Our Moon is an Artificial Space Station ~~~ PROOF!!!, page 5


Pages: <<  2    3    4    5    6    7    8  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 133 times


reply posted on 27-10-2010 @ 10:32 AM by PsychNurse
Originally posted by MAC269
reply to
post by sp00n1



Dear sp00n1

I really hate to say this but there are people out there that would say, is GOD not wonderful providing us with this unusual object that we call the Moon which makes life possible here on the Earth he created. Most likely 6,000 odd years ago.

Then again people will also say what a wonderful co-incidence.

Sorry as much as I would like it to be there is no proof of anything but good luck there.


I know religion is strong deterrent in the belief of science... but seriously with all of the evidence out there you still feel...Most likely 6,000 odd years ago. I just can't buy into that at all... Must be an atheist I guess.


reply posted on 27-10-2010 @ 10:43 AM by rickyrrr
reply to post by sp00n1



Mascons are not evidence of the moon been artificial. If anything they can be considered evidence of the randomness of the process that produced the moon.

Mascons are believed to be caused by dense rock formations and the variations in gravity are not big, but slight.

Additionally, Mascons are not unique to the moon, but happen on earth and many other solid bodies. The moon's average gravity is small enough in the first place that the variations in gravity are more noticeable.

-rrr


reply posted on 27-10-2010 @ 10:56 AM by mark1167
Originally posted by sp00n1
What If We Had No Moon?!




Man, I wish Patrick Stewart would do the voice overs for every documentary ever made! Make it so!

Very interesting little clip.The moon is a strange anomoly and it has fascinated man since the beginning of time.
I can't wait for the day a private firm independant of any government agency, goes to the moon and finds out
the truth about it.With the recent missions by Japan and India and all the so called high resolution photos that were supposed to give us more answers than NASA ever did,I am still left disappointed and puzzled by the lack of independant verification about the moons anomolies.
Have either of those two countries missions focused at all on the lunar landing sight? I didn't think so.
Does anyone have a library of photos from India or Japans missions? I saw a few of the japanese photos,and needless to say I was not impressed.Maybe I missed something.Why has no one ever pointed a massive telescope at the moon and studied it.Surely if we can detect planets circling suns in distant galaxies, we could find out once and for all if man really did land on the moon, or if it was a artificial sattelite, or if there were alien structures there or any of the other questions we all have.Peace.



reply posted on 27-10-2010 @ 10:59 AM by rickyrrr
Originally posted by Korg Trinity
And still no answer as to why the planets are not Tidally locked to the sun, yet the moons are???

Just askin lol ;p

Korg.


Actually, mercury is tidally locked to the sun, but in 3/2 resonance (rotates 3 times for each 2 orbits around the sun).

en.wikipedia.org...(planet)

I don't fully understand the mechanics of this, but it is explained on the above link as the result of an eccentric orbit, where the locking effect is strongest where the orbit places the planet closest to the sun.

-rrr



reply posted on 27-10-2010 @ 11:02 AM by catlantis
Hiya,
here is a question and answer from cornell on this topic. (its answers have already been presented above, though).

curious.astro.cornell.edu...

I find it interesting that Saturn's Hyperion is not locked like the rest.

Also, Mercury keeps one side constant to the sun. I believe that planet has been called the hottest and coolest planet in the solar system because of this.


reply posted on 27-10-2010 @ 11:11 AM by ReLaMiSiDoFaSol
reply to post by WashingtonGrewHemp



Nothing is artificial, it all fits into the building blocks of the universe, the biochemical equation of life so to speak, call it fi or pi or whatever. We can recreate most things natural to the earth under microscope even with our incomplete knowledge. I like the post above that talked about who created mathematics... now that is interesting... there is still a possibility that the entire universe is artificial, a conatruct of intellegent design so to speak. Stephen Hawkings in his latest book goes talking about the mastery of the three dimension and how rational mastery of the human mind could take us to that stage albeit some genetic issues concering our mental capabilities. I think it would be cool if we become smart enough to design our own universe, but I guess we have to learn AutoCAD first hey, and then we could be timelords! haha Check out the Kardashev Scale, it was a cross intellectual figitization between good ole Carl Sagan and some Russian astronomer... interesting stuff.


reply posted on 27-10-2010 @ 11:14 AM by blah yada
How big would this space station have been before the 4.5 billion years of accumulation?

