It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Aliens cant be at Area 51

page: 2
<< 1   >>

log in


posted on Jul, 11 2004 @ 04:34 AM
To be honest, aliens or no aliens, nobody can say what is beneath Area 51. There could be a large underground facility. Where do all those people in the Janets and white buses go anyway?

posted on Jul, 11 2004 @ 05:13 AM
If I might be so bold as to inform the rest of you...

There are indeed "Grey" Aliens at Area51 as well as Dulce. Even though the fact is that Area51's presence is "public information", that does not mean the aliens would leave that facility.

The fact of the matter is, that Area51 goes very deep underground. What happens above ground is merely a layer of an onion that goes deeper than anyone could imagine, or even gain access to without the proper clearance.

If I was the government or the aliens at Area51, I would feel snug as a bug in a rug, even though a vast majority of the population speculates that there are top secret goings-on and most likely alien entities. Why? We are soon aproaching an era of political pressure for full disclosure, and soon their presence will no longer be able to be denied by the US Government anyway.

Once again this is just my opinion. See my thread in Forum>>Aliens & UFO's>>Grey Aliens and Earth



posted on Jul, 11 2004 @ 06:03 AM
Hmmm maybe the "stich" characters have greys in them and theres a tunnel that goes further down lol. However, I'm somewhat new to all this conspiracy stff about aliens and I was just wondering if 3-5 ppl on this site or others have always been saying that the aliens are going to appear in a few months (like the end of the world ppl have).

Not that I don't think thier here or real, but that I am tierd of waiting for them or the conditions needed for thier "landing" explained with logical proof

posted on Jul, 11 2004 @ 06:05 AM

Originally posted by earthtone
To be honest, aliens or no aliens, nobody can say what is beneath Area 51. There could be a large underground facility. Where do all those people in the Janets and white buses go anyway?

Area 51 could just be a distribution point for the janet planes to other locations deper and better protected in the nellis range ie the much rumored s-4 etc.

posted on Jul, 11 2004 @ 11:33 PM
Just because information about a base becomes publized it dosent mean all its "secrets" would just disappear, you know? After all, Area 51 has not become a tourist attraction and I still think they are technically allowed to open fire on you if you enter or get near the base, but I think they would probally just take you in for questioning and so fourth - its not like your going to see some aliens in the above ground facilities anyways, maybe some new experimental aircraft but no ETs.

Dulce hasnt yet been proven to actually exsist so you cant discount the fact that there are indeed aliens there (if the base does exsist)... And besides that if the information gathered on this site is true then Dulce spands levels and levels of underground facilites, so much room to hide Americas deep, dark secrets
And I doubt Dulce would be like Area 51 - you find Dulce and no one will ever find you again (just my opinion).

posted on Jul, 12 2004 @ 12:31 AM
Why would you hide a 'secret' base in alaska, the desert, or on an isolated island? Doesn't make sense anymore. In the 40's and 50's it was the practice to do this because most people had no way to access these areas and the mindset of the people was much different than today.
If they were told by the Gov that something was secret they went along with that.

Living in Montana I can tell you it wouldn't work anymore. Every year we get many people who try to come here to hide. For whatever reason they seem to think they will not be noticed in the 'wild open country'. This never works. They stick out like sore thumbs. Everyone notices them. Everyone talks about them. Criminals who do try this last less than a week for the most part.

The only place to hide ANYTHING you want to keep secret in this day and age is smack-dab in the middle of the most populous area you can find. A place where there are so many coming and goings the few related to the facility go totally unnoticed.

Want to find a secret base? Look in NYC or Ft Worth/Dallas or any other major metropolitan area where EVERYONE KNOWS THERE CAN'T BE A SECRET BASE!

Just my opinion of course.

posted on Jul, 12 2004 @ 07:33 AM
There's certainly something to what montana is saying.

in small towns particularly, each new person is studied with a great deal of interest. I worked with a local law enforcement agency who always knew when an "out-of-town cop" was coming in. If you stopped at the convenience store to use the bathroom before checking in, the clerk would phone her aunt, who worked as a police dispatcher. Frequently, there was a pot of hot coffee waiting when you got to their HQ!

This was especially true of the FBI. Their agents (pre-911) wore dark suits and drove dark lincolns. West of about Dallas, that really starts to stand out. I would arrive at the local HQ and the dispatcher would say, "unless you're about to purchase a load of insurance, then the FBI wants to talk to you."

On the other hand . . .

People in small towns are often quite supportive of local military installations, which are often major employers in rural areas. Around Fort Hood, for example, if a team of commandos show up at a rancher's house and say "chopper crash," No one ever questions it or says anything but "close the gates behind you."

The need to fly alien craft would probably necessitate basing in a rural area, just so there would be fewer witnesses. I still favor Alaska, since there are places where no one gets in or out except by aircraft, which are simple to track. Much easier to know when no one will spot your test flight.

posted on Jul, 12 2004 @ 07:45 AM

Originally posted by dr_strangecraft
The need to fly alien craft would probably necessitate basing in a rural area, just so there would be fewer witnesses. I still favor Alaska, since there are places where no one gets in or out except by aircraft, which are simple to track. Much easier to know when no one will spot your test flight.

