Woman's head stepped on by Rand Paul supporters

Originally posted by hotbakedtater
Great another KY incident.

Some thoughts and confessions.

Confession, unfortunately YES jerks like the stomper exist in record droves in my state. Anyone who lives here and is moderately sane cannot deny our state has a lot of buffoons in it, both running it from a local to state level, and just in general. Sorry America. We are not all like this, trust me, but somehow THESE idiots end up being who you see, and yes it is not a fluke, this behavior is common out of this type of folk.

THAT SAID.

These same kind of folk saw an obvious bad ugly blonde ill fitting wig on someone with a PACKAGE in their his /her hand, going towards Pand Paul, their GOD of the moment. For all they knew this CLOWN had a weapon, I mean come on, what would you have done? Also, when the stomper stomped, his bud clearly called him off, and he immediately backed down, while if you notice, the "victim" goes limp, a classic defense of those political savvy protesters or extremist groups....like MoveOn.....

Ashamed this happened in my state, not convinced it was not all staged, set up, plausible it happened like I imagine, a bunch of these type of folk saw a threat to GOD and Reacted according to their standards.

Yes ma'am. I'm from Ashland. We've got them plenty.
The "Good Ole Party" strikes again. Not very christian like, you know?

CONWAY COVER UP
CONWAY COVER UP
CONWAY COVER UP


healthmaybe.com...

www.prisonplanet.com...

www.infowars.com...

BREAKING--Rand Paul didn't personally step on any-ones head!!!!

She is a criminal, with a record to boot. When you make a move towards a candidate, what do you expect?

Originally posted by Infringed
She is a criminal, with a record to boot. When you make a move towards a candidate, what do you expect?

Gotta love the 1 day old members who suddenly pop up to defend this over-the-top violence

Look, you can twist and turn it as you want....trampling on her head was out of line. Defending it just shows what kind of person you are...and right now I have a picture of Darth Vader in front of my eyes.

reply to post by MrXYZ


Actually I've been around for a long time..have had a couple accounts banned....but now I've learned my lesson...for the most part. And if thats the only basis or argument you can come up with, attacking ones membership status, you have alot to learn son!

I suggest you avoid personal attacks kid, (trust me on this one)....and focus on the topic.

Originally posted by Infringed
reply to post by MrXYZ

 

Actually I've been around for a long time..have had a couple accounts banned....but now I've learned my lesson...for the most part. And if thats the only basis or argument you can come up with, attacking ones membership status, you have alot to learn son!

I suggest you avoid personal attacks kid, (trust me on this one)....and focus on the topic.

edit on 28-10-2010 by Infringed because: (no reason given)

Whats the chances the guy who stepped on that woman sounds just like this guy?

I thought you oldboys were meant to have honour and stuff like those cowboy films. It would have been pretty rubbish if John Wayne stepped on some random broad wouldant it? Get your sh*t together guys seriously.

Originally posted by Infringed
reply to post by MrXYZ

 

Actually I've been around for a long time..have had a couple accounts banned....but now I've learned my lesson...for the most part. And if thats the only basis or argument you can come up with, attacking ones membership status, you have alot to learn son!

I suggest you avoid personal attacks kid, (trust me on this one)....and focus on the topic.

edit on 28-10-2010 by Infringed because: (no reason given)

Trust you why? You gonna get yourself banned again? Or try and come and beat me up? (Stomp on my head maybe?)

The main argument should be the video, you don't really need to see more. Objectively speaking, you see a woman, pinned down by several guys to the point where she can't move anymore or hurt anyone. Along cames a duche and kicking the upper part of her shoulders/neck and stepping on her head.

If you don't see a problem with that, your political affiliation has brainwashed you to the point where you can't differentiate between good and evil anymore. In that case I pity you because you turned into yet another politics zombie who is so brainwashed that he can't look at facts anymore.

