, subjects had to have electrodes surgically implanted deep inside their brain.

In the Nature study, the researchers obtained their results by studying patients who had electrodes implanted to monitor and treat them for brain seizures.

Translating thoughts

But Dr Cerf believes that sensor technology is developing at such a pace that eventually it might be possible to monitor brain activity in this way without invasive surgery. If this were to happen it would open up a range of possibilities.

"It would be wonderful to read people's minds where they cannot communicate, such as people in comas," said Dr Cerf.

There have been attempts to create machine interfaces before that aim to translate thoughts into instructions to control computers or machines.

But in the main these have tried to tap into areas of the brain involved in controlling movement. Dr Cerf's system monitors higher level areas of the brain and can potentially identify abstract concepts.

"We can sail with our imaginations and think about all the things we could do if we had access to a person's brain and basically visualise their thoughts.

"For example, instead of just having to write an email you could just think it. Or another futuristic application would be to think a flow of information and have it written in front of your eyes."

Professor Colin Blakemore, a neuroscientist at Oxford University, believes that it is quite a jump from the limited results obtained in the study to talking about recording dreams.


www.bbc.co.uk...



posted on Oct, 27 2010 @ 01:05 PM
link   
reply to post by monkeySEEmonkeyDO
 


Imagine the youtube vids of peoples dreams. Be prepared to laugh your ass off and be very creeped out at the same time. Dreams can get really weird! and watching them in a lucid state will be quite an experience.
I would love to watch my dreams! although, the technology does sound like it could lead to more negative things like mind reading etc.
edit on 27-10-2010 by _Phoenix_ because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 27 2010 @ 01:22 PM
link   

Originally posted by _Phoenix_
reply to post by monkeySEEmonkeyDO
 


Imagine the youtube vids of peoples dreams. Be prepared to laugh your ass off and be very creeped out at the same time. Dreams can get really weird! and watching them in a lucid state will be quite an experience.
I would love to watch my dreams! although, the technology does sound like it could lead to more negative things like mind reading etc.
edit on 27-10-2010 by _Phoenix_ because: (no reason given)


LOL very true! I have a feeling that if we could record our dreams, that alot of us would hit the "delete" button after watching it, haha. Dreams are so random but can be very revealing.



posted on Oct, 27 2010 @ 02:43 PM
link   
No other takers?



posted on Oct, 28 2010 @ 09:15 AM
link   
This thread deserves some attention. I can forsee only almost entirely negative repercussions in regard to this technology. It makes me wonder what the more advanced and better funded black projects are capable of.

The only consolation for me is that from what I can understand this tech would only provide a generic approximation of a dream. You could map a chair and Marilyn Monroe and make an assumption that MM is sitting on it. However, You wouldnt be able to 'see' what the chair was like. You wouldn't be able to describe what Marilyn Monroe was wearing, how she had her hair, what location or room she was in, what the pattern on carpet was like? Or what she had just said.

The devil is in the detail and hopefully the detail will be significantly more difficult to capture.



posted on Oct, 28 2010 @ 09:23 AM
link   
While the technology def sounds like if produced and refined could lead to some negative uses (like any other emerging technology) it would be awesome if I could record some of my lucid dreams. They remind me of a psychedelic trip most of the time and the vividness is unreal, could make for an awesome movie. This of course leads me to think of the positive uses, an experienced lucid dreamer could technically write a script while awake and record one hell of an awesome show while dreaming, could turn into its own art form.



new topics

top topics
 
5

log in

join