Thats why an Atoll in the middle of BF noware in the Pacific, we own quite a few, would be perfect. No one around, no one of note watching. Put a surface seach radar to warn of impending planes and away you go. When the supply ship arrives, you park it in the hanger and make like a weather station

posted on Jul, 14 2004 @ 05:29 PM
I agree with Devilwasp. the answer could be right in front of you all along. The goverment specialise in giving out disinformation and you guys know it.
I mean you are all seeking the truth and you all believe that the goverments are hiding stuff and giving out disinformation so i think that if people like us start believing that there is nothing at area 51 then the goverment has acheived what it set out to do. They have made area 51 out to be some kind of circus however we all know that it is probably one of the most sophisticated complexes that the american goverment has. Dont be fooled people. You are all better than that and you know it thats why we are members of this site cos we think different than the rest of the robots on this strange place called planet earth.

posted on Jul, 30 2004 @ 03:45 PM
For what it's worth I think they're hiding "Something" at the new Yucca Mountain site. During construction I witnessed convoys of trucks leave the tactical base at Pickle Meadows and drive all the way down to the construction site as well as trucks from GLAFB. What business does the DOD have at an industrial radioactive waste storage facility? I mean thinking about it it's the perfect cover. It's isolated, its geographically elevated for better view of surrounding areas, they are making it VERY well known that nasty high level nuke waste is to be stored there (thus keeping people away). The perfect place to hide anything you dont want anyone to find. I mean why else would they have made the location of the site so public. Why else would they have made such a big deal about it? They didn't make a big deal about the old site in idaho. The only reason they talked so much about it and intentionally spurred so much controversy and interest in the topic was to get major news coverage that Yucca Mountain was going to be a very nasty very dangerous very radioactive place to go anywhere near. I suppose I could go on further about what's going on at yucca mountain and why I think the "hiding in plain sight" theory is at work here but I'll save that for any individual that actually wants to hear it.

posted on Jul, 30 2004 @ 09:51 PM
Most likely the government is keeping aliens in underwater secret bases or some were really isolated like Antartica. Think about it who would suspect aliens being in at Antartica? No one. And their wouldnt be anyone to accidentaly discover a base up there because their is only like what less then 200 people up their in antartica. Well this is just a thought nothin more.

posted on Jul, 30 2004 @ 10:15 PM
In my opinion Area 51 in Nevada is just as effective as some underwater base. We may know of it existence but we have no way to gain entry. A company called space imaging has a satellite in orbit that has sent back photos of the base but area 51 knows when their base will be over flown by satellites and will simply cover things up while its overhead. It may as well be on Mars.

posted on Aug, 1 2004 @ 08:23 AM
Hey im new to the whole researching kinda things as im only 14 and british but what i have worked out as i study war , modern politics etc etc and i think dont know about you lot but i think that

1: the bermuda triangle

i think that there is some sort of base in this triangle possibly under water with the entrance floating , like deep blue sea kinda base and the people missing the boats the planes and everything else is because they are being how can i put it mmmmmmm exterminated so asz\ they do not stumble across this base in the sea and as the triangle is between three islands they can easily put sensors etc etc on these so that they no when people are entering the area.

2:the twin towers

i think that the cia set up this stunt so that the poplulation wouldnt oppose war , i mean if a middle eastern guy or any other for that matter came into your country and bombed you , you would want to go over there and kill him right and the only reason they want war is because of the oil as we all know , i mean the cia trained bin laden and gave him the money , for exapmle they tried to find him and o look they never did despite looking for him since 9 11 the reason they are never going to find him because ythey arnt looking the CIA bombed the twin towers

posted on Aug, 1 2004 @ 08:50 AM
Jinn, your theory sounds very plausible. Saying a place is radioactive is the best way to hide it. I mean common, who in their right mind is going to say that they do not believe it and go running up there to find out?
Would like to know more about your theory.

Also Antarctica, Alaska, the Islands are all good places as well. As well as in Area 51, Dulce, the City in Plain view. Well, it bring us back to the point... they could be hidden anywhere AND everywhere. If aliens are prevalent on this earth and being hidden, probably they would be spread out in smaller groups. They of course, could be spread out in different types of areas that are more habitable depending on their own planets environment.

Just some random thoughts. Also, I do not think just because Humans work at the bases that they will give away secrets. I had a very high level security clearance before, but I would never say anything that I found out from the job. Most are probably like that. It would stay a secret.. If it was leaked out, then I am sure the person that leaked it would be made to sound like a fool. Because I am sure there is not going to be Bob and Darzak (alien name.
) giving the peace sign in pictures next to the Dimensionjump XP hyperplane.

[edit on 1-8-2004 by JCMinJapan]

posted on Aug, 1 2004 @ 06:15 PM
Well the problem with placing a base in a city is theres too many kids who get curious. Then theres too many technicians doing mantinence on whatever. Thats why the secret tunnel under Berlin was found. A telephone repairman found it. I would suggest Western Pennsylavania out in the country. Barely any underground cables or anything. Plus with all the hills you would need aircraft to see everything. But why not an underwater base. That might be cool. Get in by submarine. Nobody notices it.

posted on Aug, 9 2004 @ 02:23 PM

Originally posted by ghost

Second, I have a theory about how Area 51 leaked out:

The gov announced its existence after photos of it were taken from satellites, I think it was the Russians who did this no? Nowadays there are even commercially available satellites that can take photos of structures on the ground.

top topics

<< 1   >>

log in