PS: I'm a bit to old to be called "kid" btw...that is unless you're like 70+, in which case I forgive you old man

reply to post by MrXYZ


Let me ask you? Did you see the video in its entirety? No, we all have seen clips of the situation. Which would further suggest that not all the facts are in. I'm not saying they should have "stomped " her much less pinned her down, but it has been reported, ( I'll see if I can find it) that she made what witnesses suggested as hostile demeanor/actions towards the candidate as he was leaving. Not to mention that is is also speculated that she was a " protester for higher" to engage in hostile acts, as to get something on camera. You claim brainwashing?, but is it possible that this was intended to put the republican candidate in a bad light? I would have to think so...

reply to post by Infringed


Doesn't matter what she did, once she was pinned down, she wasn't a threat anymore. The head stomping was a pure act of senseless violence. For the record, she handed out pins and stickers apparently...sounds like a real dangerous person to me.

As for making Rand look bad...well, if he'd support the duche who stepped on her head, sure...he'll look like an idiot. But that's not a "conspiracy" of the dems or media to make him look bad, that would be he himself doing it by defending what clearly is an idiot.

reply to post by Stewie


It is a colorful figure of speech, nothing more. I dont really think these people literally think Pand Paul is God.

I despise all politicians, Pand simply because he panders and he is not even from Kentucky, yet here his little rally goes and gets National play due to his dumb followers.

Originally posted by Blackmarketeer

Incredible, the lengths to which detractors will go to try and discredit the opposition.

Here is a man, Rand Paul, a "Board Certified" MD who has been in practice for 17 years and what is the one criticism: his label of "Board Certified", which is 100% voluntary and which 60% of American Doctors choose not to acquire.

Whats more perplexing is the fact that Rand Paul was Board Certified by the same organization which he is being criticized for not belonging to...

What is the difference between Dr. Paul and another Doctor who has acquired his or her Board Certification but is never required to re-certify? Nothing. Well, one has to pay $1500 and re-test every 10 years, while the other Doctor does not, yet still received the ABMS stamp of approval...

And from this begins the campaign of deliberate disinformation.

Originally posted by Blackmarketeer
He faked his medical certification, bypassing his states medical board certification to practice optometry, making him a bonafide quake doctor.

From my previous post:

Originally posted by Gladtobehere
First off, the state does not board certify any Doctor so to say that he “bypassed his states medical board certification to practice optometry” is simply wrong. Second of all, he is not an Optometrist (someone qualified to administer eye exams aka Optometry), he is an Ophthalmologist, a Medical Doctor who can prescribe prescription medication and perform surgeries. Finally, there is absolutely no requirement of any kind for a Doctor to be “Board Certified”.

Now that we are done dealing with the facts, everything else that you have quoted is someone's opinion... Not to mention that these are biased opinions from sources such as "crooks and liars", the message boards from "crooks and liars", a Daily Beast "blog" with the heading "The Biggest Rand Paul Outrage Yet", another post from the "crooks and liars" message boards and yet another post from the "crooks and liars" message boards...

Does the source of the opinion invalidate an opinion? No; but I dont know that theres any value in debating someone's opinion while I think it was important to correct your inaccuracies.

However, I do want to address your statement because I am concerned with the accuracy of your comments:

Originally posted by Blackmarketeer
All of these comments raise valid points.

Really?

Originally posted by Blackmarketeer
You can argue all day about Paul technically being licensed

Please explain how Rand Paul is "technically" licensed?

Originally posted by Blackmarketeer
...[he] bypassed his hospital's board certification requirement.

Please provide a source showing that Rand Paul's hospital has a "board certification requirement" and that he "bypassed his hospital's board certification requirement"

Originally posted by Blackmarketeer
It is the libertarian view that rules are meant to be bypassed? To be ignored when they inconvenience you?

I cant speak for Libertarians, but I personally do not believe in a centralized system. Meaning one fast food restaurant, one bank, one car manufacturer or a single authority of any kind.

For example, although there is a "National Institute of Standards and Technology", not everyone agrees with their conclusions.

Originally posted by Blackmarketeer
Can you imagine the horrendous outcome if every doctor were to do this?

Do what exactly, not obtain their "Board Certification"? Being "Board Certified" is 100% voluntary. It has absolutely nothing to do with whether someone can become a Doctor or practice medicine. Furthermore, 60% of Doctors are not board Certified, so to answer your question, no.

I dont see any "horrendous outcomes" from anything related to this in any way shape or form.

Its a baseless attack revolving around a technicality.

I would argue that the establishment is becoming desperate, latching on to whatever they can, not the least of which is this incident with Lauren Valle.

