It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ICanThink
reply to post by lunarasparagus
Whatever. If you do not like the word "transparent", use "blending with the sky", it changes nada.
How many times I have to repeat that there is no proof of CGI plane in that video?
I know the mainstream opinion, I am mainstream-proof.
Originally posted by ICanThink
reply to post by lunarasparagus
Whatever. If you do not like the word "transparent", use "blending with the sky", it changes nada.
How many times I have to repeat that there is no proof of CGI plane in that video?
I know the mainstream opinion, I am mainstream-proof.
Originally posted by lunarasparagus
Originally posted by ICanThink
reply to post by lunarasparagus
Whatever. If you do not like the word "transparent", use "blending with the sky", it changes nada.
How many times I have to repeat that there is no proof of CGI plane in that video?
I know the mainstream opinion, I am mainstream-proof.
You still haven't answered the question. What evidence is there that the change in color of the plane's wing is due to intentional manipulation? There is none. However, there is plenty of evidence that the wing's change in color is due to the sunlight, e.g., all the others videos and photographs that show the plane's wing just prior to the impact.
Originally posted by Amanda5
Could be photoshopped due to being so clear and precise and at such an extreme close up.
If you look at MORE footage of the "second strike" you'll see a lot more of this wing anomaly.
Originally posted by Skittle
reply to post by Korg Trinity
You've got great eyes. The world is no longer blind.
NO seriously, great job.
Originally posted by Amanda5
reply to post by snowcrash911
I've seen footage from two different angles and combined with the squibs - I still believe that the entire situation was planned well in advance. Architects and Engineers are coming forward with excellent documentary style explanations for the building collapses.
Originally posted by Amanda5
As for the planes - the plane that was supposed to have hit the pentagon - the surveillance tapes from the nearby garage - if the government did not want to arouse suspicion - why not leave the tapes where they were - witnesses say the FBI were in a bigger hurry to get the tapes than they were to assist or collect evidence at the scene.
Originally posted by Amanda5
The planes flying into the buildings are suspicious to say the least.
Originally posted by Amanda5
There have been witnesses who have stated some very damning descriptions of what they saw on the day.
Originally posted by Amanda5
I have my mind made up - the entire scenario was staged.
Originally posted by Amanda5
I have several documentaries and the evidence is all there.
Originally posted by Amanda5
The plane in this footage is definitely suspicious.
Originally posted by Amanda5
In many threads on this site I see posters write - photoshopped
Originally posted by Amanda5
- why not this one - photoshop the wing back in...
Originally posted by Amanda5
So many liars and so many lies and as JFK stated just before he was murdered - secrets....
There are too many secrets and too much goes on behind closed doors - when governments can sit in public and discuss all business out in the open - then I will begin to believe what I see. Do not tell me the American government did not see the planes coming - were not alerted and their super dooper gee whizz state of the art airforce did not scramble to assist in time. Spare me the details - I am wide wide awake.
Originally posted by PaxVeritas
If you look at MORE footage of the "second strike" you'll see a lot more of this wing anomaly. It happens from different angels and different cameras.
I tried to tell people this for a couple years back in 2004-2006 but it fell on deaf ears. The same anomaly happens around the same moment before impact on other vids. Go look at any website which cahes videos of the second strike. Notice the wing before impact. There's about 5 that show the same thing.edit on 10-2-2012 by PaxVeritas because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Amanda5
reply to post by snowcrash911
As for the planes - the plane that was supposed to have hit the pentagon - the surveillance tapes from the nearby garage - if the government did not want to arouse suspicion - why not leave the tapes where they were - witnesses say the FBI were in a bigger hurry to get the tapes than they were to assist or collect evidence at the scene.
.
Originally posted by Alfie1
You don't seem to appreciate that collecting cctv tapes from nearby premises IS collecting evidence at the scene and it would have been mighty odd if the FBI hadn't bothered.
So far as the Citgo gas station tapes go they were released years ago and you can watch them all you want on youtube :-
www.youtube.com...