It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
go to any random film school, and theyll teach you about 2nd, 3rd, 4th generation recording. im skeptical too, even though i believe in ETs and had my own sighting. i just think we're all skeptical about different things but we share the same urning for truth.
the question might be: "why dont you (or didnt you) share your ET experience with ATS?
the reason is because i am the only one besides my friend (who passed away in a car wreck) are the only ones who shared that experience. i dont expect you guys to believe me or even understand what i would tell you off of just a written account.
being an ATS member, i know that proof counts and reading a story from a random nobody doesnt mean sh*t unless you have an extremely intriguing credible video to back it up with. which i dont.
but if you know about film and second or third generation shooting, you might know that this video has a reason for not showing a second wing other than the fact that its because of something like project bluebeam.
Google Video Link
Originally posted by Anttyk47
GUYS I'M WRITING IN CAPS BECAUSE THIS IS IMPORTANT FOR DEBUNKING
This video clearly shows a different angle and different video all together.
Look between 0:02 and 0:03
Originally posted by Human_Alien
reply to post by Anttyk47
I believe that's called panning out in the film world. I don't see two different angles at all.
Originally posted by eNumbra
Between those two images, the lighting on the side of the plane seems to have changed, so if the plane tilted a bit it's not out of the realm of possibility that the camera couldn't pick up a very slight difference in color between the reflection on that wing and the sky behind it.
Originally posted by Korg Trinity
I think saying that you can't see the wing because of a change in lighting is not the answer because if that was the case then other parts of the plane would look as though they disappeared too....
First of all, it would NEVER be misidentified visually for a Boeing 767! ...............People KNOW what they filmed, the video has been altered with "fake" images!
Originally posted by Devino
Same phenomena happening at near the same point in time. This certainly does appear to be from the plane rolling to one side and causing the Sun to reflect light off the wing and tail section. The camera cannot distinguish between this reflected light and the background sky so the result is "disappearing wings".
BTW Korg Trinity I accidentally click you as a rival, I went to my profile and unclicked it. If you get an auto message that I named you as a rival you'll know why, was an accident.
Fourth....the TRANSPONDER on United 175 was operating, and was also in 'Mode C', so it was displaying altitude information. ATC watched it....because they could, with the transponder info it was squawking. All the hijacker did was change the code, but he left the transponder ON.
the FIRST reports being broadcasted to the Sheeple of the world said: They thought the second plane was a small commuter plane or even a missile. The news reporters were saying this based on what THEIR witnesses were saying.
Originally posted by cluckerspud
You simply just don't understand that this is not the original format.
You do not understand compressed video. At least admit that.
By your own logic:
I see inter-dimensional force field worms?!
Are they really there?! Or is it a result of compression and poor quality?!