What would it be constructed from?

How would a hollow body with low mass, in planetary terms,survive the impacts of other bodies as it clearly has?

Is the moon exactly 1/400th the size of the sun, given that the moon accumulates matter continuously while the sun destroys it's matter?

Is it's proximity to Earth a constant?You give it in a 400:1 ratio.How precise is that figure and how could that ratio never change given the constant dynamic masses and forces in operation around it?Like the suns gravitational pull for instance.I'd agree that a lot of such forces operate against one another and cancel one another out to a degree.But I believe the moon is getting further from us very gradually, and that once it was a lot closer.

The coincidences you pointed out are really only coincidence due to rounding down figures and comparing size measurements with distance measurement because of an equal numeric denomination ie 400.

The notion that visually, the moon is the same size as the sun to us at eclipse (total ones), is again a conclusion reached by assessing an event taking place over billions of cubic miles with the human eye (or man made devices whose ultimate calibration is by and for the human eye.)

If we increased the distance between the Earth and moon by say......1000 miles do you think you could tell the difference.

Basically what I am saying is there are no exact matches and fixed ratios in the figures at play here.By great coincidence they are close and take a long time to diverge/converge and so in our context they seem to be fixed.
The closest anything can achieve to true constance is through suspended animation.Otherwise the big wheel keeps on turning and everything keeps changing.


reply posted on 27-10-2010 @ 11:25 AM by DJW001
reply to post by catlantis



Mercury rotates in a 3:2 harmonic with its orbital period.
For many years it was thought that Mercury was synchronously tidally locked with the Sun, rotating once for each orbit and always keeping the same face directed towards the Sun, in the same way that the same side of the Moon always faces the Earth. However, radar observations in 1965 proved that the planet has a 3:2 spin–orbit resonance, rotating three times for every two revolutions around the Sun; the eccentricity of Mercury’s orbit makes this resonance stable—at perihelion, when the solar tide is strongest, the Sun is nearly still in Mercury’s sky.

en.wikipedia.org...(planet)

Nevertheless, you are correct, it is the result of tidal forces. Pluto and Charon are both tidally locked to each other.


reply posted on 27-10-2010 @ 11:26 AM by Xterrain
reply to post by Phage



Please read:
www.keelynet.com...

"There were other anomalies discovered by the space missions that I didn't mention . The astronauts found it extremely difficult to drill into the surface of the moon below the loose dust layer . *When the discarded descent stages of the spacecrafts crashed on the moon , NASA noted that the moon "rang like a gong or bell " for up to four hours after impact.*

*Yes, a NASA scientist said the acoustic characteristics were that of a hollow Titanium sphere 60 miles below the surface. In addition, the scientists saw EXACTLY the same seismic traces each time a meteorite would hit, as if it were vibrating some fixed bodies inside the moon.*

So it's important to look at evidence in terms of it's totality , or cumulative effect ,

And you have not covered a great deal of the outstanding evidence, Jim. It would take 20 pages just to LIST the anomalous features of the Moon! One I don't believe you mentioned: the Moon is placed in orbit at exactly the
distance from the Earth so that it covers the Sun during a solar eclipse.

Isaac Asimov in one of his books commented on the improbability of this
occurring by chance." - Fred Epps

*confirmed by Nasa.
Pages: <<  2    3    4    5    6    7    8  >>    ^^TOP^^



New Crop Circle Hackpen Hill Cube
  Posted 16 days ago with 92 member flags
Get ready to find yourself in a whirlwind of other worldly activity
  Posted 17 days ago with 50 member flags
Crop Circles Explained - Hidden Messages From Aliens & ET\'s ?
  Posted 13 days ago with 24 member flags
Man Made Ancient Pyramids Found on Antarctica???
  Posted 9 days ago with 23 member flags
The Flat Earth theory, With Interviews from believers
  Posted 1 days ago with 22 member flags
James Cameron the revealer & programmer?
  Posted 10 days ago with 9 member flags
Secrets Revealed 2
  Posted 16 days ago with 8 member flags
Mars: The Old Earth?
  Posted 10 days ago with 8 member flags