Valle said she wasn't wearing the wig to disguise herself, but that she simply enjoys wearing fake hair as artistic expression.

Valle was hired by the liberal group for three weeks to work on their Republicorp program in Kentucky.

www.nydailynews.com... =news/politics

check out my thread that covers more important aspects of rand/ron pauls campaign instead of trying to smear the only hope left we have in this country, you guys should be ashamed of yourselves for driving this country into the ground...

www.abovetopsecret.com...

reply to post by Cobra.EXE


This country has been divided for a long time now. If you believe Ron Paul is the savior of this county then I feel really sorry for you.

reply to post by adifferentbreed


If you stay around here for a while, you get to know "whatuknow" and understand these things. He's better than he used to be. He used to be an intolerable little troll. Now he's a lovable little gnome LOL!

Hear is that political hack woman trying to attack Rand Paul. Tried to shove the sign into Rands face through the window three time.

www.prisonplanet.com...

reply to post by AwakeinNM

There you have it, folks. A good example of how a libbie will lie to your face even when there is video to prove the lie. Spin at its finest.

Exactly WHY I included a FOX News article in the OP, just for responses like yours.

That dude pushed her shoulder down, he did NOT step on her HEAD. But yeah, I guess "Woman's shoulder pushed with Rand Paul supporter's foot" doesn't sound as diabolical.

The point is, he stepped on a restrained woman on the ground. What part of that is OK to you?

That's not to say the guy was right in putting his foot on that cow, but I am pointing out the utter BS coming from this OP. The repetition of the lie coming from the AP, the lefty state-run media organization. Before you know it, you'll be saying he crushed her skull and she later died.

Somehow, I have the feeling you would be here defending this guy if she had died. BTW, I just loved your pseudo pun with Cow and Utter in this paragraph. Again, just because I knew people would attack the source in defense of this action, I included a FOX News article in the OP, to be "Fair and Balanced"

A Rand Paul supporter stomped on the head of a woman after she was wrestled to the ground by two men Monday night outside the studios of Kentucky Educational Television.

www.fox41.com...

I guess freedom of speech only applies to you liberals and your socialist message and when you do things like this it's perfectly fine?

You won't have to worry, if these TPM Republicans get into power, we won't have to worry bout that horrid 1st Amendment, that you appear to hate so much. Get enough of people like the TPM into office and I am sure that they will repeal the 1st, 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th, 9th, 13th, and 14th Amendments in no time at all.

reply to post by Romantic_Rebel




feel sorry for me?? youre kidding right???

who do YOU put your faith in to lead the country if you dont mind answering??

reply to post by Cobra.EXE


I put my faith is us! We need to get together and lead this country!
I don't see a President as needing to lead us. We have the ability to run the country and make it prosper.

Originally posted by Infringed
She is a criminal, with a record to boot. When you make a move towards a candidate, what do you expect?

Is Tim Profitt a psychic security guard?

He saw a 110 woman with a sign WALK over to the SUV and immediately knew she was an imminent threat, alongside two other bozos.

I don't think he knew a thing about her other than she was from Moveon.org and planning a stunt.

That doesn't give anyone the right to manhandle and stomp you.

It's why he's headed to court.

FYI: It's not illegal to "move toward" a politician.
What country do you think we live in?

- Lee

reply to post by Doctor Smith
Yes, this part of the incident needs to be put into the OP's clip, and made into one clip, so we can see the whole shebang at once.

Seeing her shoving that giant board into Mr Paul's window made me cringe. What a lunatic! Who does that type of thing in today's trigger happy world? And, hello, Kentucky anyone? We some of the trigger happiest folk on this planet!!

I don't need to see more to know she was a plant and an instigator, what we call a TROLL in net lingo.

I am absolutely not excusing stomper man, he can go to jail for assault where he belongs.

From her actions of what looked to me attempted assault on Paul, these supporters IMO had the absolute right to restrain her until the police could sort things out. But stomper man took it way over the edge, after he was told to back off he did, but he still had to point and yell at her, which made him look even more stupid.

He should be in jail right now!

And, so should this woman, for attempted assault on Paul.

I do believe I said it in a very early Rand Paul thread, months ago, Kentucky politics are dirty, some of the dirtiest. I know what I am talking about when it comes to this!