New Angle - White Puffs of Smoke Timed Together at Several Levels

This ranks up there with one of the most solid bits of evidence for explosives used in the towers.

Credit to my buddy Dennis for bringing this to my attention.

Video link
www.youtube.com...

At about 49 seconds of video watch for lateral ejections of smoke from multiple levels of the building
occuring at the same time. This appears to be about 10 floors between puffs

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/6aaee771dfb2.jpg[/atsimg]

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/d0fd3b90cc85.jpg[/atsimg]

Stop frame shots in order
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/770437ecab70.jpg[/atsimg]
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/8becf878159e.jpg[/atsimg]
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/0e29219f6768.jpg[/atsimg]

for me it looks more like something smokey falling down..left a smoketrail behind and the wind pulls the smoke in that direction.. .you can see it in the video

Originally posted by angrydog
for me it looks more like something smokey falling down..left a smoketrail behind and the wind pulls the smoke in that direction.. .you can see it in the video

edit on 26-10-2010 by angrydog because: add

What he/she said.

Nope.

Pause the video and look at it frame by frame.

Easily done in YouTube without video software.

These are puffs emitting from the building laterally, not a fallen stream of smoke.

I'll even post the frame by frame shots later for those who cannot pause the video for themselves.

Originally posted by turbofan
This ranks up there with one of the most solid bits of evidence for explosives used in the towers.

More solid than those lateral ejections you started a thread about that turned out to be paper?

Just asking!

Originally posted by Six Sigma

Originally posted by turbofan
This ranks up there with one of the most solid bits of evidence for explosives used in the towers.

More solid than those lateral ejections you started a thread about that turned out to be paper?

Just asking!

edit on 26-10-2010 by Six Sigma because: (no reason given)

Hahah!

reply to post by turbofan

I saw what looked to be debri falling at first,then I saw what you said and it also looked like flashes of light at the :48 mark

Smoke originates from the floors, it's not debris falling sorry. I've also made a slow motion video of
stopped frames which will be uploaded soon.

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/770437ecab70.jpg[/atsimg]
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/8becf878159e.jpg[/atsimg]
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/0e29219f6768.jpg[/atsimg]

If it is what you say it is - and I don't think it is - then why doesn't the building fall down straight away?

Can you show me a single CD before 9/11 where the demo charges detonate and the building doesn't begin to collapse pretty much straight afterwards?

reply to post by TrickoftheShade


Sure, here are two:

www.youtube.com...

Notice the loud explosions and several flashes about 10 seconds of the video. THe building stands until the
next set of charges are set off.


www.youtube.com...

Same deal here.

What do you believe the simultaneous puffs of smoke would be otherwise Trick?

reply to post by turbofan


In both those videos the puffs of smoke precede the beginning of the collapse by a few seconds. They don't really seem to back your case at all.

This thread is rather pointless imo and is of no worth.

reply to post by TrickoftheShade


How is that? The charges go off, but the building doesn't move until secondary sets of explosives are activated.

It totally supports my case.

You forgot to answer my question:

What do you believe those puffs of smoke might be otherwise?

reply to post by turbofan


In your OP you show what you contend are a series of puffs of smoke from demolition charges.

I asked you to show me a video where, in a CD, similar puffs are not immediately followed by the building's collapse.

You post two videos where there are some flashes and bangs, then a brief pause, then puffs of smoke, and then, like clockwork, immediate collapse.

Do you see? You've posted two videos where the puffs and the collapse occur in quick succession. Which supports my contention, not yours. Even if you are talking about the flashes - which don't exist in your OP - then the pause is still a matter of seconds. But you're not.

reply to post by TrickoftheShade


Sorry, as to your question about what the ejections might be, I don't know. I think it highly unlikely that they're puffs from explosive charges because the building doesn't fall down straight after.

If someone could show me puffs of smoke in a conventional CD that weren't immediately followed by collapse, then I might consider the idea that they're charges. But the video is not that great - they could be something falling, as other posters have said.

Third time:

What do you think those puffs of smoke might be?

reply to post by turbofan


I think I've answered.

It's a common truther demand that precedents are found for things. Steel framed high rises collapsing from fire, planes doing certain things, and so on.

So where's your precedent? Show me puffs of smoke from demo charges that don't initiate some form of collapse almost immediately.

Originally posted by angrydog
for me it looks more like something smokey falling down..left a smoketrail behind and the wind pulls the smoke in that direction.. .you can see it in the video

There is your answer right there Tino. Once again... nothing to see here.

reply to post by Six Sigma


Incorrect. It's not debris falling. I've already proved that with still frame.

Here is a slow motion video of the same puffs of smoke

www.youtube.com...

reply to post by TrickoftheShade


I don't believe you answered. YOu told me what you tihnk it's not...however you have not told me what
you tihnk the smoke might be. What is your best shot?

Further you previous logic about the flashes/smoke and timing is quite funny in my opinion.

Here's a good quesiton (more to follow):

Do you tihnk the smoke from the CD videos is a result of the earlier demo flashes?