OMG! HUGE Cache of New 911 footage released !!!, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 164 times


reply posted on 25-10-2010 @ 10:03 AM by nepafogo
reply to post by Rahjian



I also know someone that was lost that day on one of the planes, but that fact does not prove nor disprove that a plane or no plane hit the towers. The planes we believe that hit the towers could have been taken absolutely anywhere. You seem very emotional when people try and debunk the plane theory and this will get you nowhere in this discussion. What harm is there for people to try and get to the bottom of this sham? Personally, I am all for people investigating this new footage as should you. Too many things about that horrible day do not add up IMO.
edit on 25-10-2010 by nepafogo because: grammar, puntuation



reply posted on 25-10-2010 @ 10:11 AM by Conscope
reply to post by Conluceo

The International Center for 9/11 Studies has secured the release of tens of thousands of photographs, and hundreds of hours of video footage, from the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) under the Freedom of Information Act. You can download the entire NIST Cumulus Video Database (86GB) here:
911datasets.org...



reply posted on 25-10-2010 @ 10:14 AM by Rahjian
reply to post by nepafogo



I agree it should be investigated. I believe it was all a sham as well. However, the theory that it wasn't a plane is a little too much. I know the government / shadow government can pull off some crazy stunts like the Golf of Tonkin for example, but a holograph plane? Really? You guys give them too much credit. I'm sure they get off to driving conspiracy theorists crazy. Literally .


reply posted on 25-10-2010 @ 10:27 AM by Radiobuzz
reply to post by Rahjian



I agree, the holograph theory is bull, there are more simple ways than to use that sort of technology (which as far as we know is not even that advance as to pull this off). However it is indeed interesting that there are four different videos from four different cameras which show a wing of the plane just disappearing. Not breaking and falling, just disappearing into thin air.


reply posted on 25-10-2010 @ 10:37 AM by weedwhacker
reply to post by Radiobuzz



Oh, brother! People keep saying things like this:

....cameras which show a wing of the plane just disappearing.


Baloney! One word: PIXELS

You're seeing a combination of inadequate image resolution, because of the cameras' limitations....and the "blending" into the background whent he wing is superimposed over the building itself, just prior to impact.

Gawd, take a look at the numerous OTHER images (and still photos) and stop with the "wing disappearing" nonsense.


reply posted on 25-10-2010 @ 10:42 AM by catfishman
Originally posted by Radiobuzz
reply to
post by Rahjian



I agree, the holograph theory is bull, there are more simple ways than to use that sort of technology (which as far as we know is not even that advance as to pull this off). However it is indeed interesting that there are four different videos from four different cameras which show a wing of the plane just disappearing. Not breaking and falling, just disappearing into thin air.


I am just waiting for a split-screen, synchronized slow-mo freeze-frame video so I can sit back and watch the debunkers heads explode on this one. They are creative at times, but I hope they have a better explanation than "there was swamp gas reflecting the sky in the way, ldo"


reply posted on 25-10-2010 @ 10:42 AM by Radiobuzz
reply to post by weedwhacker



No, sorry, if this had happen in just one of the videos I too would think it's the camera's fault, however it happened with four different cameras all with different filters. Please watch the videos posted by WanderingThe3rd on the first page in full screen, frame by frame and then show me another video which shows the same thing. I'm not ignorant on video glitches (not an expert either) so I have considered that point of view, however I'm not entirely convinced.


reply posted on 25-10-2010 @ 10:44 AM by dreamsnatcher
reply to post by ugie1028



In the first video does anyone have an explanation about all the flashes that are coming from the building starting at about 1:50 (when they pan out, far left)into the video? It continues until the the end of the video but not in a flashing strobe type of order, and I don't think you would see camera flashes from that distance. Whatever is creating the flashes is pretty high powered.

And the plane in the first video is not an F-18 it is an F-15.



reply posted on 25-10-2010 @ 10:47 AM by catfishman
Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to
post by Radiobuzz



Oh, brother! People keep saying things like this:

....cameras which show a wing of the plane just disappearing.


Baloney! One word: PIXELS

You're seeing a combination of inadequate image resolution, because of the cameras' limitations....and the "blending" into the background whent he wing is superimposed over the building itself, just prior to impact.

Gawd, take a look at the numerous OTHER images (and still photos) and stop with the "wing disappearing" nonsense.


How does your explanation work on a contrast-high, baby-blue sky in the background though?


reply posted on 25-10-2010 @ 10:53 AM by Radiobuzz
reply to post by GoodOlDave



Problem being that, as I have stated on that very same quote, there are four videos, not just one. Unfortunately I don't have much time, I gotta go to work, however I'll watch them again tonight because (and don't quote me on this until I analyze them) I'm fairly sure that the wing is disappearing just at the same time in all four videos (I mean at the same amount of seconds before collapsing in the tower).


reply posted on 25-10-2010 @ 10:54 AM by slimmerpickens
Originally posted by LV426
Hi, was trolling thru the videos there and noticed this, Looks to me like the plane was guided in by laser? Paint the target so to speak!
www.youtube.com... what do you people think?


excellent find! and if you look at about 3 seconds in you can see the laser illuminate the smoke for a split second. its coming from up and left of the building. smoking gun anyone?


reply posted on 25-10-2010 @ 10:56 AM by Korg Trinity
Originally posted by Conluceo
reply to
post by WanderingThe3rd




Here I've embedded them in for you.





OMG!!!

This Video is very very weird!!!

If you look at the 2nd plane as it comes in the Wing disappears just before it strikes..... As if it was vid edited incorrectly.

The wing just dissolves just before the strike.... at about second 5-6.

What do you guys make of that??? I am wondering if this footage is all the rejected footage that didn't make the grade for the official story??

This vid has me going nuts...

Korg.


edit on 25-10-2010 by Korg Trinity because: Spelling



reply posted on 25-10-2010 @ 10:56 AM by plube
well you debunkers are going to be kept busy aren't you as i have found several discrepencies in the vids already to what the OS has said but i will post as i collate them...also just to point out in the op first vid....the second strike...notice how there is not one but two aircraft in the air...before the second strike..which just in that alone you never saw in original footage...there is one that passes the building before the second strike then one coming along the cloud of smoke from the first strike....also contradictory to there not being fighters in the area several of the vids show fighters in the area....
so debunkers get ready to try to defend the OS once again...cause there is so much footage here and testimony it is just the beginning.
the OS has always been full of BS and we so called truthers know and knew one day it will all come out...and this will just be the beginning of it.
so you will have two choices...and yes some will get blown out of proportion...but lots of it will show that the OS is even more full of holes....
thanks for the posting OP now the examination starts...also people please get copies of all the vids you can as ...you know they will start to disappear.
no matter what it just shows that the Orgiginal footage of 9yrs ago WAS held back...it WAS edited...as that first vide alone shows the same footage from fox news on the day...and the was no other planes in the sky in that footage.

I will do a side by side...cheers
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^



Flight 93 was headed for Building 7
  Posted 12 days ago with 48 member flags
9/11 INTERCEPTED
  Posted 4 days ago with 45 member flags
9/11: The WTC Elevator Key
  Posted 14 days ago with 43 member flags
What are your favorite 9/11 debunking tactics?
  Posted 8 days ago with 17 member flags
Who is the Joker on ATS radio now running their mouth?
  Posted 16 days ago with 13 member flags
Was the government a co-conspirator?
  Posted 18 days ago with 9 member flags
British Police Want Us To Present False Flag Terror Evidence.
  Posted 8 days ago with 8 member flags